Suchergebnisse
Filter
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
World Affairs Online
The Sources of Democratic Responsiveness in Mexico
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 10, S. 1435-1439
ISSN: 0010-4140
Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 98-112
ISSN: 0092-5853
Book Review: Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 38, Heft 9, S. 1159-1161
ISSN: 0010-4140
Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 38, Heft 9, S. 1159-1162
ISSN: 0010-4140
Judicial policy implementation in Mexico City and Mérida
In: Comparative politics, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 41-60
ISSN: 0010-4159
World Affairs Online
Managing expectations
In: Journal of theoretical politics, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 274-303
ISSN: 0951-6298
Substitutable Protections: Credible Commitment Devices and Socioeconomic Insulation
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 115-129
ISSN: 1065-9129
An Informational Model of Constitutional Jurisdiction
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 589-607
ISSN: 0022-3816
Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 149-174
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
Can courts be bulwarks of democracy?: judges and the politics of prudence
In: Comparative constitutional law and policy
"Liberal concepts of democracy envision courts as key institutions for the promotion and protection of democratic regimes. Yet social science scholarship suggests that courts are fundamentally constrained in ways that undermine their ability to do so. Recognizing these constraints, this book argues that courts can influence regime instability by affecting inter-elite conflict. They do so in three ways: by helping leaders credibly reveal their rationales for policy choices that may appear to violate legal rules; by encouraging leaders to less frequently make decisions that raise concerns about rule violations; and by encouraging the opposition to accept potential rule violations. In each way, courts promote the prudent use of power. We evaluate implications of this argument using a century of global data tracking judicial politics and democratic survival"--
Legal Institutions and Democratic Survival
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 75, Heft 2, S. 491-505
ISSN: 0022-3816
Dual Nationality Among Latinos: What Are the Implications for Political Connectedness?
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 470-482
ISSN: 0022-3816
The Costa Rican Supreme Court's Compliance Monitoring System
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 774-786
ISSN: 0022-3816
State Delegate Selection Rules for Presidential Nominations, 1972-2000
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 68, Heft 1, S. 180-193
ISSN: 0022-3816