Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?
In: Journal of Law and Society, Band 45, S. S163-S184
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Law and Society, Band 45, S. S163-S184
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No 43 2016
SSRN
Working paper
In: Humanity: an international journal of human rights, humanitarianism, and development, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 273-293
ISSN: 2151-4372
In: Innovation: the European journal of social science research, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 147-167
ISSN: 1469-8412
In: Routledge studies in science, technology and society 34
The first aim of WP8 on cross-evaluation is to identify what policy-makers and civil society representatives active on different levels (Europe, national, urban, neighbourhood) and working in often very different contexts can learn from the research results of the DIVERCITIES project on urban diversities. The second aim is to allow policy-makers and civil society representatives to update our discussions on the governance of urban diversity. The third aim is to create a forum for policy-makers and civil society representatives from various countries and cities to exchange and share information on governing urban diversity among each other. It is set up as a dialogue between DIVERCITIES scholars and policy-makers, civil society representatives and experts from all case study countries. The cross-evaluation has discussed the governance and policy implications of the research findings across all case studies of the DIVERCITIES project and the extent to which the DIVERCITIES research findings 'resonate' with the way policy-makers, experts and civil society representatives understand urban diversity and its governance.
BASE