Sex, politics and society: the regulation of sexuality since 1800
In: Themes in British social history
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Themes in British social history
In: Themes in British social history
In: Key Ideas
Cover -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Editor's foreword to the first edition -- Author's preface to the second edition -- Author's preface to the third edition -- Author's preface to fourth edition -- Acknowledgements to the first edition -- Acknowledgements to the second edition -- Acknowledgements to the third edition -- Acknowledgements to the fourth edition -- 1 Introduction: Languages of sex -- The significance of sexuality -- Words and meanings -- Sexualities in history and society -- 2 The invention of sexuality -- A brief history of the history of sexuality -- A subject in constant flux -- The 'social construction' of sexuality -- The organization of sexuality -- Why sexuality is important -- Intersections -- 3 The meanings of sexual difference -- A true sex? -- The biological imperative -- Evolutionary diversions -- Biological modes of argument -- Sexuality and social relations -- Multiple realities and diverse social worlds -- Performing identities -- Sexuality and the unconscious -- Affect, and the structuring of emotions -- Phobias and norms -- 4 The challenge of diversity -- The language of perversity -- The discourse of diversity -- Deconstructing the categories -- Making choices -- 5 Sexuality, intimacy and politics -- Sexuality on the front line -- Beyond tradition -- Living with uncertainty: HIV/AIDS -- Sexual and intimate citizenship -- Globalization and human sexual rights -- 6 Private pleasures and public policies -- The limits of science -- The ethical dilemma -- Towards sexual democracy -- The human gesture -- Suggestions for further reading -- Bibliography -- Index
In: What is history? series
In: Themes in British social history
In: Contemporary European history, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 277-282
ISSN: 1469-2171
Three obvious, superficially simple but actually intensely complex questions embodied in the title immediately confront the reader of Dagmar Herzog's important new book. First, what do we mean by the 'sexuality' that constitutes the subject matter? Second, what is demarcated by the Europe that provides the geo-political boundaries of this study? Third, does the 'twentieth century' provide a useful temporal unity for the narrative and analysis that is at the heart of the book? Such questions are not mere scholarly nit-picking or academic point scoring, but a tribute to the problematising of the body in space and time that has been a hallmark of the deconstructive and reconstructive energy of recent scholarship on the sexual, and that is now making a welcome entry into mainstream history.
El artículo aborda las discusiones sobre la sanción de la Ley de Unión Civil (Civil Partnership Act) en el Reino Unido durante 2004, que legisla el reconocimiento de las uniones entre personas del mismo sexo. Propone una historización de los argumentos teóricos y políticos de organizaciones LGBT y otros sectores de la sociedad británica desde la década de 1960 respecto de criminalización y reconocimiento. Asímismo, analiza el vínculo entre estas discusiones y los debates parlamentarios para dar cuenta de la modalidad de liberalismo que predominó en la estrategia del gobierno. Finalmente, atiende a los debates en la teoría LGBT y queer sobre la noción de heteronormatividad, matrimonio y sus dimensiones éticas y políticas para los modos de resistencia. ; This article considers the debates opened up by the passing of the Civil Partnership Act in the United Kingdom during 2004, which legally recognised same-sex relationships. It ofers a historization and an analysis of the political and theoretical arguments produced by LGBT organisations as well as other sectors of British society since the 1960s around criminalization and recognition. Furthermore, it analyses the relationship between these discussions and Parliamentary debates within the framework of liberalism, in order to understand the specific strategy used by the Labour government in the 2000s and the type of liberalism that prevailed in their strategy. Finally, it considers the debates on marriage and heteronormativity in their ethical and political dimensions regarding queer resistance.
BASE
In: Genre, sexualité & société, Heft Hors-série n° 1
ISSN: 2104-3736
In: Hirschfeld-Lectures 4
In: Genre, sexualité & société, Heft 14
ISSN: 2104-3736