Sexuelle Gleichberechtigung: Gender, Sexualität und homosexuelle Emanzipation in Europa
In: Hirschfeld-Lectures 4
In: Hirschfeld-Lectures 4
In: Contemporary European history, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 277-282
ISSN: 1469-2171
Three obvious, superficially simple but actually intensely complex questions embodied in the title immediately confront the reader of Dagmar Herzog's important new book. First, what do we mean by the 'sexuality' that constitutes the subject matter? Second, what is demarcated by the Europe that provides the geo-political boundaries of this study? Third, does the 'twentieth century' provide a useful temporal unity for the narrative and analysis that is at the heart of the book? Such questions are not mere scholarly nit-picking or academic point scoring, but a tribute to the problematising of the body in space and time that has been a hallmark of the deconstructive and reconstructive energy of recent scholarship on the sexual, and that is now making a welcome entry into mainstream history.
In: Themes in British social history
El artículo aborda las discusiones sobre la sanción de la Ley de Unión Civil (Civil Partnership Act) en el Reino Unido durante 2004, que legisla el reconocimiento de las uniones entre personas del mismo sexo. Propone una historización de los argumentos teóricos y políticos de organizaciones LGBT y otros sectores de la sociedad británica desde la década de 1960 respecto de criminalización y reconocimiento. Asímismo, analiza el vínculo entre estas discusiones y los debates parlamentarios para dar cuenta de la modalidad de liberalismo que predominó en la estrategia del gobierno. Finalmente, atiende a los debates en la teoría LGBT y queer sobre la noción de heteronormatividad, matrimonio y sus dimensiones éticas y políticas para los modos de resistencia. ; This article considers the debates opened up by the passing of the Civil Partnership Act in the United Kingdom during 2004, which legally recognised same-sex relationships. It ofers a historization and an analysis of the political and theoretical arguments produced by LGBT organisations as well as other sectors of British society since the 1960s around criminalization and recognition. Furthermore, it analyses the relationship between these discussions and Parliamentary debates within the framework of liberalism, in order to understand the specific strategy used by the Labour government in the 2000s and the type of liberalism that prevailed in their strategy. Finally, it considers the debates on marriage and heteronormativity in their ethical and political dimensions regarding queer resistance.
BASE
Abjection abortion agency aids -- Barebacking bisexuality blackmail bodies -- Childhood sexuality choice closet commodification -- Community consent cosmopolitanism cybersex -- Desire disability -- Essentialism -- Families fateful moments femininity feminism -- Fetish friendship fundamentalism -- Gay gay liberation gender globalization -- Great transition -- Habitus heterosexuality homophobia homosexuality -- Human sexual rights hybridity -- Individualization informalization intersectionality intimacy -- Lesbian love -- Marriage masculinity masturbation melancholia -- Mixedness moral panic multiculturalism -- Neoliberalism -- Paedophilia perversion pleasure polyamory -- Pornography prostitution psychoanalysis -- Queer -- Recognition reflexivity regulation relationality -- Religion reproductive technologies risk -- Sado-masochism safer sex same-sex marriage secularization -- Sex addiction sex tourism sexology -- Sexual citizenship sexual cultures sexual diversity sexual ethics -- Sexual identity sexual orientation sexual scripts sexual stories -- Sexual violence sexuality sexualization social capital -- Social constructionism space subject -- Toleration trafficking transgender -- Viagra
In: Política y sociedad: revista de la Universidad Complutense, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Band 46, Heft 1-2, S. 13-25
ISSN: 1130-8001
In: Social policy and society: SPS ; a journal of the Social Policy Association, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 339-348
ISSN: 1475-3073
Three major emphases in interpretations of the state of contemporary intimate relationships can be broadly characterised. These are (i) breakdown and demoralisation; (ii) individualisation and democratisation; and (iii) a recognition of elements of continuity, particularly around power relations. We consider these three positions, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive, relating them to key themes of identities and values, networks and trust and reciprocity, and major theorisations of the concept of social capital. We offer a critique of existing positions and suggestions for the future, cast in the light of potential policy relevance.