Suchergebnisse
Filter
236 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
World Affairs Online
Russland und die Energiekartelle: steht eine Wende in der russischen Energiepolitik bevor?
In: SWP aktuell, 2008,80
World Affairs Online
A focus on EU-Russian relations: towards a close partnership on defined road maps?
In: Schriften zur Internationalen Entwicklungs- und Umweltforschung 15
World Affairs Online
Hegemon statt Partner - Russlands Politik gegenüber dem "nahen Ausland"
In: Osteuropa 7
World Affairs Online
Medizinalcannabis: Fertigarzneimittel laut G-BA erste Wahl
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 34, Heft 5, S. 50-51
ISSN: 2196-6397
Alle Phasen der Schizophrenie mit einem Präparat adressieren
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 33, Heft 10, S. 61-61
ISSN: 2196-6397
MS: Anhaltender Nutzen von Ofatumumab
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 44-45
ISSN: 2196-6397
IL-6-Inhibitor ermöglicht eine anhaltende Schubprophylaxe bei NMOSD
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 33, Heft 1-2, S. 62-62
ISSN: 2196-6397
MS: Früher Start mit Ocrelizumab stabilisiert Behinderungsgrad
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 32, Heft 12, S. 58-58
ISSN: 2196-6397
Seltene kindliche Epilepsien: Cannabidiol reduziert die Anfallshäufigkeit
In: Neurotransmitter, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 64-64
ISSN: 2196-6397
Nord Stream 2 - Deutschlands Dilemma
Das Projekt Nord Stream 2 stellt die Bundesregierung vor das Dilemma, sich zwischen energie- und außenpolitischen Interessen entscheiden zu müssen. Eine Priorisierung sollte nicht ohne den Blick auf den energiepolitischen Kontext erfolgen. In der Frage der Güterabwägung gibt es keine einfachen und 'billigen' Antworten. Das gilt umso mehr, als die Energietransformation in Kooperation die größte Dividende für einen Interessenausgleich zu sein verspricht. Allerdings setzt sie einen Minimalkonsens innerhalb der Europäischen Union (EU), mit den USA, der Ukraine und auch Russland voraus. ; Zweite, am 21.04.2021 korrigierte Version
BASE
Strategic sovereignty in energy affairs: Reflections on Germany and the EU's ability to act
Germany's energy sovereignty is undermined by US sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. As a result, questions surrounding states' strategic capability in energy affairs have recently become a matter of discussion, particularly in Germany, where little attention was previously paid to the notion of energy sovereignty. In view of today's fundamental upheavals in international politics, especially with regard to the geostrategic US-China rivalry, debates about a state's ability to formulate its strategic interests, prioritise its actions and shape its options for energy policy are becoming increasingly important. China's industrial and connectivity policies, the role of the US in energy markets and the energy transformation at large are rapidly changing the global energy landscape and tipping balances of power. The Covid-19 pandemic further accelerates and reinforces these trends. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate energy sovereignty into political debates on the future of sustainable and resilient energy supplies, particularly at the EU level. In order for this to occur, strengthening EU cohesion remains a prerequisite, if not a conditio sine qua non.
BASE
Nord Stream 2 - Germany's dilemma
The Nord Stream 2 project presents the German government with the dilemma of choosing between energy and foreign policy interests. Geopolitical arguments often prevail in the political discourse. Yet, a weighing of priorities requires a look at the energy policy context, too. When it comes to balancing interests, there are no easy or 'cheap' answers. With a focus on the energy context, it has to be emphasized that a cooperative approach toward energy transformation promises the greatest dividend for a balance of interests, but it presupposes a minimum consensus within the European Union (EU), along with the United States (US), Ukraine, and Russia.
BASE
German–Russian gas relations in face of the energy transition
Russia is the world's largest gas exporter and Germany is its most important market. Moreover, natural gas is a centerpiece of the Russian economy and the backbone of its energy supply to the Russian population. In terms of its external gas relations, Germany has always kept a special and strategic position, both in terms of volumes, but also in substance. This contribution explores the impact of the energy transition on the bilateral gas relationship. It argues that the bilateral gas relationship has been subjected to various paradigm shifts in the past, but, until recently, the relationship has been seen as in line with the strategic energy triangle of climate change/sustainability, supply security and economic competitiveness. This perception has come into question over two issues: climate change and supply security. Moreover, Germany's authority over the conduct and the legal framework of bilateral gas relations has been increasingly contested, by Brussels, but also horizontally by other EU member states. At this stage, it is very uncertain whether both sides will manage to maintain and redefine their close energy partnership to address climate change. Decarbonizing the gas value chain would be a centerpiece. This would require a political shift away from securitization to decarbonization, not only in Germany, but even more so in the EU, and in particular, in Russia.
BASE
German–Russian gas relations in face of the energy transition
Russia is the world's largest gas exporter and Germany is its most important market. Moreover, natural gas is a centerpiece of the Russian economy and the backbone of its energy supply to the Russian population. In terms of its external gas relations, Germany has always kept a special and strategic position, both in terms of volumes, but also in substance. This contribution explores the impact of the energy transition on the bilateral gas relationship. It argues that the bilateral gas relationship has been subjected to various paradigm shifts in the past, but, until recently, the relationship has been seen as in line with the strategic energy triangle of climate change/sustainability, supply security and economic competitiveness. This perception has come into question over two issues: climate change and supply security. Moreover, Germany's authority over the conduct and the legal framework of bilateral gas relations has been increasingly contested, by Brussels, but also horizontally by other EU member states. At this stage, it is very uncertain whether both sides will manage to maintain and redefine their close energy partnership to address climate change. Decarbonizing the gas value chain would be a centerpiece. This would require a political shift away from securitization to decarbonization, not only in Germany, but even more so in the EU, and in particular, in Russia.
BASE