Suchergebnisse

Abstract : Domestic violence is a human problem, because in it there is a dimension of human rights violations. Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence are limitative have determined the distribution of the roles of each stakeholder in handling domestic violence cases. Stakeholders involved include the government as a representation of the state, NGOs, families, advocates, law enforcement officers, medical workers and clergy personnel. The number of stakeholders involved in the handling of domestic violence menginditifikasikan that domestic violence is a serious human rights crimes. Porposional division of roles between the state and the non-state institutions in the handling of domestic violence shows these regulations relevant to the concept of civil society in Indonesia.Abstrak : Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah persoalan kemanusiaan, karena di dalamnya berdimensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, telah menentukan distribusi peran masing-masing pemangku kepentingan dalam menangani kasus-kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat termasuk pemerintah sebagai representasi negara, LSM, keluarga, advokat, aparat penegak hukum, tenaga medis dan rohaniawan. Jumlah pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam penanganan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga mengindetifikasikan bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah kejahatan hak asasi manusia. Pembagian porposional peran antara negara dan lembagalembaga non-pemerintah dalam penanganan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga menunjukkan peraturan hukum tersebut relevan dengan konsep masyarakat madani di Indonesia.

Multi etnisitas Indonesia dan potensi konflik di dalamnya / Misbah Zulfa Elizabeth -- Konflik antar agama / Peter Suwarno -- Gerakan fundamentalisme dan konflik agama / Didin Nurul Rosidin -- Peran negara dalam kebebasan beragama dan resolusi atas konflik bernuansa agama / Musahadi H.A.M. -- Mediasi dan konflik agama di Indonesia / Abu Hafsin -- Mediasi dan konflik agama di Indonesia / Daniel Nuhamara -- Mediasi peradilan di Indonesia / Achmad Gunaryo -- Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi / Muhammad Saifullah -- Peace building melalui pendidikan multikultural / Syamsul Ma'arif -- Peace building melalui pengembangan format keberagamaan inklusif dan dialogis / Sholihan.

Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism (KKN) are social diseases that have long infected the nation and state of Indonesia. This paper conveys the social movement theory in the effort to create a government free from KKN through strengthening the role of masyarakat madani (civil society). The Jenkins and Klandermans' diagram of the relationship of social movements with the state and the political system illustrates the problem of a three-way relationship between social movements, political representation and the state. The issue is the extent to which opportunities represented by political representatives in social movements, the impact of social protests on political parties and official political processes, as well as the implications of these relations in modern democracies. In this case, the social movement's chances through the 1998 reforms have been able to undermine the authoritarian New Order regime, a good start for the creation of democracy in Indonesia. However, it turns out that KKN disease that has been rooted to create systemic corruption (institutional entry) creates its own difficulties in eradication. Civil society as an alternative to social forces should be encouraged to play a role in solving the chaotic reform of the Indonesian bureaucracy. The role of civil society through NGOs, intellectuals, students, workers or labours, mass organizations, religious leaders, social media, press and other elements of society are expected to make the government more assertive in enforcing the law and crack down on KKN actors according to MPR XI / 1998, Anti-Corruption Law, as well as other supporting regulations that have been created. Law enforcement agencies, including POLRI, KPK, Judicial Commission are expected to play a role. This is of course with the participation of civil society as a control force that offsets the strength of government in upholding truth and justice. Keywords: civil society, social movements, KKN (Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism), clean government.

This paper discusses the significance of NGOs in the context of improving social welfare in Indonesia. NGOs are civil society elements that grow in the 1970s, after the government fornm- lated the concept of developmentalism as an ideology of development. In this phase up strategic alliances with the state concerning the development of social welfare and success of the project. In the era of the 1990s, the NGO movement emerged with a strategy that is more opposition to the 1998 reform. While the post-reform effort came back redistribute role of NGOs in the social context has changed. Political openness encourages NGOs to build up new alliances with government and political parties, although this time with a field larger movement. The role of NGOs is not only at the level of empowerment and improvement of social welfare, but as elements that contribute to the creation of Good Governance. This paper concludes that the various shades of transformation that happened, NGOs remain an important element of government as partners in the social wel- fare community.Keywords :. Developmentalism, Good Governance, Civil Society and Paradigm.

Nahdlatul Ulama dan negara / Andrée Feillard -- Konjungtur sosial politik di jagat NU paska khittah 1926 / Martin van Bruinessen -- NU, asas tunggal Pancasila dan komitmen kebangsaan / Einar M. Sitompul -- Pemahaman Abdurrahman Wahid tentang Pancasila dan penerapannya dalam era paska asas tunggal / Douglas E. Ramage -- Langkah non politik dari politik NU / Daniel Dhakidae -- Khittah dan penguatan civil society di Indonesia / Muhammad A.S. Hikam -- Jam'iyyah Nahdlatul Ulama / Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh

Ormas, which are familiarly referred to as community organizations, are organizations that exist and are formed from the community voluntarily based on the same needs, interests, common aspirations, activities and goals in participating in development for the sake of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. The purposes of this study are to reveal the scope of government authority in the dissolution of civil society organizations in Indonesia and the mechanism for the dissolution of civil society organizations in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used in the form of secondary and primary legal sources through recording and documentation studies in which legal materials and data are managed using interpretive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the scope of government authority in the dissolution of community organizations is based on the attribution authority. Regarding the mechanism for dissolving community organizations, it refers to the provisions of Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning Ormas. The author suggests that the government always conduct socialization and supervision related to the activities of community organizations so that the community and mass organizations must be guided by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Pancasila because it is the most important principle in establishing community organizations.