Suchergebnisse

Vol. 0 published: Washington, D.C. : Civil War Centennial Commission. ; Vol. 0: preprint with a foreword by Bruce Catton and Allan Nevins. ; A guide-index to the "Official Records, Armies"--Cover, [v. 0] ; Vols. 0, 1, 3-5 without series statement ; A guide-index to the records administered by the National Archives and Records Service ; [v. 0] Prospectus.--v. 1. Conspectus. Section A-K.--v. 2. Main Eastern theater of operations. fasc. 1. Section L: Tables of key reports for principal military operations. fasc. 2-4. Section M: Comprehensive index of recognized military operations. fasc. 5. Section N: Checklist of recognized military operations by State and date. Section O: Checklist of recognized military operations by state, county and date.--v. 3. Lower Seaboard theatre of operations and Gulf approach (1861-1863). Main Western theatre.--v. 4. Main Western theater of operations except Gulf approach (1861-1863).--v. 5. Trans-Mississippi and Pacific coast theatres of operations ; Mode of access: Internet. ; DREF; E470.U63: For main work see: United States. War Dept. Official records of the Union and Confederate Armies, 1861-1865. MICROFILM 4202.E NEWS.

Civil society is analysed from an organizational perspective. Many ideas about the quality of interaction in civil society are similar to ideas about how to create excellent organizations. Although there is no clear definition of civil society, it is first of all understood in contrast to the state. Organizational forms mentioned in connexion with civil society, such as voluntary associations, new social movements and networks, are analysed. None, however, has proved to be without restrictions inherent in all organizations. The quality of civil society cannot exceed the quality of its organizational forms. I conclude that the structures of civil society are not persistent. Civil society exists through the coincidence of several processes in the interaction between people and organizations, and the notion of civil society is not more incompatible with the state than with other organizational arrangements. On the other hand, there are no organizational forms to assure a permanent establishment of civil society.

Based on a two-year project launched by the Journal. Its goal was to engage students, faculty, and all members of the wider Osgoode and professional communities in an ongoing discussion about the nature and limits of law, seen through the lens of civil disobedient conduct in a legal polity that had developed mature democratic and civil liberty enhancing institutions. To this end, a variety of panels, seminars, and lectures were organized, beginning in the Fall of 2001. They were interpellated into the law school's curriculum. A culminating event was a conference in the Fall of 2002, to which a select number of scholars, professionals, and activists were invited. The contributions in this collection were generated from this project's activities.