Legal findings by judges in interpreting the meaning of the text of the Act can function to realize and provide protection for the community of justice seekers, National legislation and its conclusions in the form of court decisions are reported to be open to various studies and deconstructive criticism that carried out through various social movements that care about the law, so that national law can function as one of the forces to mobilize the lives of new Indonesian people who are able to act responsively for the public interest. From this definition the obligation of the Judge to uphold justice comes from its authority, namely the Judicial Discretion policy. In the event that the judge grants Maternity compensation to the Law Breaking Lawsuits, insofar as it has fulfilled the Elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code, which brings the legal consequences the judge can grant Immaterial compensation based on found
The resources of Customary Forest play an important role for Talang Mamak Indigenous People to survive. The exploitation of the forest by private company and investor has caused a violent conflict. The situation of the indigenous people becomes worsen since local government does not fully protect their rights on the forest. Even, Local government tends to defend private company and investor in addressing the conflict. Customary forest of Talang Mamak indigenous people is in the oligarchs grip and conflict of interest with their elder. The Indigenous people are in crossroad, to preserve or to release their heritage and right. This study aims to determine the efforts of Talang Mamak Indigenous People to maintain their existence in the customary forest resources battle with private company and investor. This study used qualitative descriptive method. The data collection were documentation analysis and other relevant literature. This study used Theory of Oligarchy (Winters 2011) as grounded theory. The result found that the efforts of the indigenous people to fight for their rights getting weak. Some of them begin to accept compensation from the company and investor, in other word, some of them are willing to release their heritage and right on the forest. ; The resources of Customary Forest play an important role for Talang Mamak Indigenous People to survive. The exploitation of the forest by private company and investor has caused a violent conflict. The situation of the indigenous people becomes worsen since local government does not fully protect their rights on the forest. Even, Local government tends to defend private company and investor in addressing the conflict. Customary forest of Talang Mamak indigenous people is in the oligarchs grip and conflict of interest with their elder. The Indigenous people are in crossroad, to preserve or to release their heritage and right. This study aims to determine the efforts of Talang Mamak Indigenous People to maintain their existence in the customary forest resources battle with private company and investor. This study used qualitative descriptive method. The data collection were documentation analysis and other relevant literature. This study used Theory of Oligarchy (Winters 2011) as grounded theory. The result found that the efforts of the indigenous people to fight for their rights getting weak. Some of them begin to accept compensation from the company and investor, in other word, some of them are willing to release their heritage and right on the forest.
AbstractThe continue phenomenon of fuel prices increasing in Indonesia arealways both between the two sides (there are government andcommunity). Debating the agree side and disagree side of being the maincontents of the escort policies. But we know the socio-economicscondition of 'tragic' Indonesia be raised expenditures greater thanrevenues, while expenditure was only focused on subsidies ofenergywhich unfortunatelymore widely used by the upper middle classsociety rather than small communities. Besides external factors that affectthe pattern of the domestic politics of oil policy. In the position of theeconomic dilemma, the government apllying the economic logic of "ParetoOptimum ", it's meanthat the transfering of enjoyment to be fair, but it isn'tonly focusing only on short-term policies, but also followed byreconstruction the quality of sustainable development. And Ibn Taimiyyahas one of the Islamic Economic Thinkers, which one of the legacyof thesocio- economicjustice concept to be analysis study and be the counter ofthe phenomenon of rising fuel prices and Compensation Package, as wellas to macroeconomic conditions in Indonesia.Keywords : Oil Politics, the rising prices of fuel and fuel subsidies, fuelcompensation package, The Conception of Socio-Economic Justice fromIbn Taimiyyah.
Penal mediation is an alternative form of settlement of cases outside the court by prioritizing the principle of resortative justice which aims to achieve justice that is oriented towards improving the relationship between perpetrators and victims. This study aims to examine how the implementation and the obstacles faced by the Makassar City Police in conducting penal mediation in the settlement of minor theft cases. This research is a normative empirical research with a qualitative analysis approach. The result of the research obtained is that the implementation of penal mediation by the Makassar City Police in resolving minor theft cases is carried out based on police discretion as regulated by Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia and Circular No. SE / 8 / VII / 2018 dated 27 July 2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases. The circular regulates how to apply the concept of restorative justice in solving criminal cases at the level of investigation or investigation in the police, while in its implementation there are still obstacles faced by the Makassar City Police, including emotional factors, namely the existence of selfishness between the perpetrator or victim justifying oneself and blaming the opposing party and financial (economic) factors, namely the inconsistency between the victim and the perpetrator to make peace, especially in matters of compensation.
AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI ; AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI
