Constraints
In: China news analysis: Zhongguo-xiaoxi-fenxi, Heft 1551, S. 8
ISSN: 0009-4404
5799 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: China news analysis: Zhongguo-xiaoxi-fenxi, Heft 1551, S. 8
ISSN: 0009-4404
In: British journal of political science, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 251-268
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: Journal of democracy, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 132-136
ISSN: 1045-5736
In: Skepsis und Engagement: Festschrift für Hermann Korte, S. 95-112
In: Policy studies journal: an international journal of public policy, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 208-213
ISSN: 0190-292X
A model of affirmative action constraints is defined, according to which economic, political, & administrative/labor pool constraints have impact on a state's ability to attract minority employees in state & local government. Estimation of this model with 1975 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission data indicates that political constraints are least important. The impacts of twelve environmental variables on both this measure (minority penetration) & the Gini index of inequality (minority stratification) at the same bureaucratic level are assessed. Minority penetration is likely to be increased only through long-run economic factors, while minority stratification is likely to be attainable more rapidly & with fewer economic constraints. 2 Tables. W. H. Stoddard.
In: Crossborder monitor: weekly briefing service for international executives, Band 8, Heft 48, S. 10-11
In: Middle East international: MEI, Band 586, S. 11-12
ISSN: 0047-7249
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 492 (July), S. 61
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: The Jerusalem quarterly, S. 122-144
ISSN: 0334-4800
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 19-37
ISSN: 0192-5121
World Affairs Online
In: Labor and Globalization, 27
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 171-192
ISSN: 0304-4130
The rational choice assumption is already disputable at the individual level of decision-making. At the level of collective decision-making unitary rational action is an unrealistic assumption. It neglects the transitivity of collective preferences issue, the logic of collective action and freeriding, the agency problem, and the human tendency to agree with each other irrespective of the facts. While unitary rational action is rejected as a basis for theorizing on international relations and war, the idea of decision-making under constraints seems as valid in the interstate context as in economics. The most important constraints on national security decision-making are the anarchical character of the international system and the corresponding need for self-help, the security and the territorial delimitation dilemmas, the presence or absence of plausible blueprints for victory, and the presence or absence of domestic constraints on bellicosity. A simple explanatory model of war built on these ideas is suggested and tested with dyadic data for the 1962-1980 period. In addition, there is some discussion of why collective security is doomed to fail, and why hegemony rather than balance improve the prospects of peace. (European Journal of Political Research / AuD)
World Affairs Online
In: East European politics and societies and cultures: EEPS, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 28-47
ISSN: 0888-3254