Suchergebnisse

5. Doping ve sportu dětí a mládeže z psycho-sociálního hlediska5.1 Adolescenti jako riziková skupina; 5.2 Doping u českých adolescentů jako výzkumný problém; 5.2.1 Užívání a postoje k dopingu; 5.2.2. Role motivace v prevalenci dopingu; 5.3 Situační aspekty tendence užívat doping; 6. Doping ve sportu adolescentů z kvalitativního hlediska; 6.1 Co je doping z pohledu respondentů a jaké jsou důsledky jeho užívání; 6.2 Rozšíření dopingu ve sportu z pohledu respondentů; 6.3 Záměr a tendence užívat doping; 6.4 Zkušenosti s dopingem; 6.4.1 Možnost dopovat vědomě a cíleně

Systemic corruption is not a failure of individuals, i.e. the result of their deviant behaviour, but a collective phenomenon shared mainly by public institutions as a whole. The phenomenon is based on an effort to establish a new set of corrupt norms inside such institutions affecting policymaking, administrative procedures, public procurements, and the behavior of employees etc. In spite of the fact that impacts of systemic corruption on the areas of government, civil freedoms, social cohesion, and public economy are well known, there is very little practical research involving concrete evidence of systemic corruption in particular cases. This paper attempts to clarify how to generate a set of indicators of systemic corruption and then identify and verify them in a real-life political environment – in our specific case, the administration and policymaking of Liberec City Council between 1998 and 2010. The research was based upon elaborated interviews (with politicians, public servants, prosecuting authorities etc.), document analysis (reports and papers of the city council and municipal government, contracts and invoices etc.), and political and media analysis. The results are significant, as only an understanding of how a corrupt system really works can lead to the implementation of suitable anticorruption measures. ; Systemic corruption is not a failure of individuals, i.e. the result of their deviant behaviour, but a collective phenomenon shared mainly by public institutions as a whole. The phenomenon is based on an effort to establish a new set of corrupt norms inside such institutions affecting policymaking, administrative procedures, public procurements, and the behavior of employees etc. In spite of the fact that impacts of systemic corruption on the areas of government, civil freedoms, social cohesion, and public economy are well known, there is very little practical research involving concrete evidence of systemic corruption in particular cases. This paper attempts to clarify how to generate a set of ...