Violence and Democracy
In: Politologický časopis, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 324-331
ISSN: 1211-3247
In: Politologický časopis, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 324-331
ISSN: 1211-3247
In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 11-34
In this article the authors describe what forms of political participation, outside the electoral process, the populations of twenty-one European countries tend to employ & to what degree. They identify three types of non-electoral political participation: active-conventional, active-demonstrational, & passive participation. Overall non-electoral political participation is considerably lower in the post-communist & Mediterranean countries than in the Western European & Scandinavian countries. In the latter countries the passive type of political participation is clearly a much stronger form of participation than the other two types. Conversely, in the Mediterranean countries passive participation is weaker & is exceeded in places by the active-conventional type of participation. The Mediterranean area is also notable for the unusually strong presence of the active-demonstrational type of participation. The authors also examine the social micro- & macro-conditions related to these three types of political participation. In conclusion they attempt to address the question of whether there is a connection between political activity & satisfaction with the way democracy works.
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 128
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Politologicky Casopis, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 156-158
In: Politologický časopis, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 94-97
ISSN: 1211-3247
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 94-97
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
The article analyses the evolution of the Slovak political party "Smer" (Direction) and its position in the party system of Slovak Republic. The article focuses on the shift of the party program from the "Centrist Populism" towards "Social Democracy." According to the first program documents the Party of "Smer" (Direction) was designed as pragmatic, non-ideological party. In the persistent conflict between authoritarianism vs. democracy "Smer" identified itself as the pro-democratic and pro-market force. Party policy before 2002 contained only few social democratic components; it was closer to the conservative or right-wing populist parties. After the parliamentary election 2002 and the failure of non-communist left "Smer" decided to become a member of the Socialist International (SI) and Party of European Socialists (PES). The process of the institutional approach to the international Social Democratic Party structures was accompanied by the substantial changes in the social and economic program of the party. The process was completed on the institutional level in May 2005, when Smer joined both SI and PES, and on the level of political program on the Party Congress in December 2005. In the process of so called "socialdemocratisation" of "Smer" the international factor played crucial role, especially the need to have an international partner in the European Parliament. "Smer" met the standards of the Social Democratic identity only in the social and economic affairs. The other five dimensions - environmental policy, participative democracy, cultural and human-rights dimension, supra-national dimension and the dimension of equality and freedom "Smer" met only partially or not at all, so these process remains unfinished. According to some political declarations "Smer" remains the populist party and the uncompromising critic of the right-wing government of Mikuláš Dzurinda, on the other side the official documents of the party anticipate only the moderate corrections of the economical and social reforms, ...
BASE
In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 458-462
In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 454-458
Knižní recenze / Book review. ; Knižní recenze / Book review.
BASE
In: Politologický časopis, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 332-343
ISSN: 1211-3247
A review essay on a book edited by Helmut Kramer, Demokratie und Kritik -- 40 Jahre Politikwissenschaft in Osterreich ([Democracy and Critique -- 40 Years of Political Science in Austria] Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang, 2004).
In: Politeia
Zdá se, že v soucasné dobe prožíváme krizi liberální demokracie. Symptomy jsou neprehlédnutelné: pokles volební úcasti, nebývalá schopnost oligarchií využívat fungování státu ve svuj prospech, vlády tvrdošíjne prosazující neoliberální reformy i pres vytrvalý odpor obcanu, odumírání sociálního státu a v neposlední rade úspech nového populismu pravice. V této knize se hledá protilék. Príciny krize autori nespatrují ve výzvách globálního kapitalismu, natož v pohnuté ceské historii. Zajímá je vnitrní napetí v liberální demokracii samotné, které spatrují v nedostatecné artikulaci vztahu mezi libera
In: Politologický časopis, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 324-331
ISSN: 1211-3247
A review essay on a book by John Keane, Violence and Democracy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge U Press, 2004). References.