The Developmental State is Dead: Long Live the Developmental State!
In: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 1, 2013, Forthcoming
In: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 1, 2013, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Elements in the politics of development
World Affairs Online
In: The Palgrave Handbook of International Development, S. 121-137
In: China and Post-Socialist Development, S. 7-54
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 63, Heft 3, S. 999-1000
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 267-268
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: Routledge studies in development and society 38
1. Rethinking the developmental state in the twenty-first century / Michelle Williams -- 2. The developmental state in retrospect and prospect : lessons from India and South Korea / Vivek Chibber -- 3. Liberal globalization, capabilities and the developmental network state in Ireland / Sean O Riain -- 4. Developmental state in transition : the state and the development of Taiwan's biopharmaceutical industry / Jenn-Hwan Wang -- 5. A Chinese developmental state : miracle or mirage? / Ching Kwan Lee -- 6. South Africa's emergent 'green developmental state'? / Vishwas Satgar -- 7. Development in an antidevelopmental state : the market politics of renewable energy in an advanced country and its implications for the environment / Barbara Harriss-White -- 8. The Brazilian social developmental state : a progressive agenda in a (still) conservative political society / Celia Lessa Kerstenetzky -- 9. Politics of democratic decentralization and the developmental state : a study of the Kerala experience / Thomas Isaac -- 10. The developmental state : divergent responses to modern economic theory and the twenty-first-century economy / Peter Evans.
In: Beyond the Developmental State, S. 85-109
In: Routledge Studies in Development and Society
The End of the Developmental State? brings together leading scholars of development to assess the current status of the ""developmental state"" in several developing and transitional economies of South Korea, Taiwan, Ireland, the United Kingdom, China, South Africa, Brazil and India. Has the concept of the developmental state become outmoded? These authors would suggest not. However, they do argue that the historical trajectories of developmental states in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Europe suggest all too clearly that the concept must be re-examined critically and creatively. The range an
In: Routledge studies in development and society, 38
The End of the Developmental State? brings together leading scholars of development to assess the current status of the ""developmental state"" in several developing and transitional economies of South Korea, Taiwan, Ireland, the United Kingdom, China, South Africa, Brazil and India. Has the concept of the developmental state become outmoded? These authors would suggest not. However, they do argue that the historical trajectories of developmental states in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Europe suggest all too clearly that the concept must be re-examined critically and creatively.
The developmental state has become a popular definition used to discuss the "China Model". Based on the developmental state, various definitions have originated. Concepts such as new developmental states and neo-developmentalism are widely applied to describe Chinese development. This paper summarizes representative opinions in examining China from the perspective of the developmental state, and reevaluates the specificity and characteristics of the Chinese developmental state in terms of structural dynamism. We believe that the developmental state as a concept is not precisely defined. Instead, its application and extension must incorporate considerations of historical specificity and subject continuity. Considering such initial constraints as politics, economics, and military conditions, China differs significantly from other classic examples of East Asian developmental states. Consequently, China would also face different developmental paths, directions, corresponding policies, and measures from those of other developmental states. The East Asian experiences of developmental states only offer limited scope for reference. Still, in terms of effective integration between markets, governments, and societies, their experiences and lessons prove worthy for consideration and reflection.
BASE
Intro -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- About the Book -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- Research Methods and Data -- References -- Chapter 2: Current Debates and Theoretical Arguments -- Section 1: Explaining Growth: Liberalism vs. Institutionalism -- Liberalism and the Korean Political Economy -- Institutionalism and the Korean Political Economy -- Section 2: Explaining Change: Differentiation Within Developmental State Theory -- Dissolution of Developmentalism -- Continuity of Developmentalism -- Section 3: Theoretical Alternative and Analytical Framework -- Classification of the Types of Capitalism -- Liberal Capitalism -- Corporatist Capitalism -- State-Led Capitalism -- Differentiation Within State-Led Capitalism -- Governance Method: Dirigisme vs. Enabling State -- Developmental Strategies -- Politics of Evolution -- References -- Chapter 3: Characteristics of Korean Economic Growth -- Section 1: Economic Growth Based on Manufacturing Exports -- Section 2: From Finished Product Industry to Components and Materials Industry -- Section 3: From Input-Driven Economy to Innovation-Driven Economy -- References -- Chapter 4: The Traditional Korean Political Economic Model -- Section 1: State-Business Relations -- Establishment of State-Led Economic Development Strategy -- Selective Industrial Policy -- Capacity of Developmental States: Policy Instruments -- Domestic Capital Mobilization -- Raising Foreign Capital -- Closed and Centralized Policy Decision-Making -- Exclusiveness and Non-institutionalization of the Decision-Making Process -- Role of the Economic Planning Board -- Governance of Monetary and Financial Policy -- Economic Nationalism -- Section 2: Traditional Interfirm Relations in Korea -- Characteristics of the Korean Components Procurement System.
In: Korean journal of policy studies: KJPS, Band 4, Heft 0, S. 129-146
While state involvement is blamed for stagnation and economic disarray in most regions of the Third World, it has become fashionable in the last ten years to give the East Asian state credit for playing a positive economic role. Amsden (1979) argued that Taiwan was not the model market economy portrayed by its American advisors nor the exemplar of dependence portrayed by its detractors, but a successful case of etatisme. Even observers with a neoclassical bent(e.g. Jones and Sakong, 1980) recognized the central role of the state in Korea's rapid industrialization. Increasingly, these states were labeled "developmental states" and held up as models to be emulated by other aspiring Third World nations.
In: Governance in Pacific Asia : Political Economy and Development from Japan to Burma
In: The journal of modern African studies: a quarterly survey of politics, economics & related topics in contemporary Africa, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 279-297
ISSN: 0022-278X
World Affairs Online