Suchergebnisse

Imprint varies: Newark, N.J. : Eltweed Pomeroy, 1895- ; "A non-partisan advocate of pure democracy." ; Has supplement: Vol. 1, no. 7 (Jan. 1895). ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Official organ of the National Direct Legislation League.

Editor: Eltweed Pomeroy. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued with: The Proportional representation review, new series, vol. 1, no. 0 (Dec. 1901)-v. 2, no. 4 (Dec. 1903)

Reprinted from the Public, January 8, 1908. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Presented by Mr. Owen. Ordered printed June 15, 1910. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Mode of access: Internet. ; Spec. Coll. Haynes copy is part of a collection (Collection 1604). To page this item, use the collection record; to find the collection record, search the title: Collection of books from the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation Library. Item is in box 241. Black cloth over boards, stamped in gilt.

Presented by Mr. Owen. Ordered printed January 13, 1914. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Spec. Coll. Haynes copy is part of a collection (Collection 1604). To page this item, use the collection record; to find the collection record, search the title: Collection of books from the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation Library. Item is in box 242. Printed white wrappers.

Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College.

Consists of the articles and symposiums pub. in the New time, in 1897 and 1898, with introduction by J.W. Sullivan and an article by Robert Tyson. ; Cover-title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Cover title. ; Electronic reproduction. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 44

In double columns. ; Caption title. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Electronic reproduction. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 44

In double columns. ; Caption title. ; Electronic reproduction. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 44

Our Code of criminal procedure regarding special trials is characterized from the binomial of direct trial and abbreviated one. The direct trial provided by articles 400-402 of this code, different from the phases of ordinary trial procedure holds in itself several features which generally can be more evident in judicial process economy, the avoidance of delays of judicial hearings, but even in corruptive phenomena prevention which are not rare during the evolvement of judicial processes. Exactly the direct trial being very different from the ordinary judgment procedure, as the term of preliminary investigations is "substantially" very reduced, can be considered to enter with full rights in the category of alternatives of trials provided by our code of criminal procedure. In interpretation of provisions of this code it is noticed that the direct trial can be applied in two typical cases: firstly basing on article 400 paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure this type of judgment is applied when "the defendant is arrested on view/spot", and secondly basing on paragraph 3 of article 400 of Criminal Procedure Code, when "the defendant during the interrogation, has confessed and his guilt is plain". DOI:10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n6p137

This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).

At head of title: Bulletin number one, Information Department, Socialist Party of America, Carl D. Thompson, director. ; Mode of access: Internet.

An increasing number of private companies are now offering direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services. Although a lot of attention has been devoted to the regulatory framework of DTC genetic testing services in the USA, only limited information about the regulatory framework in Europe is available. We will report on the situation with regard to the national legislation on DTC genetic testing in seven European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Portugal, France, Germany, the United Kingdom). The paper will address whether these countries have legislation that specifically address the issue of DTC genetic testing or have relevant laws that is pertinent to the regulatory control of these services in their countries. The findings show that France, Germany, Portugal and Switzerland have specific legislation that defines that genetic tests can only be carried out by a medical doctor after the provision of sufficient information concerning the nature, meaning and consequences of the genetic test and after the consent of the person concerned. In the Netherlands, some DTC genetic tests could fall under legislation that provides the Minister the right to refuse to provide a license to operate if a test is scientifically unsound, not in accordance with the professional medical practice standards or if the expected benefit is not in balance with the (potential) health risks. Belgium and the United Kingdom allow the provision of DTC genetic tests.