1503 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Long, Ryan (2016). Egalitarianism. In James Fieser & Bradley Dowden (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
SSRN
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 99
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: Ethics & international affairs, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 269-276
ISSN: 1747-7093
In: Philosophy & public affairs, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 5-39
ISSN: 0048-3915
In: Theoria: a journal of social and political theory, Band 61, Heft 140
ISSN: 1558-5816
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 136-150
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: Journal of comparative family studies, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 315-329
ISSN: 1929-9850
In: Analyse & Kritik: journal of philosophy and social theory, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 89-94
ISSN: 2365-9858
Abstract
In this short commentary on Ken Binmore's Natural Justice I primarily examine the relationship between mainstream egalitarian theories and Binmore's approach. I argue that Binmore uses key concepts in non-standard ways. As a result, he doesn't engage enough with the views he criticises.
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 34, Heft 4, S. 485-516
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Political studies, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 663
ISSN: 0032-3217
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, Band 39, Heft 4, S. 470
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: Political studies, Band 36, Heft Dec 88
ISSN: 0032-3217
Considers the alleged incompatibility between individual autonomy and the achievement and subsequent maintenance of an egalitarian society. Argues that it is only where an egalitarian society is in place that a like autonomy can be exercised by each citizen. Discusses the 3 main grounds that have been advanced to show there is such an incompatibility. (Abstract amended)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Behavioural public policy: BPP, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 403-408
ISSN: 2398-0648
AbstractIn this paper, I reflect on the implications that ultimatum and dictator game experiments might have for public policy and for the debates over egalitarianism. Experiments suggest that people are more inclined to redistribute when outcomes are influenced by luck than effort. This can create difficulties for public policy when people hold contrasting views over whether luck or effort determine outcomes. The results also appear to play into forms of luck egalitarianism. However, they may also be consistent with an alternative understanding of egalitarianism as the impulse to have rules that treat people equally.
In: Metroeconomica, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 24-44
SSRN