Suchergebnisse

Discusses contemporary approaches to social equality between men & women, or "gender equality" to argue that equal treatment is a constitutive feature of justice. Gender stereotypes of British domestic policy deny men the possible opportunity to become active parents, & thus designate the role of primary care to women. The grand principles of justice & equality are also weakened in a sexual stereotype based concept of gender. Analysis of British legislation on the "principle of equal treatment" & the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act are bogged down in counter-productive clauses. The common division of labor between normative social & political theory & policy design is concluded to not serve the contemporary objectives of equality & justice. Critical interrogation of assumptions about the principle of equal treatment & stereotypes must reconsider sex discrimination measures, & reinterpret what is relevant for both men and women. References. J. Harwell

Abstract Motivated by GATT, we endogenize the formation of a club whose members have to abide by the MFN principle of non‐discrimination. The underlying model is that of oligopolistic intraindustry trade. While an MFN club does not alter average tariff levels across countries, it increases aggregate world welfare; makes non‐members worse off; and can immiserize its high cost members. These results imply that (i) core WTO rules such as MFN are valuable even if multilateral negotiations deliver limited trade liberalization and (ii) the distributional effects of MFN maybe one reason why developing countries have been granted Special and Differential treatment at the WTO.