Suchergebnisse

At the beginning of the 21st century, rural policy remains one of the most important areas of the public policy in both developing and most advanced countries. Therefore, significant financial and human resources are made available for the implementation of this policy measures. For instance, in 2007 through 2013 the European Union (EU) budget for European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development accounted for EUR 96.2 billion (11 per cent of the total EU budget). A similar situation was observed in Lithuania. The amount of the EU support for rural development in 2007-2013 amounted to LTL 6 billion 096 million with co-financing from the Lithuanian national budget of LTL 1 billion 799 million. A large number of specialists and designated institutions develop and implement rural policy measures and monitor the support programmes. Are the huge financial and human resources assigned for rural development actually used in an efficient way, are rural policy decisions able to adapt to the highly dynamic situation in the business and social life?

At the beginning of the 21st century, rural policy remains one of the most important areas of the public policy in both developing and most advanced countries. Therefore, significant financial and human resources are made available for the implementation of this policy measures. For instance, in 2007 through 2013 the European Union (EU) budget for European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development accounted for EUR 96.2 billion (11 per cent of the total EU budget). A similar situation was observed in Lithuania. The amount of the EU support for rural development in 2007-2013 amounted to LTL 6 billion 096 million with co-financing from the Lithuanian national budget of LTL 1 billion 799 million. A large number of specialists and designated institutions develop and implement rural policy measures and monitor the support programmes. Are the huge financial and human resources assigned for rural development actually used in an efficient way, are rural policy decisions able to adapt to the highly dynamic situation in the business and social life?

At the beginning of the 21st century, rural policy remains one of the most important areas of the public policy in both developing and most advanced countries. Therefore, significant financial and human resources are made available for the implementation of this policy measures. For instance, in 2007 through 2013 the European Union (EU) budget for European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development accounted for EUR 96.2 billion (11 per cent of the total EU budget). A similar situation was observed in Lithuania. The amount of the EU support for rural development in 2007-2013 amounted to LTL 6 billion 096 million with co-financing from the Lithuanian national budget of LTL 1 billion 799 million. A large number of specialists and designated institutions develop and implement rural policy measures and monitor the support programmes. Are the huge financial and human resources assigned for rural development actually used in an efficient way, are rural policy decisions able to adapt to the highly dynamic situation in the business and social life?

At the beginning of the 21st century, rural policy remains one of the most important areas of the public policy in both developing and most advanced countries. Therefore, significant financial and human resources are made available for the implementation of this policy measures. For instance, in 2007 through 2013 the European Union (EU) budget for European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development accounted for EUR 96.2 billion (11 per cent of the total EU budget). A similar situation was observed in Lithuania. The amount of the EU support for rural development in 2007-2013 amounted to LTL 6 billion 096 million with co-financing from the Lithuanian national budget of LTL 1 billion 799 million. A large number of specialists and designated institutions develop and implement rural policy measures and monitor the support programmes. Are the huge financial and human resources assigned for rural development actually used in an efficient way, are rural policy decisions able to adapt to the highly dynamic situation in the business and social life?

The dissertation examines the XII - IV centuries BC. The theopolitical and socio-cultural processes that took place in Greece, during which the genesis and historical development of politics spread. These processes are examined in the context of the history of ideas. Based on a complex analysis of research and historical sources, the genesis and historical development of ancient Greek politics is investigated, and the structure and dynamics of their driving forces are reconstructed. The dissertation analyzes the assumptions of the religious and cultural genesis of politics, the conflict of age groups, the relationship between power and authority, the interaction between the principles of order and forms of governance, as well as aspects of the political crisis.

The dissertation examines the XII - IV centuries BC. The theopolitical and socio-cultural processes that took place in Greece, during which the genesis and historical development of politics spread. These processes are examined in the context of the history of ideas. Based on a complex analysis of research and historical sources, the genesis and historical development of ancient Greek politics is investigated, and the structure and dynamics of their driving forces are reconstructed. The dissertation analyzes the assumptions of the religious and cultural genesis of politics, the conflict of age groups, the relationship between power and authority, the interaction between the principles of order and forms of governance, as well as aspects of the political crisis.

The dissertation examines the XII - IV centuries BC. The theopolitical and socio-cultural processes that took place in Greece, during which the genesis and historical development of politics spread. These processes are examined in the context of the history of ideas. Based on a complex analysis of research and historical sources, the genesis and historical development of ancient Greek politics is investigated, and the structure and dynamics of their driving forces are reconstructed. The dissertation analyzes the assumptions of the religious and cultural genesis of politics, the conflict of age groups, the relationship between power and authority, the interaction between the principles of order and forms of governance, as well as aspects of the political crisis.

The dissertation examines the XII - IV centuries BC. The theopolitical and socio-cultural processes that took place in Greece, during which the genesis and historical development of politics spread. These processes are examined in the context of the history of ideas. Based on a complex analysis of research and historical sources, the genesis and historical development of ancient Greek politics is investigated, and the structure and dynamics of their driving forces are reconstructed. The dissertation analyzes the assumptions of the religious and cultural genesis of politics, the conflict of age groups, the relationship between power and authority, the interaction between the principles of order and forms of governance, as well as aspects of the political crisis.

Common Agricultural Policy emerged as an attempt to secure important aspects of the economic recovery of post-war Europe. Over time Common Agricultural Policy substantially evolved; however, today this policy absorbs a significant part of the European Union's budget and attracts attention of policymakers, scientists, taxpayers and farmers due to inefficiency of policy tools. The current situation shows that there is a strong demand for improving the results of Common Agricultural Policy which could be achieved selecting the proper structure and tools for the Common Agricultural Policy post 2013. The paper is aiming at identifying the likely development directions of the Common Agricultural Policy structure and tools, which are based on the analysis of 2007-2013 Common Agricultural Policy problems, proposed Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020 models and the position of the EU members towards the future of Common Agricultural Policy.

Common Agricultural Policy emerged as an attempt to secure important aspects of the economic recovery of post-war Europe. Over time Common Agricultural Policy substantially evolved; however, today this policy absorbs a significant part of the European Union's budget and attracts attention of policymakers, scientists, taxpayers and farmers due to inefficiency of policy tools. The current situation shows that there is a strong demand for improving the results of Common Agricultural Policy which could be achieved selecting the proper structure and tools for the Common Agricultural Policy post 2013. The paper is aiming at identifying the likely development directions of the Common Agricultural Policy structure and tools, which are based on the analysis of 2007-2013 Common Agricultural Policy problems, proposed Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020 models and the position of the EU members towards the future of Common Agricultural Policy.

Common Agricultural Policy emerged as an attempt to secure important aspects of the economic recovery of post-war Europe. Over time Common Agricultural Policy substantially evolved; however, today this policy absorbs a significant part of the European Union's budget and attracts attention of policymakers, scientists, taxpayers and farmers due to inefficiency of policy tools. The current situation shows that there is a strong demand for improving the results of Common Agricultural Policy which could be achieved selecting the proper structure and tools for the Common Agricultural Policy post 2013. The paper is aiming at identifying the likely development directions of the Common Agricultural Policy structure and tools, which are based on the analysis of 2007-2013 Common Agricultural Policy problems, proposed Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020 models and the position of the EU members towards the future of Common Agricultural Policy.

Common Agricultural Policy emerged as an attempt to secure important aspects of the economic recovery of post-war Europe. Over time Common Agricultural Policy substantially evolved; however, today this policy absorbs a significant part of the European Union's budget and attracts attention of policymakers, scientists, taxpayers and farmers due to inefficiency of policy tools. The current situation shows that there is a strong demand for improving the results of Common Agricultural Policy which could be achieved selecting the proper structure and tools for the Common Agricultural Policy post 2013. The paper is aiming at identifying the likely development directions of the Common Agricultural Policy structure and tools, which are based on the analysis of 2007-2013 Common Agricultural Policy problems, proposed Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020 models and the position of the EU members towards the future of Common Agricultural Policy.

The article analyses the relationship between decision making and structural changes of New Public Governance. The authors emphasize that in the process of evolution of public governance, the effectiveness of preparation and implementation of decisions is a very complex, multi-dimensional issue. Its success is based on the entirety of elements and factors of both internal and external environments. Specific attention is given to application of meta-analysis, theoretical simulation, analog and other methods in analysis of decisionmaking external environment. It is proved that qualitative parameters of contemporary decisions in public sector are directly dependent on the pace of Public Governance evolution in establishment of new, more effective, innovative and democratic principles and methods of public sector governance. ; Straipsnyje analizuojama sprendimų sąveika su pokyčiais naujojo viešojo valdymo struktūroje. Akcentuojama, kad viešojo valdymo evoliucijoje sprendimų rengimo ir įgyvendinimo efektyvumas yra itin kompleksinė, daugiadimensė problema, kurios sėkmingą sprendimą lemia organizacijos vidinės ir išorinės aplinkos elementų ir veiksnių visuma. Straipsnyje itin daug dėmesio skiriama sprendimų rengimo išorinei aplinkai analizuoti, taikant metaanalizės, teorinio modeliavimo, analogų ir kt. metodus. Pagrįsta, kad šiuolaikinių sprendimų viešajame sektoriuje kokybiniai parametrai yra tiesiogiai priklausomi nuo viešojo valdymo evoliucijos tempų įtvirtinant naujus, efektyvesnius, inovatyvesnius ir demokratiškesnius viešojo sektoriaus valdymo principus ir nuostatas.

The article examines the concept of the Seimas (the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania) resolution, its legal force, and practices of constitutional proceedings. Scientific research is undertaken with the goal to reveal its essential characteristics, as well as to detect possible legal regulation gaps and practice-based issues of implementation. While analyzing the evolution of centuries-old state parliamentarism, the state of the Seimas resolution and (or) of equivalent legislation was identified in times of the Republic of Both Nations, the restoration of the state of Lithuania and of inter-war independent republic. Therefore, the Seimas resolution is the historical source of Lithuanian constitutional law. The concept of the Seimas resolution is enriched by its significance in March 1990, when the act of independence was adopted and published, as well as its direct provision in the constitution of 1992. This legal act addresses the relationship between the state authorities (distrust of government) and operational matters of the parliament itself (pre-term elections). The Seimas resolution is not an ordinary by-law. Having analysed more than twenty years of Lithuanian parliamentary experiences, the resolution should rather be considered as the primary means of expression of the political will of the Seimas. Depending on the importance of the issue, the will could be derived from the constitution itself and its principles, as well as from the representation of people's sovereignty. One of the most important areas of implementation of the Seimas resolution is the parliamentary oversight. By adopting respective resolutions, the Seimas may require reports from the accountable state authorities; it also may assess their performance or assign them various tasks. Some very important seimas resolutions (for example on elections results or impeachment petition to the constitutional court) could be voted with simple majority of participating members of seimas.

The article examines the concept of the Seimas (the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania) resolution, its legal force, and practices of constitutional proceedings. Scientific research is undertaken with the goal to reveal its essential characteristics, as well as to detect possible legal regulation gaps and practice-based issues of implementation. While analyzing the evolution of centuries-old state parliamentarism, the state of the Seimas resolution and (or) of equivalent legislation was identified in times of the Republic of Both Nations, the restoration of the state of Lithuania and of inter-war independent republic. Therefore, the Seimas resolution is the historical source of Lithuanian constitutional law. The concept of the Seimas resolution is enriched by its significance in March 1990, when the act of independence was adopted and published, as well as its direct provision in the constitution of 1992. This legal act addresses the relationship between the state authorities (distrust of government) and operational matters of the parliament itself (pre-term elections). The Seimas resolution is not an ordinary by-law. Having analysed more than twenty years of Lithuanian parliamentary experiences, the resolution should rather be considered as the primary means of expression of the political will of the Seimas. Depending on the importance of the issue, the will could be derived from the constitution itself and its principles, as well as from the representation of people's sovereignty. One of the most important areas of implementation of the Seimas resolution is the parliamentary oversight. By adopting respective resolutions, the Seimas may require reports from the accountable state authorities; it also may assess their performance or assign them various tasks. Some very important seimas resolutions (for example on elections results or impeachment petition to the constitutional court) could be voted with simple majority of participating members of seimas.