Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
The most important achievements in early post-Soviet Russia were the creation of a federal system & the establishment of scheduled elections. However, federalism in Russia substitutes rhetoric for reality with regard to many substantive elements of Western federalism. It is more a decorative ritual than a democratic function. This chapter examines the roots of Russian federalism, as far back as the 11th century, & its development in the post-Soviet era. It is concluded that Vladimir Putin does not want a system of political pluralism or development of grassroots parties. His vision for Russia is one of a vertical, not horizontal, chain of command, with a strong national police presence in control at the regional level. Figures. J. Stanton
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 1-16
ISSN: 0048-5950
In: The Cambridge Companion to the United States Constitution 185-223 (Karen Orren & John Compton, eds., 2018)
SSRN
In: Canadian Democratic Audit Series
Intro -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgments -- 1 Auditing Federalism in Canada -- 2 Federalism and Democracy -- 3 Canadian Federalism -- 4 Democratic Audit of Inclusiveness in the Federal System -- 5 Democratic Audit of Participation in the Federal System -- 6 Democratic Audit of Responsiveness in the Federal System -- 7 The Democratic Audit and Change in the Federal System -- 8 The Need for Change -- Discussion Questions -- Additional Reading -- Works Cited -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- Y.
In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY, N. Edward, ed., Zalta, 2003
SSRN
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 42, Heft 4, S. e4
ISSN: 0048-5950
In: Pouvoirs: revue française d'études constitutionnelles et politiques, Heft 66, S. 51
ISSN: 0152-0768
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 492-494
ISSN: 1744-9324
Federalism, Jennifer Smith, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004, pp. xi,
192.This slender volume is part of the Canadian Democratic Audit series
examining how well Canadian democracy is performing at the beginning of
the twenty-first century. The purpose is to investigate all major aspects
of the Canadian political system according two three benchmarks: public
participation, inclusiveness and responsiveness. The series includes ten
volumes in all. This is the one on federalism.
In: Peace & change: PC ; a journal of peace research, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 373-378
ISSN: 1468-0130
The articles in this special section address quite distinct aspects of the history of world federalism that, taken together, point to federalism (beyond an ideal, ideology, or social movement) as a process. It was one of many transnational social movements that can be understood as players in global politics. In this sense the federalist movement participated in the process it idealized—the creation of world governance beyond states.
In: Key concepts in American history
Federalism is a system of government in which the powers are shared between state and federal governments. Originating as the Albany Plan of Union by Benjamin Franklin in 1754, federalism has become a controversial issue throughout American history, as politicians and lawmakers continue to argue over which level of government should have more authority. Federalism discusses the people, court cases, and events relevant to this concept
In: American political science review, Band 41, Heft 6, S. 1142-1160
ISSN: 1537-5943
The net result of ten years of extraordinary activity is that the Supreme Court has gone a long way toward squaring the legal concept of American federalism with the intent—and, it is tempting to add, the plain language—of the Constitution. The most important thing that has happened is that the Court has snuffed out the heresy of "dual federalism." This subtle weapon of laissez-faire economics was utilized at a fairly early date, notably in the two child labor cases, to strike down federal reform legislation, but it achieved great weight, which comes with reiteration in important cases, during 1935 and 1936, when the Court was grimly determined to save the country from the horrors of the New Deal. Briefly, the doctrine holds that the mere existence of states constitutes an independent limitation on the exercise of national powers. Thus, Justice Day asserted in the first child labor case: "The grant of authority over a purely federal matter was not intended to destroy the local power always existing and carefully reserved to the States in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution." This theory is inconsistent with the principle of federal supremacy, a principle which the present Court has restored to its proper place in American constitutional law. But, in sustaining a sweeping exercise of national power, the Court has by no means been unmindful of the proper status of the states in the Union. Furthermore, it is a mistake to assume that every growth of national power is at the expense of state power. While it is true that we have more government at the federal level today than ever before, we also have much more state government. A fuller exploitation by Congress of the powers committed to it by the Constitution has been matched by a fuller exploitation of the authority reserved to the states. The laments of losing litigants should not be taken as a correct assessment of the present position of the American states.
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 1-23
ISSN: 1747-7107
This article provides a roadmap for what gender scholarship offers scholars of federalism. It argues that applying a gender perspective can enrich the field by introducing new concepts, questions, hypotheses, and debates. Gender scholarship's focus on power and change will also make theorizing about federalism more dynamic. The article shows how the "gendering democracy" project's indices will help scholars measure federalism's role in women's continuing political marginalization and incorporation. It also highlights the importance a gender perspective confers on social movements, social policies, and normative issues. Finally, the article speculates that gender analysis could promote a new research theme exploring how different state architectures affect and are affected by interactions between territorial and nonterritorial interests and identities. Adapted from the source document.