Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
World Affairs Online
FOREIGN POLICY - Issues in Foreign Policy
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 23
ISSN: 0031-3599
Our foreign policy
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 3, S. 331-337
ISSN: 0041-7610
IR/Foreign Policy Theory and German Foreign Policy
In: Journal of international relations and development, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 251-256
ISSN: 1581-1980
An introduction to this section on international relations & foreign policy. Adapted from the source document.
European Foreign Policy and Foreign Policy Analysis
In: Understanding European Foreign Policy, S. 170-178
Mexico's Foreign Policy—Indeed a Foreign Policy?
In: Journal of Interamerican studies and world affairs, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 85-92
ISSN: 2162-2736
EU Foreign Policy and National Foreign Policy
In: The Foreign Policy of the European Union, S. 116-134
IR/foreign policy theory and German foreign policy
In: Journal of international relations and development: JIRD, official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 251-292
ISSN: 1408-6980
Hellmann, G.: IR/foreign policy theory and German foreign policy. - S. 251-256 Hellmann, G.: Fatal attraction? German foreign policy and IR/foreign policy theory. - S. 257-292
World Affairs Online
Foreign Policy
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 43-48
ISSN: 1465-3923
We should not be surprised if we find each of the former republics of the Soviet Union placing foremost in their foreign policy the desire to achieve a truly recognized statehood. Obviously, developing their constitutions, and internal political and economic structures, is an internal matter, but it is closely related, of course, with the foreign policy that they can pursue. The principal aim of a foreign policy—just as perhaps the principal aim of an individual—is self-preservation. And once the entity has been created, either because of a long struggle of important forces within the society or, in a few cases, because independence is handed to them due to events elsewhere, the fact is that once you are independent you must act in a way that defends your independence. You defend the ability of whatever political system you have to make its own autonomous decisions. And I believe that what we are seeing today reflects this imperative. We see it most spectacularly, of course, in the jockeying of Russia and Ukraine within the Commonwealth of Independent States.
Foreign policy: thinking outside the foreign policy box
In: Insights, 1
This collection of essays by renowned scholar Amitai Etzioni aims to provoke reconsiderations of basic assumptions of foreign policy by students, academics and practitioners. With chapters focusing on the Middle East, China and the EU, as well as articles with a more global focus, the book offers thought-provoking and insightful perspectives on international foreign policy which challenge existing academic debate in the field. It will be of great interest to students, scholars and practitioners of foreign policy and international relations.
Review of Foreign Policy V - Foreign Policy for the Americas
Review of Foreign Policy V - Foreign Policy for the Americas
BASE
Soviet Foreign Policy Studies and Foreign Policy Models
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 704-733
ISSN: 1086-3338
American academic literature on foreign policy witnessed, in the 1960's, a continuing flow of studies of the Soviet case, as indeed of other cases. It also witnessed a flow of studies of another, newer, and broader type—studies of theoretical bent concerned with the construction of general analytical models of foreign policy behavior.
Foreign Policy from Khatami to Ahmadinejad There is One Foreign Policy in Iran, which is Khamenei's Foreign Policy
This Article is part of an MA thesis: "Iran Wilayat al Faqih System of Governance and Public Policymaking" which tried to investigate the challenges that public policy in Iran is facing under Wilayat al Faqih system of governance. The article here deals with foreign policy making in Iran from Khatami to Ahmadinejad in regards to both Iran regional roleand Iran-U.S. relations. It sheds light on the challenges that are facing Iranian foreign policy making which can affect both the regime and the ideology of Wilayat al Faqih itself. It also, discusses series of problems that are challenging the authority of the supreme leader which resulted in a power struggle between the supreme leader (representative of the Wilayat al Faqih institution) and the president (representative of the Republican institution) inside the system of governance when it comes to policymaking. The contradictory roles between both is a result of the president limited power in formulating foreign policies, together with his ideological preferences that is different from the supreme leader. The Article concludes by stating that such power struggle between the offices may impact Iran's domestic policies but not Iranian foreign policies, as Iran is becoming a regional power.
BASE
Foreign Policy
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 61-66
ISSN: 1465-3923
First VisionsDuring the Soviet period Estonia, like the other national republics of the USSR, lacked a foreign policy of her own. While foreign ministries did exist, they had just a symbolic function: staffed by only five or six people, they were allowed minimal cultural and trade contacts with the Western countries and limited inter-communist party ties within the Soviet bloc. They had to report to the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs on every move they made and served, first and foremost, as cover organizations for the KGB. Designing more substantive foreign policies in the Baltic Republics actually began before they gained independence in 1991. In 1989–1990, the emerging political parties voiced their first visions of the future of the Baltic States, which, generally speaking, boiled down to becoming sovereign democratic states, striving for friendly relations with all countries of the world. By that time, under the pressures of perestroika and glasnost, the Soviet authorities had been compelled to loosen their grip on the foreign contacts of the union republics. Those contacts, however, could not be called yet a foreign policy. They could, rather, be identified as isolated moves in the arena of international politics.