Suchergebnisse

The article ends with the conclusion that the foundation of the Lithuanian foreign policy must be its Western, not Eastern policy.

The article ends with the conclusion that the foundation of the Lithuanian foreign policy must be its Western, not Eastern policy.

The article ends with the conclusion that the foundation of the Lithuanian foreign policy must be its Western, not Eastern policy.

The article ends with the conclusion that the foundation of the Lithuanian foreign policy must be its Western, not Eastern policy.

Ongoing economic globalization processes of the late decades and the increasing integration of markets and societies have changed the world and the traditional intercourse among states. The importance of economic interests of countries is constantly rising. Academic literature often mentions and existing tension (competition) between politics and economics. That is why there is a question,- are these interests compatible or competing in Lithuania? The object of this study: Lithuanian economic interest representation and the interaction among economic and political interests of the state. Purpose: to find out how important are economic interests in the contemporary Lithuanian foreign policy; in what way and how much can they influence it. In order to implement the main purpose of this study these objectives are being met: To review the interpretation of the relation between economics and politics in the internationa relations discipline; To analyze which [and in what extent] economic interests are being mentioned in the most important foreign policy documents and what is their significance in those documents; To explore the institutionalization of economic interest representation; To identify the weaknesses of economic interest representation in foreign countries; To study the interaction between economic and political interests according to the most important Lithuanian foreign policy regional courses - Europe, CIS, Asia and America; To propose recommendations for the improvement of Lithuanian economic (diplomacy) foreign policy. Lithuanian economic interests in this study are considered as the promotion of common economic relations (foreign trade) and of the export of nations products and services; attracting of foreign direct investment, protection and representation of the interests of the national economy subjects. After implementing the objectives of this study the following conclusions were derived: • The ongoing globalization processes transform the foreign policies of many countries. Representation of economic interests is becomming one of its essential elements. • Since the regaining of independency economic and foreign policy were considered as two different areas. Membership in the EU has highlighted the importance of economic interest representation and the necessity to integrate them into the common foreign policy. • Lithuanian institutions, responsible for shaping and implementing foreign policy, consider economic interests in different ways; • Lithuania has adopted the competetive model of economic diplomacy; • Lithuanian economic diplomacy has the following weaknesses: - Lack of coordination among the most important institutions which shape and implement economic diplomacy; - The absence of a unified Lithuanian economic diplomacy strategy; - No "country marketing" (image strategy, country branding) has been created yet; - The lack of "aggression" in Lithuanian diplomats who coordinate economic affairs; - Failing communication among businessmen and diplomats; In order to improve the representation of Lithuanian economic interests and their protection in foreign countries the following measures ought to be implemented: • Protect the national interests in the EU more actively; • Reduce the tensions between politics and economics in the cases of Russia and Belarus; • Significantly strengthen the diplomatic-economic representation in Asian countries; • Use good political relations and the transatlantic partnership in achieving economic aims in America;. • Improve the coordination of actions among the institutions which implement economic diplomacy; • Regulate and separate the functions of the institutions implementing economic diplomacy more clearly; • Create a unified strategy for the representation of Lithuanian economic interests. • Pay more attention to economic diplomacy as a discipline in universities.

Ongoing economic globalization processes of the late decades and the increasing integration of markets and societies have changed the world and the traditional intercourse among states. The importance of economic interests of countries is constantly rising. Academic literature often mentions and existing tension (competition) between politics and economics. That is why there is a question,- are these interests compatible or competing in Lithuania? The object of this study: Lithuanian economic interest representation and the interaction among economic and political interests of the state. Purpose: to find out how important are economic interests in the contemporary Lithuanian foreign policy; in what way and how much can they influence it. In order to implement the main purpose of this study these objectives are being met: To review the interpretation of the relation between economics and politics in the internationa relations discipline; To analyze which [and in what extent] economic interests are being mentioned in the most important foreign policy documents and what is their significance in those documents; To explore the institutionalization of economic interest representation; To identify the weaknesses of economic interest representation in foreign countries; To study the interaction between economic and political interests according to the most important Lithuanian foreign policy regional courses - Europe, CIS, Asia and America; To propose recommendations for the improvement of Lithuanian economic (diplomacy) foreign policy. Lithuanian economic interests in this study are considered as the promotion of common economic relations (foreign trade) and of the export of nations products and services; attracting of foreign direct investment, protection and representation of the interests of the national economy subjects. After implementing the objectives of this study the following conclusions were derived: • The ongoing globalization processes transform the foreign policies of many countries. Representation of economic interests is becomming one of its essential elements. • Since the regaining of independency economic and foreign policy were considered as two different areas. Membership in the EU has highlighted the importance of economic interest representation and the necessity to integrate them into the common foreign policy. • Lithuanian institutions, responsible for shaping and implementing foreign policy, consider economic interests in different ways; • Lithuania has adopted the competetive model of economic diplomacy; • Lithuanian economic diplomacy has the following weaknesses: - Lack of coordination among the most important institutions which shape and implement economic diplomacy; - The absence of a unified Lithuanian economic diplomacy strategy; - No "country marketing" (image strategy, country branding) has been created yet; - The lack of "aggression" in Lithuanian diplomats who coordinate economic affairs; - Failing communication among businessmen and diplomats; In order to improve the representation of Lithuanian economic interests and their protection in foreign countries the following measures ought to be implemented: • Protect the national interests in the EU more actively; • Reduce the tensions between politics and economics in the cases of Russia and Belarus; • Significantly strengthen the diplomatic-economic representation in Asian countries; • Use good political relations and the transatlantic partnership in achieving economic aims in America;. • Improve the coordination of actions among the institutions which implement economic diplomacy; • Regulate and separate the functions of the institutions implementing economic diplomacy more clearly; • Create a unified strategy for the representation of Lithuanian economic interests. • Pay more attention to economic diplomacy as a discipline in universities.

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

The thesis focus is 'Pakistani foreign policy' in regard to the 'global war on terror'. Pakistan being a frontline state in war on terror always remained in focus of international community. Pakistan with its actions in war on terror failed to fulfill expectations of international community. This led to international allegations on Pakistan regarding its role in war on terror. The allegations were e.g. "Pakistan have double standards in war on terror". The thesis aims are to explore the reasons of dual-face foreign policy of Pakistan, outcomes of such policies and current directions of Pakistani foreign policy in war on terror. In the effort of researching the topic, the research tasks are composed of 'presenting the theory of Realism as being suitable theoretical ground for the study; presentation of the historical context of Pakistani foreign policy pre 9/11; analysis of Pakistani foreign policy combating terrorism after 9/11; analyzing the Pakistan's role creating terrorism in respect of international allegations; and evaluation of Pakistan's current role in global war on terror'. The study is based on the analysis of the scientific literature. The qualitative research methods such as content analysis, comparison method, historical method, descriptive method and media monitoring are mainly used in the thesis. Considering the Pakistan's geographic position, its geo-political problems with neighbors, power balance, regional arm race, security dilemma problem considering these factors the case study was conducted using Realism theoretical perspective. The next chapters were efforts to establish a point where the current position and future directions of Pakistani foreign policy in respect of its war on terror could be explored. Finally, the last part of the thesis constitutes the major conclusions of the research study. The thesis proved that Pakistan remained an active member of international community in war on terror but due to its geographic position was forced to establish dual-face policies in war. The different approach was due to the difference of interests. It was the matter of survival for the Pakistan. December 16, 2014 Peshawar school attacks, changed Pakistani approach towards terrorism. Pakistan current foreign policy is very clear to eliminate the terrorism without exceptions. The use of non-state actors by states became an international norm. The South Asia region might continue to see such events in future but groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Taliban do not have any soft place in current Pakistani foreign policy. Current Pakistani foreign policy categorizes global war on terror, a war for its own survival.

The thesis focus is 'Pakistani foreign policy' in regard to the 'global war on terror'. Pakistan being a frontline state in war on terror always remained in focus of international community. Pakistan with its actions in war on terror failed to fulfill expectations of international community. This led to international allegations on Pakistan regarding its role in war on terror. The allegations were e.g. "Pakistan have double standards in war on terror". The thesis aims are to explore the reasons of dual-face foreign policy of Pakistan, outcomes of such policies and current directions of Pakistani foreign policy in war on terror. In the effort of researching the topic, the research tasks are composed of 'presenting the theory of Realism as being suitable theoretical ground for the study; presentation of the historical context of Pakistani foreign policy pre 9/11; analysis of Pakistani foreign policy combating terrorism after 9/11; analyzing the Pakistan's role creating terrorism in respect of international allegations; and evaluation of Pakistan's current role in global war on terror'. The study is based on the analysis of the scientific literature. The qualitative research methods such as content analysis, comparison method, historical method, descriptive method and media monitoring are mainly used in the thesis. Considering the Pakistan's geographic position, its geo-political problems with neighbors, power balance, regional arm race, security dilemma problem considering these factors the case study was conducted using Realism theoretical perspective. The next chapters were efforts to establish a point where the current position and future directions of Pakistani foreign policy in respect of its war on terror could be explored. Finally, the last part of the thesis constitutes the major conclusions of the research study. The thesis proved that Pakistan remained an active member of international community in war on terror but due to its geographic position was forced to establish dual-face policies in war. The different approach was due to the difference of interests. It was the matter of survival for the Pakistan. December 16, 2014 Peshawar school attacks, changed Pakistani approach towards terrorism. Pakistan current foreign policy is very clear to eliminate the terrorism without exceptions. The use of non-state actors by states became an international norm. The South Asia region might continue to see such events in future but groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Taliban do not have any soft place in current Pakistani foreign policy. Current Pakistani foreign policy categorizes global war on terror, a war for its own survival.

The thesis focus is 'Pakistani foreign policy' in regard to the 'global war on terror'. Pakistan being a frontline state in war on terror always remained in focus of international community. Pakistan with its actions in war on terror failed to fulfill expectations of international community. This led to international allegations on Pakistan regarding its role in war on terror. The allegations were e.g. "Pakistan have double standards in war on terror". The thesis aims are to explore the reasons of dual-face foreign policy of Pakistan, outcomes of such policies and current directions of Pakistani foreign policy in war on terror. In the effort of researching the topic, the research tasks are composed of 'presenting the theory of Realism as being suitable theoretical ground for the study; presentation of the historical context of Pakistani foreign policy pre 9/11; analysis of Pakistani foreign policy combating terrorism after 9/11; analyzing the Pakistan's role creating terrorism in respect of international allegations; and evaluation of Pakistan's current role in global war on terror'. The study is based on the analysis of the scientific literature. The qualitative research methods such as content analysis, comparison method, historical method, descriptive method and media monitoring are mainly used in the thesis. Considering the Pakistan's geographic position, its geo-political problems with neighbors, power balance, regional arm race, security dilemma problem considering these factors the case study was conducted using Realism theoretical perspective. The next chapters were efforts to establish a point where the current position and future directions of Pakistani foreign policy in respect of its war on terror could be explored. Finally, the last part of the thesis constitutes the major conclusions of the research study. The thesis proved that Pakistan remained an active member of international community in war on terror but due to its geographic position was forced to establish dual-face policies in war. The different approach was due to the difference of interests. It was the matter of survival for the Pakistan. December 16, 2014 Peshawar school attacks, changed Pakistani approach towards terrorism. Pakistan current foreign policy is very clear to eliminate the terrorism without exceptions. The use of non-state actors by states became an international norm. The South Asia region might continue to see such events in future but groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Taliban do not have any soft place in current Pakistani foreign policy. Current Pakistani foreign policy categorizes global war on terror, a war for its own survival.

The article deals with the issue on Russian foreign policy in length of one year - from September 2001 till October 2002. It's evident, that the attacks of terrorists on the Twin Towers in New York signalled the turn in Russian foreign policy under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin from confrontation with USA and Euro Atlantic organizations.

The article deals with the issue on Russian foreign policy in length of one year - from September 2001 till October 2002. It's evident, that the attacks of terrorists on the Twin Towers in New York signalled the turn in Russian foreign policy under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin from confrontation with USA and Euro Atlantic organizations.