Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Quartino -- Dedication -- Table of contents -- List of abbreviations -- Introduction -- Part I - Defining state secrecy -- Chapter 1 - State secrecy in domestic legal systems -- Chapter 2 - State secrecy in the international legal system -- Part II - State secrecy and the international protection of human rights -- Chapter 3 - State secrecy and treaty monitoring bodies'practice -- Chapter 4 - State secrecy beyond treaties: towards a customary norm prohibiting recourse to state secrecy to conceal gross human rights violations? -- Part III - Theoretical and practical issues arising from the horizoantal and vertical interaction among norms and legal orders -- Chapter 5 - From state to international organisation secrecy -- Chapter VI - To disclose or not to disclose state secrets? The dilemmas of interstate cooperation in the field of intelligence, diplomacy, and mutual legal assistence -- General conclusions -- Bibliography -- Printed by.

The essay focuses on the dialogue between Parliaments and Courts with a particular interest on the role that representative assemblies can play in protecting human rights in relation with the Courts' activity. Due to their democratic legitimacy, parliaments fulfill a particularly relevant function in protecting and promoting human rights, and they should fulfill it more and more. Hence, the importance in each legal system to define efficient mechanism of parliamentary control on human rights in the light of jurisprudence of the Courts and in particular of the Court of Strasburg. Among the most significant experiences, the English experience and the role played by the Joint Committee on Human Rights in the light of the Human Rights Act 1998 are analyzed.

This article addresses the right to conscientious objection as a general constitutional right. Such a right is not different from the right to freedom of conscience, which corresponds to its foundation and justification. In the case of the right to conscientious objection, the reference to its constitutionality represents its source of legitimacy, but also limits its source of legitimacy, but also limits its exercise. These restrictions depend on the respect for other constitutional values and on the reasonability of the discrepancy between personal values and duties imposed by law. The right to conscientious objection does not necessarily have to be recognized by a legislator; it may well be acknowledged by judges. The latter seems the most appropriate context because the right to conscientious objection is to privacy against public power, even when respecting constitutional values. ; El artículo hace referencia al derecho de objeción de conciencia como un derecho constitucional general. Tal derecho no difiere del derecho a la libertad de conciencia que constituye su .fundamento y justificación. En el caso del derecho a la objeción de conciencia, la referencia a la Constitución representa su fuente de legitimidad, pero también un límite a su ejercicio. Estas restricciones dependen del respeto a otros valores constitucionales y de la razonabilidad de la entre los valores personales y los deberes impuestos por la ley. No necesariamente el derecho a la objeción de conciencia tiene que ser reconocido por el legislador; puede muy bien ser acogido por los jueces. Esto último parece lo más apropiado puesto que la razón del derecho a la objeción de conciencia es un defender la privacidad contra el poder público incluso en relación con valores constitucionales.

L'opera parte dalla constatazione della frequente occorrenza di violazioni di diritti umani nell'ambito delle attività economiche delle imprese e, dopo avere fatto luce brevemente sull'origine e l'evoluzione dei concetti sottesi all'espressione business and human rights, individua precisi obiettivi e quesiti di ricerca, relativi alla responsabilità delle società madri e delle società committenti ed ai potenziali impatti negativi sui diritti umani degli Investor-State Contracts

Preliminary Material /H.-C. Günther and A.A. Robiglio -- Introduction /H.-C. Günther -- Chapter I. Haben die Wörter "人 (ren, Mensch)\' in der Frühlings- und Herbstzeit/im Zeitalter der Kämpfenden Reiche (770–221 volumes Chr) sowie "homme\' im neuzeitlichen und modernen Französischen stets die umfassende Bedeutung "Mensch" im Sinne der Universalen Erklärung der Menschenrechte vom 10. Dezember 1948? /Harro von Senger -- Chapter II. Der Mensch Zwischen Selbsterkenntnis und Erkenntnis des Selbst in buddhistisch-christlicher Perspektive /Michael Fuss -- Chapter III. Gottesebenbildlichkeit und Gottesstellvertreterschaft in islamischen Menschenrechtsbegründungen /L. Richter-Bernburg -- Chapter IV. Das stoische Gesetz der Natur und seine Rezeption bei Cicero /Robert Bees -- Chapter V. La donna romana, fra vita reale e letteratura /Paolo Fedeli -- Chapter VI. Enea e Turno: il duello finale /Paolo Fedeli -- Chapter VII. Das Leiden der Liebe: Zur Unveränderlichkeit und Leidensfähigkeit des christlichen Gottes /Markus Enders -- Chapter VIII. Humanization In Late Antique And Byzantine Philosophy /Dominic J. O' Meara -- Chapter IX. Individual Rights And Common Good: Henry Of Ghent And The Scholastic Origins Of Human Rights /Pasquale Porro -- Chapter X. Aristotelian \'Scientia\' And The Medieval \'Artes\' /Charles Lohr -- Chapter XI. Nicholas Of Cusa And The Anthropology Of Peace /Paul Richard Blum -- Chapter XII. Giordano Bruno's Criticism Of Globalization /Elisabeth Blum -- Chapter XIII. La dignité de l'homme chez Dante: une question preliminaire /Andrea A. Robiglio -- Chapter XIV. Figuren des Menschen bei Dante: Ulisse /Ruedi Imbach -- Chapter XV. Dante's Commedia And Goethe's Faust. Similarities And Differences /Vittorio Hösle -- Chapter XVI. A Jesuit Comedy On The Morality Of Soldiers /Paul Richard Blum -- Chapter XVII. Kunst und Technik Bei Martin Heidegger /Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann -- Chapter XVIII. Martin Heideggers Auslegung des Menschen als Zoon logon echon bei Aristoteles /Bodgan Minca -- Chapter XIX. Sein Zum Tode: Tolstoj Versus Heidegger /Tatiana Shchyttsova -- Chapter XX. Europe Between Agony And Hope: Christianity, History And Violence In María Zambrano /Giusi Strummiello -- Chapter XXI. Intergeneratives oder gemeinschaftliches Leben? Eine radikalphänomenologische Skizze /Rolf Kühn -- Chapter XXII. Brain-Computer-Interface (BCI) In Paralysis /Niels Birbaumer , Ander Ramos Murguialday , Moritz Wildgruber and Leonardo G. Cohen -- Chapter XXIII. Intelligent Technical Systems: Can They Surpass Human Skills? /Dieter Roller -- List Of Contributors /H.-C. Günther and A.A. Robiglio -- Index /H.-C. Günther and A.A. Robiglio.

Cover -- Occhiello -- Dedica -- Table of Contents -- Foreword -- Table of Abbreviations -- Table of Cases -- 1. Introduction to the Human Right to Life -- 2. The Reach of the ECtHR's Jurisdiction -- 3. The Obligation to Protect 'Everyone's Right to Life' by Law -- 4. Death Penalty: From Permission to Prohibition -- 5. Permitted Uses of Lethal Force -- Appendices -- Select Bibliography.

URL del artículo en la web de la Revista: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/lex_social/article/view/3483 ; Il testo, contributo a un convegno organizzato da Massimo La Torre a Catanzaro nel giugno 2017 propone un minimo di idealismo per il futuro dei diritti umani sociali nell¿UE. Si parte dai rischi di esauribilità di tolleranza e solidarietà che minacciano l¿universalità dei diritti. Per affrontare le sfide opposte del fondamentalismo e del nichilismo dei diritti, occorre prendere sul serio il dovere di mitezza come precondizione morale dei principi e valori fondamentali della costituzione dai quali derivano gli altri doveri costituzionali. La lunga storia costituzionale di tolleranza e solidarietà non finisce oggi. Il graduabile dovere di solidarietà offre garanzie multilevel alla sostenibilità dei diritti. In particolare, il nuovo Pilastro Europeo dei Diritti Sociali offre un¿opportunità di rafforzamento della solidarietà sociale europea che potrebbe essere necessario per il consolidamento del Fiscal compact. Un minimo di ottimismo porta a concludere che i diritti umani non possono non essere anche diritti sociali e che i diritti sociali non possono non essere anche diritti umani ; The paper, contribution to a congress organized by Massimo La Torre in Catanzaro in June 2017, proposes a minimum of idealism for the future of social human rights within the EU. Starting point is that risks of exhausted tolerance and solidarity seem to undermine the universality of human rights as a basis of the European fundamental rights discourse. Fundamentalism and nihilism need to be faced by taking more seriously the duty of meekness as a moral precondition of the fundamental principles and values of the constitution that imply other constitutional duties. The long constitutional history of tolerance and solidarity is not yet finished. The gradual duty of solidarity grants multilevel guarantees to the sustainability of the social human rights. The new Social Rights Pillar of the EU could offer an opportunity for strengthening European social solidarity that could be necessary and required for the consolidation of the Fiscal compact. A minimum of optimism brings to the conclusion that human rights need to be also social rights and social rights need to be also human rights. ; Universidad Pablo de Olavide