Suchergebnisse

Problem. The current system of industrial policy does not provide the possibility to save an existing industrial capacity and its scientific and technological base, make structural changes consciously protect and support domestic producers. Analysis of recent publications and sources. The development of industrial policy developed in some areas of public life and were on the agenda lawyers executives such as D. V. Zadyhaylo, V. K. Mamutov, V. M. Pashkov, A. P. Podtserkovnyy, V. A. Volodya, V. S. Shcherbina more. However, scientists do not specify enough attention paid generalization of industrial policy and its impact on the economy as a whole. Formulation purposes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current state and trends of the industry of Ukraine and industrial policy in general. The main material. Thus the basis for strategic policy, its basic principle should be the implementation of public policies aimed at introducing innovative model of structural adjustment and economic growth, strengthening of Ukraine as a high-tech state. The main objective of macroeconomic policy strategy – ensuring the conditions for sustainable long-term growth, which supports innovative structural and social reorientation of the economy, creating a favorable investment environment. This requires maintaining the principle of priority of macroeconomic stabilization. We must take into account the feedback – the dependence of the macroeconomic balance efficiency policy of economic growth. The experience of the previous decade shows that robust fiscal and monetary stabilization without stable real economy is not possible, it may be only short-term. Conclusions. Obviously, to emerge from the crisis in the domestic industry must take effective macroeconomic controls that would entail certain preferences to domestic producers, implement measures to improve the structure of the resource potential of the industry, primarily concerned innovative component, including appropriate legal support that should be sufficient to meet the objectives of the competitiveness of industrial enterprises and their products. ; Исследованы вопросы развития промышленности Украины в контексте промышленной политики государства, еѐ становление, современное состояние и тенденции развития. Рассмотрены разные правовые формы влияния на становление промышленности Украины, особенно промышленной политики государства в разных отраслях народного хозяйства. ; Досліджено питання розвитку промисловості України в контексті сучасної промислової політики держави, її становлення, сучасний стан та тенденції розвитку. Розглянуто різні правові форми впливу на становлення промисловості України та, зокрема, промислової політики держави в різних галузях народного господарства.

Problem. The current system of industrial policy does not provide the possibility to save an existing industrial capacity and its scientific and technological base, make structural changes consciously protect and support domestic producers. Analysis of recent publications and sources. The development of industrial policy developed in some areas of public life and were on the agenda lawyers executives such as D. V. Zadyhaylo, V. K. Mamutov, V. M. Pashkov, A. P. Podtserkovnyy, V. A. Volodya, V. S. Shcherbina more. However, scientists do not specify enough attention paid generalization of industrial policy and its impact on the economy as a whole. Formulation purposes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current state and trends of the industry of Ukraine and industrial policy in general. The main material. Thus the basis for strategic policy, its basic principle should be the implementation of public policies aimed at introducing innovative model of structural adjustment and economic growth, strengthening of Ukraine as a high-tech state. The main objective of macroeconomic policy strategy – ensuring the conditions for sustainable long-term growth, which supports innovative structural and social reorientation of the economy, creating a favorable investment environment. This requires maintaining the principle of priority of macroeconomic stabilization. We must take into account the feedback – the dependence of the macroeconomic balance efficiency policy of economic growth. The experience of the previous decade shows that robust fiscal and monetary stabilization without stable real economy is not possible, it may be only short-term. Conclusions. Obviously, to emerge from the crisis in the domestic industry must take effective macroeconomic controls that would entail certain preferences to domestic producers, implement measures to improve the structure of the resource potential of the industry, primarily concerned innovative component, including appropriate legal support that should be sufficient to meet the objectives of the competitiveness of industrial enterprises and their products. ; Исследованы вопросы развития промышленности Украины в контексте промышленной политики государства, еѐ становление, современное состояние и тенденции развития. Рассмотрены разные правовые формы влияния на становление промышленности Украины, особенно промышленной политики государства в разных отраслях народного хозяйства. ; Досліджено питання розвитку промисловості України в контексті сучасної промислової політики держави, її становлення, сучасний стан та тенденції розвитку. Розглянуто різні правові форми впливу на становлення промисловості України та, зокрема, промислової політики держави в різних галузях народного господарства.

Problem. The current system of industrial policy does not provide the possibility to save an existing industrial capacity and its scientific and technological base, make structural changes consciously protect and support domestic producers. Analysis of recent publications and sources. The development of industrial policy developed in some areas of public life and were on the agenda lawyers executives such as D. V. Zadyhaylo, V. K. Mamutov, V. M. Pashkov, A. P. Podtserkovnyy, V. A. Volodya, V. S. Shcherbina more. However, scientists do not specify enough attention paid generalization of industrial policy and its impact on the economy as a whole. Formulation purposes. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current state and trends of the industry of Ukraine and industrial policy in general. The main material. Thus the basis for strategic policy, its basic principle should be the implementation of public policies aimed at introducing innovative model of structural adjustment and economic growth, strengthening of Ukraine as a high-tech state. The main objective of macroeconomic policy strategy – ensuring the conditions for sustainable long-term growth, which supports innovative structural and social reorientation of the economy, creating a favorable investment environment. This requires maintaining the principle of priority of macroeconomic stabilization. We must take into account the feedback – the dependence of the macroeconomic balance efficiency policy of economic growth. The experience of the previous decade shows that robust fiscal and monetary stabilization without stable real economy is not possible, it may be only short-term. Conclusions. Obviously, to emerge from the crisis in the domestic industry must take effective macroeconomic controls that would entail certain preferences to domestic producers, implement measures to improve the structure of the resource potential of the industry, primarily concerned innovative component, including appropriate legal support that should be sufficient to meet the objectives of the competitiveness of industrial enterprises and their products. ; Исследованы вопросы развития промышленности Украины в контексте промышленной политики государства, еѐ становление, современное состояние и тенденции развития. Рассмотрены разные правовые формы влияния на становление промышленности Украины, особенно промышленной политики государства в разных отраслях народного хозяйства. ; Досліджено питання розвитку промисловості України в контексті сучасної промислової політики держави, її становлення, сучасний стан та тенденції розвитку. Розглянуто різні правові форми впливу на становлення промисловості України та, зокрема, промислової політики держави в різних галузях народного господарства.

Роботу виконано на кафедрі міжнародної інформації ВДУ ім. Лесі Українки ; Аналізуються основні напрями промислової та технологічної політики ЄС. Подано дані офіційної статистики ЄС. Розкрито завдання та проблеми даної галузі.

У статті висвітлені деякі проблеми формування військово-технічної та оборонно-промислової політики України на сучасному етапі. Визначені проблемні питання стосовно прагнення України щодо вступу в НАТО. ; The article highlights some problems of formation of the military-technical and defence-industrial policy of Ukraine at the present stage. Some problematic issues regarding Ukraine's aspirations for joining NATO are identified.

У статті висвітлені деякі проблеми формування військово-технічної та оборонно-промислової політики України на сучасному етапі. Визначені проблемні питання стосовно прагнення України щодо вступу в НАТО. ; The article highlights some problems of formation of the military-technical and defence-industrial policy of Ukraine at the present stage. Some problematic issues regarding Ukraine's aspirations for joining NATO are identified.

The article has discussed the features of the formation and development of the industrial sphere in the territory of today's Ukraine, considering the cyclical nature of the passage of socio-economic processes, starting from the time of the fall of the feudal system and the transition to capitalist relations (second half of the 19th century). The evolution of the formation of the fuel and metallurgical base in the Dnieper and Donbas's with the participation of foreign capital has been investigated. The main priorities of centralized management and planning during the five-year period of accelerated industrialization (1928-1932) have been described. The achievements of the Ukrainian industry on the eve of the independence of the state (1991) have been emphasized - from mining to the creation of high-tech industries (space, aviation, shipbuilding, transport engineering, etc.). The problems of the industrial complex functioning (deindustrialization of the economy, a shortage of qualified personnel, critical dependence on the export of raw materials, low resource efficiency, etc.) has been analyzed. The theoretical foundations of the industrial policy formation in the conditions of transformation processes in the economy, the convergence of economic models of Ukraine and the EU countries have been improved. The international best practice of managing changes in the industrial sphere in the conditions of competition, strengthening manifestations of protectionism in the world market has been summarized. Measures have been developed to enhance the process of entering domestic enterprises to the global added value chains, which will contribute to expanding access to international markets, attracting FDI, and modernizing technologies. The expediency of introducing effective organizational forms of supporting business projects and innovations in the industry, increasing responsibility for the development, adoption, and implementation of engineering, business and management decisions has been substantiated. Recommendations on improving the national industrial policy with a focus on the comprehensive and sustainable development of industrial production to further strengthen the economic security of the state have been proposed. ; The article has discussed the features of the formation and development of the industrial sphere in the territory of today's Ukraine, considering the cyclical nature of the passage of socio-economic processes, starting from the time of the fall of the feudal system and the transition to capitalist relations (second half of the 19th century). The evolution of the formation of the fuel and metallurgical base in the Dnieper and Donbas's with the participation of foreign capital has been investigated. The main priorities of centralized management and planning during the five-year period of accelerated industrialization (1928-1932) have been described. The achievements of the Ukrainian industry on the eve of the independence of the state (1991) have been emphasized - from mining to the creation of high-tech industries (space, aviation, shipbuilding, transport engineering, etc.). The problems of the industrial complex functioning (deindustrialization of the economy, a shortage of qualified personnel, critical dependence on the export of raw materials, low resource efficiency, etc.) has been analyzed. The theoretical foundations of the industrial policy formation in the conditions of transformation processes in the economy, the convergence of economic models of Ukraine and the EU countries have been improved. The international best practice of managing changes in the industrial sphere in the conditions of competition, strengthening manifestations of protectionism in the world market has been summarized. Measures have been developed to enhance the process of entering domestic enterprises to the global added value chains, which will contribute to expanding access to international markets, attracting FDI, and modernizing technologies. The expediency of introducing effective organizational forms of supporting business projects and innovations in the industry, increasing responsibility for the development, adoption, and implementation of engineering, business and management decisions has been substantiated. Recommendations on improving the national industrial policy with a focus on the comprehensive and sustainable development of industrial production to further strengthen the economic security of the state have been proposed.

The article has discussed the features of the formation and development of the industrial sphere in the territory of today's Ukraine, considering the cyclical nature of the passage of socio-economic processes, starting from the time of the fall of the feudal system and the transition to capitalist relations (second half of the 19th century). The evolution of the formation of the fuel and metallurgical base in the Dnieper and Donbas's with the participation of foreign capital has been investigated. The main priorities of centralized management and planning during the five-year period of accelerated industrialization (1928-1932) have been described. The achievements of the Ukrainian industry on the eve of the independence of the state (1991) have been emphasized - from mining to the creation of high-tech industries (space, aviation, shipbuilding, transport engineering, etc.). The problems of the industrial complex functioning (deindustrialization of the economy, a shortage of qualified personnel, critical dependence on the export of raw materials, low resource efficiency, etc.) has been analyzed. The theoretical foundations of the industrial policy formation in the conditions of transformation processes in the economy, the convergence of economic models of Ukraine and the EU countries have been improved. The international best practice of managing changes in the industrial sphere in the conditions of competition, strengthening manifestations of protectionism in the world market has been summarized. Measures have been developed to enhance the process of entering domestic enterprises to the global added value chains, which will contribute to expanding access to international markets, attracting FDI, and modernizing technologies. The expediency of introducing effective organizational forms of supporting business projects and innovations in the industry, increasing responsibility for the development, adoption, and implementation of engineering, business and management decisions has been substantiated. Recommendations on improving the national industrial policy with a focus on the comprehensive and sustainable development of industrial production to further strengthen the economic security of the state have been proposed. ; The article has discussed the features of the formation and development of the industrial sphere in the territory of today's Ukraine, considering the cyclical nature of the passage of socio-economic processes, starting from the time of the fall of the feudal system and the transition to capitalist relations (second half of the 19th century). The evolution of the formation of the fuel and metallurgical base in the Dnieper and Donbas's with the participation of foreign capital has been investigated. The main priorities of centralized management and planning during the five-year period of accelerated industrialization (1928-1932) have been described. The achievements of the Ukrainian industry on the eve of the independence of the state (1991) have been emphasized - from mining to the creation of high-tech industries (space, aviation, shipbuilding, transport engineering, etc.). The problems of the industrial complex functioning (deindustrialization of the economy, a shortage of qualified personnel, critical dependence on the export of raw materials, low resource efficiency, etc.) has been analyzed. The theoretical foundations of the industrial policy formation in the conditions of transformation processes in the economy, the convergence of economic models of Ukraine and the EU countries have been improved. The international best practice of managing changes in the industrial sphere in the conditions of competition, strengthening manifestations of protectionism in the world market has been summarized. Measures have been developed to enhance the process of entering domestic enterprises to the global added value chains, which will contribute to expanding access to international markets, attracting FDI, and modernizing technologies. The expediency of introducing effective organizational forms of supporting business projects and innovations in the industry, increasing responsibility for the development, adoption, and implementation of engineering, business and management decisions has been substantiated. Recommendations on improving the national industrial policy with a focus on the comprehensive and sustainable development of industrial production to further strengthen the economic security of the state have been proposed.

The article has discussed the features of the formation and development of the industrial sphere in the territory of today's Ukraine, considering the cyclical nature of the passage of socio-economic processes, starting from the time of the fall of the feudal system and the transition to capitalist relations (second half of the 19th century). The evolution of the formation of the fuel and metallurgical base in the Dnieper and Donbas's with the participation of foreign capital has been investigated. The main priorities of centralized management and planning during the five-year period of accelerated industrialization (1928-1932) have been described. The achievements of the Ukrainian industry on the eve of the independence of the state (1991) have been emphasized - from mining to the creation of high-tech industries (space, aviation, shipbuilding, transport engineering, etc.). The problems of the industrial complex functioning (deindustrialization of the economy, a shortage of qualified personnel, critical dependence on the export of raw materials, low resource efficiency, etc.) has been analyzed. The theoretical foundations of the industrial policy formation in the conditions of transformation processes in the economy, the convergence of economic models of Ukraine and the EU countries have been improved. The international best practice of managing changes in the industrial sphere in the conditions of competition, strengthening manifestations of protectionism in the world market has been summarized. Measures have been developed to enhance the process of entering domestic enterprises to the global added value chains, which will contribute to expanding access to international markets, attracting FDI, and modernizing technologies. The expediency of introducing effective organizational forms of supporting business projects and innovations in the industry, increasing responsibility for the development, adoption, and implementation of engineering, business and management decisions has been substantiated. Recommendations ...

Досліджено роль державної промислової політики та її співвідношення із загальною економічною політикою в перехідній економіці. Визначено шляхи вирішення основних проблем промислової політики та концепцію державної промислової політики. Досліджено сучасні тенденції розвитку кластерної політики в регіоні. ; The improvement of the efficiency of industrial production in a region under conditions of innovative economy is inextricably linked to the promotion of innovative industrial activities in the region. Specific implementation of the main directions of the state cluster policy based on strategic planning and program methods for the formation and development of industrial and innovative clusters requires the clarification of methodological approaches to local solving of this problem. However, some issues concerning legal regulation of the creation and development of innovative forms of management remain poorly studied. In the article the role of the state industrial policy and its relationship with general economic policy in terms of, on the one hand, modernization and determination of innovative development of the economy as the mainstream of society development and, on the other hand, ongoing process of further deepening of economy market orientation is considered. The ways of solving of the basic problems of industrial policy, namely legislative reforms, policy in specific industrial sectors, investment policy, energy and environmental policy, policy in improving the competitiveness of enterprises and industries in domestic and international markets; regional development policy; trade liberalization; policy in the field of industrial cooperation between developed countries and countries with transition economies are determined. The basic problem of modern industrial policy is to create socio-economic and legal conditions for restructuring and conversion of large, medium and small industrial enterprises on the basis of new highly efficient forms of production that can provide a high level of innovative activity activation. The generalization and analysis of existing methods of the formation and construction of industrial clusters in our country and abroad make it possible to clarify the basic methodological positions of the formation and development of innovative clusters and industrial enterprises. The improvement of the state industrial policy in the conditions of postindustrial society should aim at the creation of necessary conditions for the introduction of scientific and technological progress in the activities of large, medium and small industrial enterprises in all economic sectors. The main stages to achieve this goal should include primarily legal transformation; restructuring of economic environment; balance of effective collaboration of both public and private industrial enterprises; technical and social restructuring.

The improvement of the efficiency of industrial production in a region under conditions of innovative economy is inextricably linked to the promotion of innovative industrial activities in the region. Specific implementation of the main directions of the state cluster policy based on strategic planning and program methods for the formation and development of industrial and innovative clusters requires the clarification of methodological approaches to local solving of this problem. However, some issues concerning legal regulation of the creation and development of innovative forms of management remain poorly studied. In the article the role of the state industrial policy and its relationship with general economic policy in terms of, on the one hand, modernization and determination of innovative development of the economy as the mainstream of society development and, on the other hand, ongoing process of further deepening of economy market orientation is considered. The ways of solving of the basic problems of industrial policy, namely legislative reforms, policy in specific industrial sectors, investment policy, energy and environmental policy, policy in improving the competitiveness of enterprises and industries in domestic and international markets; regional development policy; trade liberalization; policy in the field of industrial cooperation between developed countries and countries with transition economies are determined. The basic problem of modern industrial policy is to create socio-economic and legal conditions for restructuring and conversion of large, medium and small industrial enterprises on the basis of new highly efficient forms of production that can provide a high level of innovative activity activation. The generalization and analysis of existing methods of the formation and construction of industrial clusters in our country and abroad make it possible to clarify the basic methodological positions of the formation and development of innovative clusters and industrial enterprises. The improvement of the state industrial policy in the conditions of postindustrial society should aim at the creation of necessary conditions for the introduction of scientific and technological progress in the activities of large, medium and small industrial enterprises in all economic sectors. The main stages to achieve this goal should include primarily legal transformation; restructuring of economic environment; balance of effective collaboration of both public and private industrial enterprises; technical and social restructuring. ; Досліджено роль державної промислової політики та її співвідношення із загальною економічною політикою в перехідній економіці. Визначено шляхи вирішення основних проблем промислової політики та концепцію державної промислової політики. Досліджено сучасні тенденції розвитку кластерної політики в регіоні.

The machine-tool industry is fundamental for the industrialization of the industry since it produces the means of production of those machines and mechanisms by which the above-mentioned process is carried out. It means that the level of development of the machine-tool industry directly affects the ability of the community to build an industrial society. Therefore, special attention is paid to this sector of production in the research works on the history of industry, engineering and machine-tool construction. Meanwhile, the corresponding historiography of the Soviet period contains certain facts that do not always correlate in various sources of historiographical material and contradict information from archival sources. Thus, all researchers who in one way or another studied the development of machine-tool construction on the territory of Ukraine were unanimous in the fact that the branch of metal-cutting equipment manufacturing was formed undoubtedly at the stage of industrialization, and during the pre-Soviet period, it did not exist here. At the same time, Soviet historians disagree only in the issue of when and by whom that formation was started: a republican government in the second half of the 1920s or a Union government in the early 1930s. However, according to archival documents, by the time of the establishment of Soviet power, material and technical basis had been already formed in Ukraine, and the creation of a staffing component of the scientific and technical potential of regional machine-tool construction had been started. Although at the same time, it should be admitted that during that period, the Ukrainian sphere of metal-cutting equipment manufacturing had not yet received an effective organizational order, and its scientific and technical support was absent at all. Moreover, at the beginning of the 1920s, the mentioned problems were not only far from being overcome, but in general, almost complete destruction of the branch scientific and technical potential took place. Therefore, the author comes to the conclusion that the situation took such turn due to an absolute absence at that time of any conceptual views of the governments of the USSR and Ukrainian SSR about the place of Ukrainian machine-tool construction in the development of the Union or Republic machinery-producing complexes. The suppression of specified circumstances by Soviet historiography can just be explained by the political and ideological conditions in which the researchers lived during their studies. ; У статті досліджено динаміку стану верстатобудівного виробництва в Українській РСР у першій половині 1920-х років. Виявлено факт викривлення відображення даного стану радянською історіографією та причини, що спонукали до цього попереднє покоління дослідників. Встановлено, що спроби республіканського уряду у другій половині 1920-х років, а також заходи союзного партійно-господарського керівництва зі створення верстатобудівної сфери в УСРР на початку 1930-х років дійсно відбувалися на тлі практичної відсутності відповідного галузевого науково-технічного потенціалу. Проте одночасно з'ясовано, що вказана ситуація стала не наслідком хибної промислової політики уряду Російської імперії, а прорахунків радянської влади при формуванні засад своєї промислової політики на початку 1920-х років.

UK: У статті визначено, що при реалізації державної антикризової стратегії розвитку реального сектору економіки слід орієнтуватися на структурну перебудову промислового комплексу на основі інноваційної моделі розвитку та враховувати наслідки економічної кризи в Україні. Розроблені напрями антикризової стратегії взаємопов'язані та доповнюють один одного. Зокрема структурна перебудова у реальному секторі економіки має пріоритетне значення та передбачає орієнтування на розвиток передових галузей промисловості, державне стимулювання наукомістких і високотехнологічних виробництв, ефективне використання науково-технічних розробок. EN:The article stipulates that the formation of the state industrial policy should focus on the restructuring of the industrial complex based on innovative development model and consider the consequences of the economic crisis in Ukraine. Directions industrial policy are interrelated and complementary. In particular, the restructuring of the industrial sector is very important for the national economy and provides guidance on the development of priority sectors of industry, government incentives and knowledge-intensive high-tech industries, full and effective use of scientific and technical developments. The modern state's role in implementing anti-crisis strategy of the real economy is to create the optimal structure of production and industrial infrastructure that meets the full cycle of innovation and investment; ensuring formation of balanced legal framework for the effective development of industry and accelerated industrial development through expanded investment, further increasing internal and external markets.

In the article the directions of development of enterprises of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine, the foundations of a new industrial policy in the scientific and technological development, given the task of Industrial Policy of Ukraine, presented microeconomic analysis of the enterprises of the military-industrial complex, set limits on the nature of technological enterprises. ; В статье определены направления развития предприятий оборонно-промышленного комплекса Украины, основы новой промышленной политики в условиях научно-технологического развития, представлены задания промышленной политики предприятий Украины, подано микроэкономический анализ предприятий оборонно-промышленного комплекса, определены ограничения технологического характера на предприятиях. ; В статті визначено напрями розвитку підприємств оборонно-промислового комплексу України, основи нової промислової політики в умовах науково-технологічного розвитку, подано завдання промислової політики підприємств України, подано мікроекономічний аналіз стану підприємств оборонно-промислового комплексу, визначено обмеження технологічного характеру на підприємствах.

The subject of the research is theoretical and methodological basis of the state policy of national economy industrialization. The purpose of the research is to identify the main directions and propose mechanisms for rebuilding the industrial potential of Ukraine through public policy measures. Methods of research. To achieve the research objectives, the method of system–structural analysis was used to generalize the tools of new industrial policy in Ukraine and the method of economic– mathematical modeling for the preliminary assessment of the effects proposed measures implementation. Results of the work. The article analyzes the prospects of attracting national manufacturers for implementation of a number of government programs aimed to develop infrastructure utilities. The paper reveals the reasons why the state demand is not used effectively to stimulate the domestic industrial development. It also proposes a package of legislative instruments for improving the state economic policy to ensure accelerated development of high–tech industry in Ukraine. This package suggests the following top priority measures: introduction of localization requirements in public procurement, expansion of investment incentives for industrial parks residents, free of charge connection to utilities for industrial facilities, revision of import duty rates and introduction of export duties on raw materials, the launch of an export–credit agency, the opening of a network of trade missions at embassies abroad. Application of results. Solving problems of Ukrainian industrial development in the legislative sphere; formation of a favorable regulatory environment for improving the investment climate in Ukraine. Conclusions. 1) the key driving force behind the re–industrialization of the Ukrainian economy is the use of state resources in the field of public procurement, which should be aimed at supporting domestic production; 2) national development projects for the modernization of obsolete infrastructure and communal facilities should ...