Opponents of states and capital must be prepared to defend ourselves. To understand the nature of the state is to know that it will attack to kill when and where it feels a threat to its authority and power. But the struggles against exploitation, oppression, and repression must also move to the offensive. With the emboldening of reactionary forces on the far Right, there has been a renewed focus on issues of community self-defense, not only against the violence of the state but against organized fascists and Right-wing vigilantes alike. There has also been a developing seriousness, particularly among anarchist and antifascist, or antifa, activists. The goal of all anarchism is not to eliminate violence in social struggle (a futile and impossible pursuit given the nature of the state), but to limit the amount, degree, and extent of violence and harm inflicted by state agents, and their vigilante supporters, on the poor, oppressed, and exploited. And this is part of the emphasis on insurrectionary infrastructures. Non-material (emotional) and material resources and spaces are necessary to defend communities and workplaces under attack, but also to organize possible, and necessary, offensives. Insurrectionary Infrastructures reflects on strategies and tactics of rebellion and resistance and offers suggestions for fighting to win
This book provides a general overview of the concerns and efforts of the federal government in assuring the reliable function of the nation's critical infrastructures. It also discusses administrative issues, issues associated with sharing information between government agencies and between the federal government and the private sector
The darkness that came from the Mediterranean Sea covered the city hated by the procurator. М. Bulgakov. The Master and MargaritaThe seventh airfield subzone covered our beloved city. Construction was stopped, and engineering was frozen. Now we have as much free time as we need. And while Irkutsk is struggling with the mistakes of previous administrations, let's see how new air terminals are opened one by one in the regional capitals of the country: Kemerovo, Saratov, Perm. The first one we saw was LEONOV in Kemerovo. And we saw it not online, but live, when we arrived at the Festival "Zodchestvo in Siberia".The object of the issue is not a frequent section in PB. This issue contains several significant infrastructure facilities by Moscow authors. Airport terminals in three Russian regional capitals (41) and the Nizhegorodskaya transport hub in Moscow (63).The main Siberian festival of this autumn is a regular festival "Zodchestvo in Siberia" held in the first decade of September in Kemerovo (15-36). It is noteworthy that the main focus of the work of the key speakers of this festival, Nikolay Shumakov and Timur Bashkaev, is on transport infrastructure facilities. So the stars are aligned for us to talk about it, about INFRASTRUCTURE.The infrastructural crisis has hit fully half of the inhabited world. The gigantic transport, energy and information systems created in the middle of the last century have exhausted their resources. Mikhail Mishustin's government is adopting an ambitious plan to invest tens of trillions of rubles into the country's infrastructures. Joe Biden's government is discussing a similar plan that costs trillions of dollars. Meanwhile, it turns out that both the philosophy and methodology of infrastructure design have fundamentally changed and now require a deep rethinking. Along with the burning issues, however, we do not forget about anniversaries. The new issue of PB opens with a diptych devoted to the 80th anniversary of our regular author Alexander Rappaport. ; Тьма, пришедшая со Средиземного моря, накрыла ненавидимый прокуратором город…М. Булгаков «Мастер и Маргарита»Седьмая аэродромная подзона накрыла любимый нами город. Остановилось строительство, замерло проектирование. Свободного времени стало столько, сколько надобно. И пока Иркутск борется с ошибками предыдущих администраций, посмотрим, как один за другим открываются новые, поименованные, аэровокзалы региональных столиц страны – Кемерова, Саратова, Перми… Первым мы увидели кемеровский ЛЕОНОВ, причем увидели не он-лайн, а живьем, прилетев на фестиваль ЗВС.Объект номера – не частая рубрика в пб. В этом номере сразу несколько значительных объектов инфраструктуры московских авторов. Аэровокзалы трех российских региональных столиц (41) и столичный транспортно-пересадочный узел «Нижегородская» (63).Главный сибирский праздник этой осени – очередной фестиваль ЗВС, прошедший в первой декаде сентября в Кемерове (15–36). Интересно, что ключевые спикеры этого фестиваля – Николай Шумаков и Тимур Башкаев – в своем творчестве сосредоточены на объектах транспортной инфраструктуры. Так звезды встали, указывая нам, что самое время поговорить о ней, об ИНФРАСТРУКТУРЕ.Инфраструктурный кризис накрыл добрую половину обитаемого мира. Гигантские транспортные, энергетические, информационные системы, созданные в середине прошлого века, выработали свой ресурс. Правительство Михаила Мишустина принимает амбициозный план вложений десятков триллионов рублей в инфраструктуры страны. Правительство Джо Байдена обсуждает аналогичный план стоимостью в триллионы долларов. Тем временем выясняется, что и философия, и методология проектирования инфраструктуры кардинально поменялись и требуют глубокого переосмысления.Впрочем, за злобой дня мы не забываем и о юбилеях. Новый номер пб открывается диптихом, посвященным 80-летнему юбилею нашего постоянного автора Александра Раппапорта.
In: Forum for development studies: journal of Norwegian Institute of International Affairs and Norwegian Association for Development, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 473-499
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses the structure of local government in Germany. The entry forms part of the LoGov Report on Germany. To access the full version of the report on Germany, other practices regarding the structure of local government and to receive more information about the project, please visit: https://www.logov-rise.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823961.
Ehrlich, E.: International tendencies. Infrastructure and services in Hungary. S. 7-54. ... Fleischer, T.: To connect economies: Conditions for sustainable energy utilization. S. 89-130. Csaki, G.: Paper or plastic? S. 167-198
OpenAIRE is an open service infrastructure whose assets may vary during its lifetime in order to add/update functionalities or add/provide content. Examples are the additions of re3data, OpenDOAR, DOAJ or funder databases to collect content or the interoperation with SYGMA Cordis Portal and other databases and registries to deliver content. If such dynamicity is one of the most powerful features of the OpenAIRE infrastructure, to achieve its full potential, sustainability, and in respect of European legislation, it has to be constrained by precise rules and an established vision. The OpenAIRE Infrastructure Policy Board (IPB) is a body in charge of establishing the policies ruling the infrastructure ecosystem over time in terms of: (i) terms required by extra services to be included in the infrastructure ecosystem (e.g. QoS), (ii) terms required by new content providers to be aggregated in the information space (e.g. OpenAIRE guidelines, SLAs), (iii) OpenAIRE content acquisition policies defining the range/typology of content that will be included in the information space and relative Terms of Agreement, (iv) Service Level Agreements, and (iv) the IPR issues related with reuse of OpenAIRE data and services (e.g. license, "credit and citation policy").
OpenAIRE is an open service infrastructure whose assets may vary during its lifetime in order to add/update functionalities or add/provide content. Examples are the additions of re3data, OpenDOAR, DOAJ or funder databases to collect content or the interoperation with SYGMA Cordis Portal and other databases and registries to deliver content. If such dynamicity is one of the most powerful features of the OpenAIRE infrastructure, to achieve its full potential, sustainability, and in respect of European legislation, it has to be constrained by precise rules and an established vision. The OpenAIRE Infrastructure Policy Board (IPB) is a body in charge of establishing the policies ruling the infrastructure ecosystem over time in terms of: (i) terms required by extra services to be included in the infrastructure ecosystem (e.g. QoS), (ii) terms required by new content providers to be aggregated in the information space (e.g. OpenAIRE guidelines, SLAs), (iii) OpenAIRE content acquisition policies defining the range/typology of content that will be included in the information space and relative Terms of Agreement, (iv) Service Level Agreements, and (iv) the IPR issues related with reuse of OpenAIRE data and services (e.g. license, "credit and citation policy").