Suchergebnisse
Filter
85 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Colloquium: 26-29 XI 1975 ; V lustrum : [journées d'études internationales
In: Anciens pays et assemblées d'états 70
Behavior and institutions under economic reform: price regulation and market behaviour in Hungary
In: Tinbergen Research Series no. 46
Functioning and supervision of international financial institutions: Executive summary = Arbeitsweise und Beaufsichtigung der internationalen Finanzinstitutionen
In: Economic Affairs Series, 118A
World Affairs Online
Institutions and regional development in Southeast Asia: a comparative analysis of Satun (Thailand) and Perlis (Malaysia)
In: Netherlands geographical studies 374
Forster, Andrea G. (2021). Navigating educational institutions. Mechanisms of educational inequality and social mobility in different educational systems. ICS-dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam. ISBN/EAN: 978-94-6416-281-3
In: Mens & maatschappij: tijdschrift voor sociale wetenschappen, Band 97, Heft 1, S. 72-75
ISSN: 1876-2816
De rechtvaardigheidstheorie van John Rawls (2)
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political science ; official journal of the Dutch Political Science Association (Nederlandse Kring voor Wetenschap der Politiek), Band 12, Heft 1, S. 25-76
ISSN: 0001-6810
Two ambiguities in the theory of just institutions are explored. If the "fair value of political liberty" is given the weight Rawls claims it should be given, an egalitarian interpretation of justice as fairness emerges. In that case, the lexical ordering of the two principles of justice is impaired, & restrictions in the total system of liberties may be needed to maintain the fair value of political liberty. The difference principle is shown to have two interpretations: the familiar maximin rule & a principle of "compensating inequalities," which are derived from Rawl's contribution curve analysis. This is the principle Rawls uses in his theory of just institutions. However, it is the maximin rule that Rawls seeks to derive from the original position. This derivation is deficient, owing to Rawls's unconvincing argument for an "as-if" risk aversion of rational contractors. Given different "as-if" risk preferences, one can arrive at a utilitarian contract, within the framework of Rawls's original position. The relation between justice as fairness & Rawls's account of civil disobedience is analyzed. Rawls uses the lexical priority rules to decide when civil disobedience is justified, & excludes infractions of the difference principle. This exclusion, while possibly convincing in a strictly egalitarian interpretation of justice as fairness, cannot successfully be defended. Modified HA.
Les communautés rurales, 5, Europe occidentale (II) et Amérique = Western Europe (II) and America. Synthèse générale = General synthesis
In: Recueils de la Société Jean Bodin pour l'Histoire Comparative des Institutions 44