Suchergebnisse

SECTION I: GENERAL OVERVIEW 1. LEGAL SOURCES 1.1. Intellectual Property 1.1.1. International Conventions 1.1.2. EU Law: Approximation of Laws and Community Rights 1.1.3. National Legislation 1.1.4. Institutional Competences 1.2. International Jurisdiction 1.2.1. EU Law: Scope of Application and Grounds of Jurisdiction 1.2.2. International Conventions 1.2.3. National Legislation 1.3. Choice-of-Law 1.3.1. International Conventions 1.3.2. EU Law: Implications of the new Regulations 1.3.3. National Legislation 1.4. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 1.4.1. International Conventions 1.4.2. EU Law 1.4.3. National Legislation 2. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 2.1. International Jurisdiction 2.1.1. Infringement Claims 2.1.2. Contractual Disputes 2.1.3. Exclusive Jurisdiction on Validity of Rights Subject to Registration 2.2. Applicable Law 2.2.1. Infringement of IP Rights 2.2.2. Territoriality and lex loci protectionis 2.2.3. Contracts Relating to Intellectual or Industrial Property Rights 2.3. Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments 2.3.1 Procedural Issues 2.3.2 Grounds for Non-Recognition SECTION II: HYPOTHETICAL CASE STUDIES Case 1. General Special Grounds of Jurisdiction Case 2. Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Case 3. Consolidation of Proceedings Case 4. Choice of Court Case 5. Parallel Proceedings Case 6. Principle of Territoriality (Choice of Law) Case 7. Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights Case 8. Applicable Law to Initial Ownership Case 9. Applicable Law to the Transfer of Rights Agreements Case 10. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Case 11. Provisional Measures and Injunctions

The work aims to analyze the theoretical aspects of the use of information technologies in the mediation process, as well as the aspects of its implementation. The purpose of the investigation is online mediation as a form of resolution of intellectual property disputes. In addition, the topic of study is the social relationships that arise when using information technologies and mediation to resolve civil conflicts in the field of intellectual property. The research methods used in this case are the dialectical method, the generalization method, the comparison method, the analysis method, the synthesis method, the method in administration and the deduction method, the modeling method, and the abstraction method. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn on the state of online mediation in the real world, the benefits and potential problems of introducing virtual mediation for disputed parties, the need for support for special applications, along with the need for the introduction of online mediation at the state level to a state policy.

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that in Ukraine under martial law the system of protection of intellectual property rights and mechanisms of its public administration is continuously transformed, which implies a scientific search to identify the problems that exist in this area and the development of effective practical solutions to overcome them. The purpose of the study was to identify the main features and obstacles arising in the implementation of public administration in the field of intellectual property and the implementation of protection of its objects under martial law in Ukraine. The research methods used were general and special legal methods of knowledge. Everything allows to conclude that there is an urgent need to develop new mechanisms of digital security of copyrights and to push forward the creation of blockchain accounting of copyright objects. Similarly, a revision of the approach to the evaluation of objects of intellectual property rights and the determination of the inventive level is needed, as a condition of possibility to adapt the legislation governing the matter to the needs of today's society.

The value of intellectual property is now growing by the day in view of globalization of economic processes and integration of the Russian Federation into the world economy. The need for development of legislation in the field of intellectual property, improvement of legal mechanisms to protect the intellectual deliverables is dictated by a market economy, changes in social relations, as well as the inconsistency of regulatory enforcement, which prevents from proper implementation of the individual's rights in the sphere of intellectual property realization. Over the past decade, the entrepreneurial activity has demonstrated an increase in a number of facts of recognition of the intellectual property created by an employee as work for hire (WFH). Under these procedures, both employers and employees often make mistakes that subsequently lead to such items being non-protectable. The point is that the current legislation has no procedure or criteria to recognize the intellectual property created by employees as WFH. However, failure to observe the procedures regulated by tax legislation when recognizing the results of an employee's intellectual activity as WFH poses a high risk for instituting administrative action against the employer. In this paper, we will try to determine the procedure and criteria for recognizing the results of an employee's intellectual activity as WFH.

Fast improvement of the IT field requires relevant safety of intellectual assets rights. The legal protection of laptop applications, software programs and foreign legal practices is a contentious issue. With the rapid development of the IT sector within the international context, the issues of copyright safety, patenting and non-disclosure of personal data have gained urgency. The research methodology involved the use of methods of analysis and synthesis, logical and system - structural analysis, control methods, structural and functional analysis in combination with the method of case study and the method of content analysis. The article comprehensively analyses the modern perspective of intellectual belongings proper and copyright in IT outsourcing. The scope of unconventional challenges in the sphere of copyright safety inside the area of IT sphere are exemplified using the case of Ukraine. The case addresses opportunities to enhance the regulatory framework for copyright safety of experts engaged in IT outsourcing. It is stressed that the existing legal procedures and methods are slower in responding to changes in the field of IT outsourcing than the world's quickest trends in this sphere.

In modern conditions of development of public relations, the creation of objects of intellectual property rights by artificial intelligence is becoming more widespread. With this in mind, it is important to analyze the international legal experience of regulating the use of artificial intelligence as the author of intellectual property, to further borrow it for domestic laws, as well as to pay attention to problematic aspects of such regulation and make proposals to resolve inconsistencies. The study clarifies the international legal regulation of intellectual property rights created by artificial intelligence, as well as analyses the problematic issues of regulation of artificial intelligence by international law and the features of such regulation in Ukraine and presents positions on the development of artificial intelligence systems and prospects, as well as the prospects for its impact on world society.

Summary The discussion on the fundamentals that legitimise intellectual property often focuses on two main approaches: iusnaturalists and utilitarists. The former argue that it is possible to justify ownership of intellectual creation by relying on John Locke's liberal property theory. The latter converge around the so-called "progress clause" and the incentive argument. This work analyses whether or not intellectual property can be justified on the basis of such approaches, concluding that, given the paradoxes identified, these are insufficient. ; Resumen La discusión sobre los fundamentos que legitiman la propiedad intelectual se suele centrar alrededor de dos grandes planteamientos: iusnaturalistas y utilitaristas. Los primeros sostienen que es posible justificar la propiedad sobre la creación intelectual recurriendo a la teoría liberal de la propiedad formulada por John Locke. Los segundos convergen en torno a la llamada "cláusula del progreso" y el argumento de los incentivos. En este trabajo se analiza si es posible o no justificar la propiedad intelectual sobre la base de dichos planteamientos, concluyendo que, dadas las paradojas identificadas, éstos resultan insuficientes.

Understanding the role and necessity of the use of intellectual property in the field of medicine is the basis for the proper development of this field in the postwar period, as well as for the entire healthcare system. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine the impact and prospects of the use of intellectual property in the development of the Ukrainian health sector, post-war. The methodological basis of the work consists of general and special scientific methods: analysis and synthesis, generalization, dialectical, axiological, legal-formal, legal-comparative and structural system. The result of the work shows the necessity of using heterogeneous objects of intellectual property, in particular, those in the field of copyrights and patents, for adequate reform and effective modernization of the health sector. It is concluded that intellectual property is designed not only to ensure the property and non-property interests of the subject of the specified property, but, in addition, is intended to ensure the needs of society in general in the appropriate sphere, where the objects of intellectual property find their concrete application.

The modern society necessitates the introduction of new IT-solutions to meet its needs. With the spread of know-how, the need for its detailed analysis with the further determination of the direction of development. The purpose is to carry out an analysis of the introduction and functioning of know-how, as well as to determine the vectors of its use, taking into account the needs of participants in legal relations arising in this area. The subject of research – information technologies (know-how) as objects of intellectual property rights in their use. The methodological basis consists of the method of analysis, the method of synthesis, the dialectical method, the comparative-legal method, the system method, and the logical-legal method. The result of this work is to identify the importance of the information technologies in everyday life of modern society and the level of popularity of their use, outlining possible vectors of development in the economics in the direction of digitalization and justification of the need to improve the provisions of current legislation within the considered topic, expressing the idea of the direction of innovative information policy in the direction of active use of blockchain and maximum compliance with the protection of personal data of customers.

The article aims to explore the relationships that arise with respect to intellectual property rights in sports. The objectives of the article are to establish points of contact between intellectual property law and sports, as well as a detailed analysis of relevant public relations in terms of intellectual property law and sports law. To achieve the objectives of the article, the authors used a number of scientific methods, among which the main methods are analysis, synthesis and comparative-legal method. The authors of the study concluded that modern sport is developing in close intertwining with intellectual property rights, because only in this way can a sports spectacle be conveyed to a wide range of spectators and consumers in a broad sense. In addition, the range of points of contact between intellectual property and sports law is constantly growing and such can now be called not only patents and trademarks in sports, but also copyright, "image" rights, know-how in sports and the like.

Introduction: Protection of intellectual property rights using current legal mechanisms has as its main objective to encourage invention and innovation, facilitating commercial exploitation. On the other hand, free competition has the mission of promoting, protecting and guaranteeing the freedom to compete in order to ensure the efficient functioning of the market and consumer welfare. Methods: The authors completed a bibliographic review using journal databases and collections of Honduran and foreign laws regarding intellectual property and the right to free competition with respect to exclusive rights. Results: We show characteristics, differences, points of divergence and convergence between the two Honduran legal bodies and consider the importance of achieving a balance of the common goals pursued by these legal figures. Conclusion: There exists a need to make legislation known to the public and follow up with continuous improvement of such legislations to promote the collective well-being of the country, companies, and consumer; this resulting, ideally in the introduction of greater competitiveness to the market, promotion of innovation, a more efficient economy and above all to ensure consumer welfare; a right that the State must guarantee. ; Introducción: La protección de los derechos de propiedad intelectual usando los mecanismos legales actuales, tiene como su principal objetivo incentivar la inventiva y la innovación, facilitando la explotación comercial. Por otra parte, la libre competencia tiene la misión de promover, proteger y garantizar la libertad para competir a fin de procurar el funcionamiento eficiente del mercado y el bienestar del consumidor. Métodos: Se hizo revisión bibliográfica en bases de revistas y en colección de leyes hondureñas y extranjeras referentes a la propiedad intelectual y el derecho de libre competencia con respecto a los derechos exclusivos. Desarrollo: Se muestran características, diferencias, puntos de divergencia y convergencias entre ambos estamentos legales de Honduras, en donde se considera la importancia de lograr un equilibrio de los fines comunes que persiguen estas figuras jurídicas. Conclusión: Debe socializarse y seguir una mejora continua de dicha legislación para procurar el bienestar colectivo (país, empresas, consumidores) introduciendo mayor competitividad al mercado, impulso de la innovación e invención, economía más eficiente, y sobre todo velar por el bienestar del consumidor, derecho que el Estado debe garantizar.

This document makes an analysis of intellectual property from its origins to the chapters in Free Trade Agreements (WIPO-plus), which includes a review of the role of different international organizations concerned with intellectual property, a review of discussions that are at the origin of the WTO inmatters related to intellectual property (TRIPS), an analysis of intellectual property as a market failure. We propose that Intellectual Property has evolved from inexistent protection to rigid legislation that favors the interests of the economies of economic powers. It also suggests that the evolution of the Intellectual Property system contradicts the initial objectives of promoting scientific production, artistic creation and transfer of technology to promote development, turning it into a monopoly of knowledge ; En este documento se analiza la Propiedad Intelectual (PI) desde sus orígenes hasta los capítulos en los Tratados de Libre Comercio (ADPIC-plus), se hace un recuento del papel de diferentes instituciones internacionales relacionadas con la PI, se revisan las discusiones que dieron origen a la OMC en referencia a la PI (ADPIC), se estudia la Propiedad Intelectual como una falla demercado, se plantea que la evolución del sistema de PI contradice los propósitos iniciales de fomentar la producción científica, la creación artística, y la transferencia de tecnología para estimular el desarrollo, convirtiéndose, en cambio, en una herramienta para el monopolio del conocimiento.

Con el propósito de fomentar la generación, el uso adecuado y gestión del conocimiento propio y de terceros, en el desarrollo de las funciones misionales, investigación, docencia y extensión de la Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, se adopta este Reglamento de Propiedad Intelectual como referente normativo articulado con la Política de Propiedad Intelectual, los estatutos universitarios, el Proyecto Educativo Institucional (PEI) y demás normas que respaldan el quehacer institucional, con el objetivo de brindar tratamiento armónico a los aspectos de la propiedad intelectual (PI) que rodean los procesos artísticos, culturales, académicos, investigativos y de extensión de la Institución. El presente reglamento se rige por la Constitución Política de Colombia, los tratados internacionales ratificados por Colombia, las leyes, decretos y demás normas que regulen el uso y aseguramiento de la propiedad intelectual, aplicables a las relaciones de generación de conocimiento, cooperación y asociación que efectúe en desarrollo de las funciones la Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga. ; Título primero: principios y generalidades de la propiedad intelectual Capítulo primero: principios orientadores Capítulo segundo: generalidades de la propiedad intelectual en la Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga Título segundo: sujetos y titularidad de la propiedad intelectual Capítulo primero: de los sujetos y participantes Capítulo segundo de los contratistas Capítulo tercero: de la titularidad y derechos patrimoniales Capítulo cuarto: negociación de creadores y reparto de utilidades Título tercero: mecanismos de protección Capítulo primero: de los mecanismos de protección Título cuarto: Producciones Inte4lectuales Capítulo primero De la producción de estudiantes, profesores y administrativos Capítulo segundo: de las tesis y trabajos de grado Capítulo tercero: publicación Capítulo cuarto: transferencia y uso de la propiedad intelectual Capítulo quinto: uso de contenidos en la web, software, y correo institucional Título quinto: Comité de propiedad intelectual Capítulo primero: comité de propiedad intelectual y funciones Capítulo segundo: instancias de aseguramiento Capítulo tercero: disposiciones finales y vigencia ; With the purpose of promoting the generation, proper use and management of one's own knowledge and that of third parties, in the development of missionary functions, research, teaching and extension of the Autonomous University of Bucaramanga, this Intellectual Property Regulation is adopted as a normative reference articulated with the Intellectual Property Policy, the university statutes, the Institutional Educational Project (PEI) and other norms that support the institutional work, with the aim of providing harmonious treatment to the aspects of intellectual property (IP) that surround the artistic processes , cultural, academic, investigative and extension of the Institution. This regulation is governed by the Political Constitution of Colombia, the international treaties ratified by Colombia, the laws, decrees and other norms that regulate the use and assurance of intellectual property, applicable to the relations of generation of knowledge, cooperation and association that carry out in development of the functions the Autonomous University of Bucaramanga.

[EN] The participation of the teaching staff in the direction of work in the university field raises several questions in relation to the protection of copyright. The orientation, lines to follow, as well as the dedication and involvement in the writing of the students' work are not considered as an object protected by intellectual property, neither in the applicable legislation nor in the internal regulations of Polytechnic University of Valencia. We propose in this work a reflection on the participation of teachers, a rethinking of the definition of direction, as well as the drafting of a contract between students and teachers to delimit the participation and protection of the work ; [ES] La participación del profesorado en la dirección de trabajos en el ámbito universitario plantea diversas cuestiones en relación con la protección de los derechos de autor. La orientación, líneas a seguir, así como la dedicación e implicación en la redacción del trabajo del alumnado no se contemplan como objeto protegido por la propiedad intelectual, ni en la legislación aplicable, ni en la normativa interna de la Universitat Politècnica de València. Proponemos en este trabajo una reflexión sobre la participación del profesorado, un replanteamiento de la definición de dirección, así como la redacción de un contrato entre alumnado y profesorado para delimitar la participación y protección de la obra. ; Trabajo realizado en el marco del Proyecto I+D+i «Retos investigación» del Programa estatal de I+D+i orientado a los Retos de la Sociedad del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades: RTI2018-097354-B-100 (2019-2022), Proyecto de I+D+i Retos MICINN ¿Derechos y garantías frente a las decisiones automatizadas en entornos de inteligencia artificial, IoT, big data y robótica¿ (PID2019-108710RB-I00, 2020-2022). Investigador principal: Dr. D. Lorenzo Cotino Hueso. Catedrático de Derecho Constitucional. Universitat de València, y en el Proyecto de Innovación y Mejora Educativa (PIMEs) concedido por el Vicerrectorado de Estudios ...