Liberal Intergovernmentalism (LI) is the contemporary "baseline" social scientific and historiographic theory of regional integration—especially as regards the European Union. It rests on three basic assumptions, which in turn support a three-stage theoretical model of integration and the elaboration of numerous distinctive causal mechanisms. Considerable historical and social scientific evidence supports the LI view, but room also remains for scholars to extend and elaborate its framework in promising ways. Three prominent criticisms of LI exist. Some scholars of "administrative politics" charge that it applies only to treaty-amending decisions and other rare circumstances. "Historical institutionalists" charge that it overlooks endogenous feedback from previous decisions. "Post-functionalists" and "constructivists" revive discredited claims from the 1960s that functional theories neglect the central role of identity claims and ideology in explaining national interests. While each criticism contains some truth, LI possesses rich theoretical resources with which to address them fruitfully and musters compelling evidence to support its empirical claims. This confirms LI's preeminent role in scholarly debates and suggests a soberly optimistic future for European and regional integration.
Eine Vielzahl intergouvernmentaler Analysen, die sich mit dem Prozeß der europäischen Integration befaßen, stellen die Vertragsverhandlungen der Mitglieder in den Mittelpunkt ihrer Untersuchungen. Neue Forschungen bedienen sich zur Klärung des Entscheidungsverhaltens eines sogenannten "power index". Diese Analyse mißt die Einflußmöglichkeit einer Regierung in Relation zu allen möglichen Koalitionen im Ministerrat, die in einer bestimmten Sachfrage von Bedeutung wären. Besonders zwei Defizite sind hierbei zu erkennen. Erstens kann sie nicht die Präferenzen von Regierungen quantifizieren und daher ihren jeweiligen Einfluß messen. Ferner läßt diese Analyse den Einfluß der weiteren Akteure, wie Kommission und Parlament gänzlich außer Acht und reduziert das Entscheidungsverhalten auf die Exekutive unter Ausschluß legislativer Faktoren. (SWP-Krh)
European integration theories help us understand the actors and mechanisms that drive European integration. Traditionally, European integration scholars used grand theories of integration to explain why integration progresses or stands still. Born out of assumptions that are prevalent in realist international relations theories, intergovernmentalism was first developed as a theory in opposition to neofunctionalism. In a nutshell, intergovernmentalism argues that states (i.e., national governments or state leaders), based on national interests, determine the outcome of integration. Intergovernmentalism was seen as a plausible explanatory perspective during the 1970s and 1980s, when the integration process seemed to have stalled. Despite the fact that it could not explain many of the gradual incremental changes or informal politics, intergovernmentalism—as did various other approaches—gained renewed popularity in the 1990s, following the launch of liberal intergovernmentalism. During that decade, the study of European integration was burgeoning, triggered in part by the aim to complete the single market and the signing of the Maastricht Treaty that launched the European Union (EU). Intergovernmentalism also often received considerable pushback from researchers who were unconvinced by its core predictions. Attempts to relaunch intergovernmentalism were made in the 2010s, in response to the observation that EU member states played a prominent role in dealing with the various crises that the EU was confronted with at that time, such as the financial crisis and the migration crisis. Although intergovernmentalism is unable —and is not suited—to explain all aspects of European integration, scholars revert to intergovernmentalism as a theoretical approach in particular when examining the role of member states in European politics. Outside the EU, in the international arena (such as the United Nations), intergovernmentalism is also observed when studying various forums in which member states come together to bargain over particular collective outcomes in an intergovernmental setting.