Intergovernmentalism: Old, Liberal, and New
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Intergovernmentalism: Old, Liberal, and New" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Intergovernmentalism: Old, Liberal, and New" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Shaping Europe, S. 51-74
In: International organization, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 269-299
ISSN: 0020-8183
Eine Vielzahl intergouvernmentaler Analysen, die sich mit dem Prozeß der europäischen Integration befaßen, stellen die Vertragsverhandlungen der Mitglieder in den Mittelpunkt ihrer Untersuchungen. Neue Forschungen bedienen sich zur Klärung des Entscheidungsverhaltens eines sogenannten "power index". Diese Analyse mißt die Einflußmöglichkeit einer Regierung in Relation zu allen möglichen Koalitionen im Ministerrat, die in einer bestimmten Sachfrage von Bedeutung wären. Besonders zwei Defizite sind hierbei zu erkennen. Erstens kann sie nicht die Präferenzen von Regierungen quantifizieren und daher ihren jeweiligen Einfluß messen. Ferner läßt diese Analyse den Einfluß der weiteren Akteure, wie Kommission und Parlament gänzlich außer Acht und reduziert das Entscheidungsverhalten auf die Exekutive unter Ausschluß legislativer Faktoren. (SWP-Krh)
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 539
ISSN: 0020-8183
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 585-595
ISSN: 1743-8772
In: The European Council and the Council, S. 33-67
In: The International Politics of EU-China Relations, S. 118-128
In: Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies, S. 19-34
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 611
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 317-331
ISSN: 0021-9886
Moravcsik, Andrew M.: The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. - Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press, 1998. - 515 S. + Enthält Rezensionen von: European integration and supranational governance. / Ed. by W. Sandholtz ... - New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998. - 389 S. + Armstrong, Kenneth A.; Bulmer, Simon J.: The governance of the single European Market. - Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press, 1998. - 340 S
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 539-539
ISSN: 1531-5088
Please substitute the following for the definition on page 276 of our article in the Spring 1996 issue of International Organization (Volume 50, No. 2, pp.269–99):Definition. A coalition of m (out of n) members is nonconnected if there is a member i ε {N} – {M} that belongs in the Pareto set of {M}.
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 55, Heft 6, S. 1192-1202
ISSN: 1468-5965
AbstractThis research note responds to recent debates about new intergovernmentalism and argues that the hypotheses of Bickerton, Hodson and Puetter overlook the roles non‐state actors play in the integration process. It intends to open up a debate about private power and the new intergovernmentalism, demonstrating that the concentration of powers of national governments has proceeded alongside the concentration of powers of transnational business interests in Europe. The note draws on the example of the civil security industry and Justice and Home Affairs policies in order to modify the six hypotheses of new intergovernmentalism.
In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Band 56, Heft 7, S. 1578-1594
SSRN
In: Journal of contemporary European research: JCER, Band 9, Heft 3
ISSN: 1815-347X
The functioning of the European Union (EU) has been explored extensively in recent years. The dominant prism through which to look at the EU is still one of locus: i.e. whether decisions are made in the capitals of its member states or in Brussels. This debate is contained in the dualism between intergovernmentalism and supranationalism, but drawing the boundaries between the two concepts is still undone. This article attempts to contribute to solving this problem by investigating the restrictive measures policy of the EU in order to identify three conditions under which intergovernmentalism should be used. First, when EU institutions are dependent on EU member states for information and expertise; second, when decision-making powers rest mainly in EU capitals; and three, when there are no exclusive fora for decision-making in Brussels. The study of the restrictive measures of the European Union does not meet any of these three conditions; therefore the article argues that the concept of supranational intergovernmentalism offers useful insights to understand the EU security governance of CFSP sanctions. The article is divided into four parts. The first introduces the debate on security governance and justifies the selection of this specific approach to the study of sanctions. The second part presents the restrictive measures policy of the European Union and justifies its pertinence to the field of security. The third part of the article investigates the emerging patterns in security governance by testing the three conditions on the decision-making process for EU restrictive measures. Finally, the conclusion summarises the main argument and indicates ways forward in the study of EU sanctions from a governance perspective.
In: The international spectator: journal of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 18-32
ISSN: 1751-9721