Joint Operations - Rethinking 'Joint'
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 97, Heft 3, S. 22-24
ISSN: 0025-3170
53599 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 97, Heft 3, S. 22-24
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 97, Heft 2, S. 76-76
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Local government studies, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 88-91
ISSN: 1743-9388
In: Development and change, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 255-279
ISSN: 1467-7660
This article examines the concept of 'jointness' in India's Joint Forest Management (JFM) programme, understood as an engagement between the state (in this case the Forest Department) and people organized into 'communities', with NGOs, where available, acting as the interface. By examining the commonalities between older examples of joint or co‐management of resources and current practices of joint forest management, the article challenges the notion that 'jointness' is a new feature of forest policy, or that it represents a resurgence of civil society against the state. Further, insofar as the basic agenda of the programme is pre‐determined, it cannot be considered very participatory in nature. None the less, within the limited degree of choice that JFM allows, there is a new and joint construction of needs.
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 83, Heft 5, S. 43-44
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: The Middle East journal, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 345
ISSN: 0026-3141
In: Joint force quarterly: JFQ ; a professional military journal, Heft 31, S. 30-54
ISSN: 1070-0692
In: International affairs: a Russian journal of world politics, diplomacy and international relations, Heft 11, S. 32-39
ISSN: 0130-9641
World Affairs Online
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 98, Heft 2, S. 80-82
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Journal of social ontology, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 97-118
ISSN: 2196-9663
Abstract
This paper introduces freely improvised joint actions, a class of joint actions characterized by (i) highly unspecific goals and (ii) the unavailability of shared plans. For example, walking together just for the sake of walking together with no specific destination or path in mind provides an ordinary example of FIJAs, along with examples in the arts, e.g., collective free improvisation in music, improv theater, or contact improvisation in dance. We argue that classic philosophical accounts of joint action such as Bratman's rule them out because the latter require a capacity for planning that is idle in the case of FIJAs. This argument is structurally similar to arguments for minimalist accounts of joint action (e.g., based on joint actions performed by children before they develop a full-fledged theory of mind), and this invites a parallel minimalist account, which we provide in terms of a specific kind of shared intentions that do not require plan states. We further argue that the resulting minimalist account is different in kind from the sort of minimalism suggested by developmental considerations and conclude in favor of a pluralistic minimalism, according to which there are several ways for an account of joint action to be minimal.
In: Soldier: the British Army magazine, Band 52, Heft 9, S. 14-16
ISSN: 0038-1004