Some Judgments on the Judgment Calls Approach
In: American behavioral scientist: ABS, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 225-232
ISSN: 1552-3381
In: American behavioral scientist: ABS, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 225-232
ISSN: 1552-3381
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 172-333
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: The spokesman: incorporating END papers and the peace register, Heft 108, S. 48-50
ISSN: 0262-7922, 1367-7748
In: APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 66, Heft 2
ISSN: 1938-274X
Hannah Arendt's conceptualization of judgment may only drive political theorists further from the phenomenon. Throughout her life, Arendt's work on judgment was guided by Kant's thought. Arendt's reading of Kant's work raises two difficulties to which contemporary political scientists should attend. First, Arendt's reading of Kant is a systematic misreading of his texts. Second, Arendt's misreading of Kant pushes her toward a misreading of the phenomenon of judgment. More important, Arendt's misreading has led political theorists to assume a divide between the points of view of the actor and of the spectator, which cannot be reconciled given the resources of Arendt's thought. Adapted from the source document.
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 254-266
ISSN: 1938-274X
Hannah Arendt's conceptualization of judgment may only drive political theorists further from the phenomenon. Throughout her life, Arendt's work on judgment was guided by Kant's thought. Arendt's reading of Kant's work raises two difficulties to which contemporary political scientists should attend. First, Arendt's reading of Kant is a systematic misreading of his texts. Second, Arendt's misreading of Kant pushes her toward a misreading of the phenomenon of judgment. More important, Arendt's misreading has led political theorists to assume a divide between the points of view of the actor and of the spectator, which cannot be reconciled given the resources of Arendt's thought.
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 521-546
ISSN: 0304-2421
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 254-266
ISSN: 1065-9129
In: Ethics & global politics, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 231-254
ISSN: 1654-6369
SSRN
Working paper
In: Ethics & Global Politics, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 2011
SSRN
The prevalence of the rules and practices on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments gradually blurs the dividing line between 'recognition' and 'enforcement'. However, recognition is not an afterthought of enforcement.00'Recognition of Foreign Judgments' explores how the courts in the selected jurisdictions, namely the European Union, England and Wales, and the United States, decide whether and to what extent to grant some preclusive effects to foreign judgments, while giving recognition to foreign judgments. These effects can possibly be relied on by foreignjudgment holders to prevent a repetition of litigation of the same disputes or issues. To further reveal the practical significance of recognition of foreign judgments, this book explores some typical maritime cases and examines how the effects of certain maritime judgments can be extra-territorially realized by recognition, and how the mechanism of recognition of foreign judgments assists in achieving the objectives of the important legal mechanisms of maritime law
The author has spent a lot of time preparing cases against the Government of Iran and its controlled entities. This Article will draw upon that experience to discuss the enforcement of judgments rendered in international litigation. The focus is on two aspects of judgment enforcement: (1) the enforcement of judgments of United States or other courts against the Government of Iran and (2) the enforcement by Iran of judgments obtained against United States companies in the courts of Iran.
BASE
In: Christianity and the Criminal Law, eds. Norman Doe, Dick Helmholz, Mark Hill, John Witte, Jr. (London: Routledge), Forthcoming
SSRN
In: U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-02
SSRN
Working paper