Suchergebnisse

The article analyzes the phenomenon of marital violence. The empirical object of the study is the population of the Republic of Mordovia. The purpose of the study is to assess the current situation and identify the main factors and causes of domestic violence against spouses.
The authors consider the types and forms of marital violence, the level and frequency of abuse, and the determinants of family violence.
As part of the sociological research, a survey of residents aged 18 and older was conducted. The sample size was 384 people, the representative features were gender, age, place of residence. The gender and age structure of the respondents corresponds to the structure of the region's population. A quantitative method was used as a tool for collecting primary information — an individual
face-to-face interview at the respondent's place of residence using a paper questionnaire (PAPI) and a CAWI survey using an interactive questionnaire in the proportion of 30 to 70 %, respectively.
It was revealed that more than half of the residents have not experienced domestic violence and categorically deny spousal violence, considering it unacceptable and unacceptable.
It is determined marital violence in most cases manifests itself in various forms of mental violence: withholding, verbal aggression, aggressive dominant behavior, manifested in a ban on communication with friends or girlfriends. Economic abuse manifests itself in the infringement of the opportunity to purchase clothes, food and have personal running expenses. Physical and sexual violence is less common between spouses and partners.
Based on the study, it was found that marital violence is caused by subjective factors (family interaction practices, financial status, and alcohol consumption) that contribute to the reproduction and spread of abuse

The article is devoted to domestic (family) violence in modern Russian society. The problem of domestic violence has long ceased to be an individual's problem. It harms not only the victim, but also the state and society as a whole. Every year in Russia, 14,000 women die at the hands of their husbands. In Russia, domestic violence was first officially reported in the early 1990s. It is necessary to take into account the fact that in the past centuries the patriarchal family dominated, in which women occupied subordinate positions. The woman had to obey her husband unquestioningly and endure the beatings. Children were brought up in the same way. Corporal punishment was mandatory in the family. There is no specific law against domestic violence in our country. Domestic violence also abhors moral and ethical values.

The authors looked at causes, varieties, statistics, cycles, the effects of domestic violence and ways to prevent domestic abuse in modern society. There are several forms of violence: physical, psychological, sexual and economic. The consequences of domestic violence are: self-harm, mental disorders, sleep disturbances, depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, alcohol or drug use, etc. Properly coordinated work by health care, law enforcement, and social services agencies can play an important role in preventing domestic violence. At the same time, both individual and general social prevention with young people should be carried out in order to prevent domestic violence and, of course, to introduce a law against domestic violence.

Констатируется, что экстремизм связан с политическими амбициями обретения властных полномочий с помощью насилия. Такие амбиции могут присутствовать и в религии, особенно если она выдвигает универсалистские претензии. Утверждается, что религиозно-мотивированный экстремизм присутствует в движениях, для которых характерно представление о невозможности толерантного отношения к иным религиозным формам и воззрениям. Религиозный экстремизм, показательным примером которого сегодня является исламизм, ориентирован на установление теократии, а не политической диктатуры. Показано, что постоянно готовый к насилию религиозный экстремизм дрейфует в сторону религиозного терроризма, который представляет собой агрессивные насильственные действия против несогласных с экстремистами людей. Насилие служит достижению религиозных, политических или идеологических целей, а терроризм является средством оказания давления. ; Extremism is associated with the political ambitions of gaining power through violence. Such ambitions can also be present in religion, especially if it imposes universalist claims. There is religiously motivated extremism in the movements for which the conception of the impossibility of tolerant attitude to other religious forms and views is typical. Religious extremism, exemplified by Islamism today, is directed toward establishing a theocracy, not a political dictatorship. Constantly ready for violence, religious extremism is drifting towards religious terrorism, which is an aggressive violent act against people who disagree with extremists. Violence serves religious, political or ideological purposes, and terrorism is a mean of putting pressure.

The reasons, preconditions and basis of the conflict of civilizations in the
modern world context of violence and nonviolence ratio, modern and traditional
character are discussed in the paper. The basic values and fundamental attitude
principles of life of modern and traditional civilizations are defined.

The article deals with the problems of criminal law counteraction to violent crimes against the order of management. Attention is focused on the high social danger of these crimes, due to the peculiarities of the object of criminal encroachment, while the danger of crimes differs taking into account various forms of violence. A subspecies of crimes against the order of management related to the use of violence against subjects of managerial activity, responsibility for which is provided for in Articles 317, 318, Part 2 of Article 320, Part 2, 3 of Article 321 of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation. The forms of violence and their features are defined. It is proposed to recognize that in the dispositions of the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation, a plurality of concepts is used to define violence in crimes against the order of governance: encroachment; violence not dangerous to life and health; violence dangerous to life and health; threat of violence; grave consequences. Taking into account the practice of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation, the content of each of the forms of violence is determined. Some controversial issues of the qualification of crimes are considered. ; В статье рассматриваются проблемы уголовно-правового противодействия насильственным преступлениям против порядка управления. Акцентировано внимание на высокой общественной опасности этих преступлений, обусловленной особенностями объекта преступного посягательства, при этом опасность преступлений различается с учетом различных форм насилия. Выделен подвид преступлений против порядка управления связанных с применением насилия в отношении субъектов управленческой деятельности, ответственность за совершение которых предусмотрена ст. 317, 318, ч. 2 ст. 320, ч. 2 и 3 ст. 321 УК РФ. Определены формы насилия и их особенности. Предлагается признать, что в диспозициях статей Особенной части УК РФ используется множественность понятий для определения насилия в преступлениях против порядка управления: посягательство; насилие, не опасное для жизни и здоровья; насилие, опасное для жизни и здоровья; угроза применения насилия; тяжкие последствия. С учетом позиций Верховного Суда РФ определено содержание каждой из форм насилия. Рассмотрены отдельные спорные вопросы квалификации преступлений.

В статье рассматриваются античные сюжеты, в которых женщина выступает источником и исполнителем физического насилия, проводится их предварительная классификация и сравнительно-типологический анализ, а также характеризуется отношение к ним самих античных авторов. Исследование позволило прийти к выводу о типологическом разнообразии подобных персонажей и высокой степени их интегрированности в античные представления об устройстве мира.
The article deals with ancient plots in which a woman acts as a source and executor of physical violence, conducts their preliminary classification and comparative-typological analysis, and also characterizes the attitude of the ancient authors themselves to them. The study made it possible to come to the conclusion about the typological diversity of such characters and a high degree of their integration into ancient ideas about the structure of the world.

Авторитаристские системы управления востребуют учредительное насилие в качестве механизма социальной консолидации. Маргинализация индивидов и групп наделяет их статусом потенциального врага, способствующего консолидации немаргинализованной части общества в соответствии с концепцией политического К. Шмитта и учением Р. Жирара о «козле отпущения». Тяготение к такой стратегии политического единения обусловлена спецификой авторитарно-архаического господства, основного на осуществлении насилия, а не производстве благ, обеспечивающих институциональную лояльность все большего числа подвластных. ; Authoritarian systems of government need the constituent violence as a mechanism of social consolidation. Marginalization of individuals and groups gives them their status of a potential enemy that contributes to the consolidation of a non-marginalized part of society in accordance with the concept of political of K. Schmitt and the teaching of R. Girard about the scapegoat. The disposition to this strategy of political unity is due to the specificity of authoritarian-archaic domination, the main one on the exercise of violence, and not the production of the benefits that ensure the institutional loyalty of the increasing number of subordinates.