"Contributing to feminist approaches to masculinities, this book examines men's contextual experiences of masculine identity. Drawing on new data which compares men as they move across and between public and domestic spaces, it explores the implications of this for the nature of contemporary masculinity"--
Changing circumstances in Western and global societies have introduced new constraints and opportunities for men and the formation of male identities. Meanwhile, the emerging diversity of 'atypical' identities ('atypical' when compared with traditional conceptions of middle-class, white, heterosexual men) poses new challenges for the production and use of spaces.Spaces of Masculinities provides a comprehensive introduction to the innovative and diverse research on spaces of masculinity. Drawing on a variety of geographical research projects, the central concern of the book is to highlight the
Despite it being not only central to the politics of critical studies on men and masculinities but also one of Connell's four patterns of masculinity developed alongside the now-canonical 'hegemonic masculinity', the concept of 'complicit masculinity' has received little attention. This article suggests that complicit masculinities should be understood as political masculinities, in that they are from the beginning shaped by the existing politics and power relations that construct gender. This means acknowledging that masculinities are always at risk of complicity. Rather than this rendering the notion of 'complicit masculinities' redundant, I draw on a range of critical studies on men and masculinities to argue that identifying complicity as a feature of masculinities: first, allows us to identify three interrelated dimensions of complicity, which I label as 'intentional', 'structural' and 'intersectional' complicity; and, second, can serve as the starting point for a men's profeminist politics.
Challenges the assumption that masculinity can be measured in terms of some dimension(s) that are discoverable, & argues that there is no single masculinity, but multiple manifestations of what it means to be male. Analyses of masculinity must be grounded in general discussions of gender within the contexts of history & culture. 1 Reference. K. Hyatt Stewart