Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
3748 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Philosophers since ancient times have pondered how we can know whether moral claims are true or false. The first half of the twentieth century witnessed widespread skepticism concerning the possibility of moral knowledge. Indeed, some argued that moral statements lacked cognitive content altogether, because they were not susceptible to empirical verification. The British philosopher A. J. Ayer contends that 'They are pure expressions of feeling and as such do not come under the category of truth and falsehood. They are unverifiable because they do not express genuine propositions.' The second half of the twentieth century brought a revival of interest among philosophers in moral and political questions. Whether or not ethics can be founded upon a rational basis continues to preoccupy the philosophical community even now
In: Routledge library editions. Ethics volume 16
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 51, Heft 6, S. 581-602
ISSN: 1502-3923
In: Routledge library editions. Ethics volume 4
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 236-256
ISSN: 1471-6437
In the area of moral epistemology, there is an interesting problem facing the person in my area, ancient philosophy, who hopes to write a historical paper which will engage with our current philosophical concerns. Not only are ancient ethical theories very different in structure and concerns from modern ones (though with the rapid growth of virtue ethics this is becoming less true), but the concerns and emphases of ancient epistemology are very different from those of modern theories of knowledge. Some may think that they are so different that they are useful to our own discussions only by way of contrast. I am more sanguine, but I am quite aware that this essay's contribution to modern debates does not fall within the established modern traditions of discussing moral epistemology.
Moral knowledge disappears -- A "science of ethics"? -- G.E. Moore: from science of ethics to nihilism -- Emotivism: the erasure of moral knowledge -- A rational form of noncognitivism? "Rational necessity relocated" -- A consensus of rational people: social constructionism in Rawls -- Practices, traditions, and narratives: social constructionism in MacIntyre -- Prospects for a return of moral knowledge
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 74, S. 46-47
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 7, S. 6739-6765
ISSN: 1573-0964