Nationalization in Practice
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 201
ISSN: 1540-6210
325 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 201
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Foreign affairs, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 44
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: The American journal of economics and sociology, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 169-169
ISSN: 1536-7150
In: Portugal. [Englische Ausgabe] : informative review, S. 9-12
ISSN: 0032-5031
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 10, Heft 58, S. 503-508
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Foreign affairs, Band 25, S. 44-58
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 44
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Australian quarterly: AQ, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 9
ISSN: 1837-1892
In: Far Eastern survey, Band 14, Heft 15, S. 201-204
In: Far Eastern survey, Band 14, S. 201-204
ISSN: 0362-8949
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 22
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: Canadian journal of economics and political science: the journal of the Canadian Political Science Association = Revue canadienne d'économique et de science politique, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 146-162
No topic has evoked so much discussion in all parts of Great Britain, and indeed in the world outside, as the Labour Party's programme to nationalize 20 per cent of the economy. Nationalization is recognized by all as the most important domestic issue facing the nation because the industries brought under public ownership are vital to Britain's economic recovery at home and a key to her future role in foreign affairs. As the Conservatives will continue the programme as conceived by Labour, except in the case of the iron and steel industry which will probably be returned to private ownership, an analysis of British nationalization is as pertinent today as it was during the Labour Party's tenure in office.The Labour Party defined its nationalization plan in a 1945 electoral document titled Let Us Face the Future which stated in part:There are basic industries ripe and over-ripe for public ownership and management in the direct service of the nation. There are many smaller businesses rendering good service which can be left to go on with their useful work.There are big industries not yet ripe for public ownership which must nevertheless be required by constructive supervision to further the nation's needs and not to prejudice national interests by restrictive anti-social monopoly or cartel agreements, caring for their own capital structures and profits at the cost of a lower standard of living for all.
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 13-14
ISSN: 1930-6571