Beyond Neo-Marxism
In: Telos, Band 36, S. 5-28
ISSN: 0040-2842, 0090-6514
Socialism's failure, particularly in its Marxist form, to provide a workable revolutionary approach has been followed by abstract socialist theory which is at odds with practical revolutionary efforts, in which incompatible visions of social alternatives are mingled. Such organizations as workers' councils do not constitute a public sphere, but absorb within themselves liberties which should be exercised by popular assemblies. This tendency is enhanced by overconcern with the factory, which cannot be a social organism. Neo-Marxism coopts current radical movements into classical Marxism's problematic premises & libertarian concepts become authoritarian ones; needed is a clearly defined boundary. Precapitalist societies differed from capitalism in being basically organic; even in medieval society neighborhoods in cities were largely self-governing. Capitalist society, based on the logic of commodity relations, has simplified social life to the inorganic level, threatening the ecological survival of the earth as a whole. Bureaucracy, whether under capitalism or state socialism, embodies this inorganic approach, treating individuals as anonymous units. A truly revolutionary movement must aim to reconstitute society without delegated authority, to abolish all forms of domination (not merely economic exploitation), & to abolish all forms of hierarchy (not merely social classes). Modern neo-Marxism so far fails to offer such an alternative & supports the situation it professes to attack. W. H. Stoddard.