Free Fall and Free Will: Social Sciences Facing New Challenges
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 237-246
ISSN: 1588-2918
495 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 237-246
ISSN: 1588-2918
One striking aspect of the coronavirus crisis was the poor response of the right-wing populist leaders to the pandemic in countries such as the US, Britain, and Brazil. Despite this fact, the continuing voter support right-wing populist leaders attract across countries with different socio-economic traits is puzzling. In this paper, we argue in favour of a cognitive anthropological view of populism scholarship. Cognitive and evolutionary anthropology shows that mental systems common to all humans shape the way we understand the world, making some ideas more plausible than others regardless of their levels of accuracy. Even though the action of 'building a wall' to keep illegal migrants away can prove ultimately unfeasible and does not address real immigration issues, due to our cognitive evolution, it makes intuitive sense as a plausible option to reducing immigration. Populist leaders exploit our cognitive intuitions by providing such intractable but oftentimes intuitively-plausible ideas in order to get elected or to promote preferred policies. Furthermore, we intuitively admire powerful individuals and tend to defer to authoritative and charismatic figures as an evolutionary strategy for acquiring valued skills and negotiating hierarchies. As a result, by committing to the intuitively-plausible policies populist leaders promote, such as 'building a wall', they give additional credence to the political beliefs that are based on our cognitive intuitions, effectively increasing their plausibility for the "common folk".
BASE
This is an exploratory study of populist political movement Sme rodina – Boris Kollár (We Are a Family – Boris Kollár, since November 2019 only Sme rodina). The paper first locates this movement into a lose concept/sui generis family of political parties (the niche party), arguing in contrast to some typologies that this is primarily protest populist party presenting some niche issues, and only secondarily, an entrepreneurial party. The paper also answers the question why this party is considered as being populist by many political and non-political actors and analysts. The paper also suggests that there is actually non-existent, but assumed direct correlation between the support for this party and the decline in the standard of living, as sometimes presented in public discourse. In contrast, it is suggested here that there may be stronger links between relative poverty, feeling of being abandoned by political elites/parties, and low educational levels. Moreover, there played an important role previous knowledge (celebrity status) of the party leader who was often presented and discussed in tabloid media. For this reason, many young females voted for this party. The party also managed to raise a widely perceived problematic issue that was seen as not tackled sufficiently or at all by the previous governments and other competing political parties (the niche or salient issue).
BASE
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 324-342
ISSN: 1588-2918
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 109-124
ISSN: 1588-2918
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 140-147
ISSN: 1588-2918
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 169-185
ISSN: 1588-2918
ISSN: 2063-0468
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 99-116
ISSN: 1588-2918
In: Társadalomkutatás, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 45-62
ISSN: 1588-2918