Suchergebnisse

One of the market anomalies that often occurs in the capital market is the January Effect. This phenomenon occurs when stock returns in January become higher or increase compared to other months. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the January Effect and test the effect of institutional ownership of the anomaly January Effect. This study also uses market returns, stock turnover, and firm's size as control variables. The sample in this study were 73 companies that are categorized as LQ-45 inIndonesia Stock Exchange(ISE) period of 2012 to 2014 in accordance with predetermined criteria. This research method is purposive sampling with analysis techniques using t-test and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) which uses (α = 5%). The results of this study proves that the January Effect andinstitutional ownership has significant negative effect on January Effect. In addition, the results showed that market return, stock turnover, and firm's size has a significant positive effect on return.

The frequent occurrence of conflicts of interest between shareholders and management, causing agency problems. One way to overcome this issue is to include managerial ownership (Jensen and Meckling, 1976). The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of ownership structure on agency costs. The structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, government ownership,and foreign ownership. The population in this research is manufacturers listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a sample of 102 companies taken by purposive sampling method. To test the hypothesis, the research uses multiple regression analysis with a significance level of 0.05. The results show that managerial ownership and institutional ownership have no significant effect on agency costs. Likewise, government ownership and foreign ownership also have no significant effect on agency costs.

The frequent occurrence of conflicts of interest between shareholders and management, causing agency problems. One way to overcome this issue is to include managerial ownership (Jensen and Meckling, 1976). The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of ownership structure on agency costs. The structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, government ownership,and foreign ownership. The population in this research is manufacturers listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a sample of 102 companies taken by purposive sampling method. To test the hypothesis, the research uses multiple regression analysis with a significance level of 0.05. The results show that managerial ownership and institutional ownership have no significant effect on agency costs. Likewise, government ownership and foreign ownership also have no significant effect on agency costs.

This study aims to determine the relationship between zombie companies and the performance of corporate social responsibility, with corporate governance and ownership as moderator variables. A zombie company is a near-insolvent firm due to inefficiency and low profitability but still survive with external support from the government or bank (Kane, 1987). The determination of the sample is done by a purposive sampling method, with OLS and Moderated Regression Analysis methods. The number of research samples is 288 companies with a total of 1865 observations for the period 2010-2017. The analysis shows that CSR performance in zombie companies is lower than that of non-zombies. The moderator variable of corporate governance is proxied by board composition, while ownership is proxied by family ownership and institutional ownership. The board composition and institutional ownership variables do not moderate the negative effects of zombie companies on CSR performance, while the family ownership variable worsens the relationship between zombie companies and CSR performance. The research control variables are financial leverage, a dummy of state-owned enterprise, and firm size. While financial leverage has no effect on the CSR performance, the state-owned enterprise and firm size are positively related to that performance.

This study aims to determine the reaction of foreign ownership on the Indonesia Stock Exchange to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This study will examine the reaction of foreign ownership on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the periods 2007-2010 and 2012-2015. The variables used in this study are IFRS and foreign ownership. It finds that the obligation of IFRS does not affect the development of foreign investment in Indonesia, because accounting standards in Indonesia have been adjusted to IFRS since 2008 and investment decisions are not only influenced by standard accounting policies, but also by other factors, such as the economic and political conditions of a country. This study is motivated by the results of previous studies regarding the reaction of foreign ownership of IFRS adoption, which is still controversial. Some studies suggest that IFRS adoption increases information appeal and can attract foreign investment, while other research states that IFRS adoption will not necessarily increase the number of shares held by foreign investors.

This study aims to determine the reaction of foreign ownership on the Indonesia Stock Exchange to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This study will examine the reaction of foreign ownership on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the periods 2007-2010 and 2012-2015. The variables used in this study are IFRS and foreign ownership. It finds that the obligation of IFRS does not affect the development of foreign investment in Indonesia, because accounting standards in Indonesia have been adjusted to IFRS since 2008 and investment decisions are not only influenced by standard accounting policies, but also by other factors, such as the economic and political conditions of a country. This study is motivated by the results of previous studies regarding the reaction of foreign ownership of IFRS adoption, which is still controversial. Some studies suggest that IFRS adoption increases information appeal and can attract foreign investment, while other research states that IFRS adoption will not necessarily increase the number of shares held by foreign investors.

Financial distress is a condition that occurs before a company goes bankrupt, so before that happens, the company needs to take actions such as good corporate governance practices. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of the audit committee, ownership structure, and CEO on financial distress in trading, service, and investment companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2018. The analysis technique used is logistic regression analysis. This type of research is quantitative by using a sample of 25 companies determined through a purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the frequency of audit committee meetings had a significant and positive impact on financial distress, and institutional ownership had a significant and negative impact on financial distress. While the other variables include: audit committee size, audit committee competence, audit committee independence, managerial ownership, family ownership, government ownership, foreign ownership, block holder ownership, and CEO's gender do not have a significant impact on financial distress. Implications of the results in this study are considering the frequency of audit committee meetings and the percentage of institutional ownership in predicting financial distress that can be used by companies and potential investors.

Jurnal Bisnis & Ekonomi, Vol. 9, No. 1, April 2011, p. 77 ; This research is testing whether managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and company's standard have any influence on the amount of Related Party Transaction (RPT) both in the case of payable and receivable account. The research uses the sample of 112 manufacture companies listed in BEI in 2008. RPT for payable account is counting by dividing the total payable account of related party with the total obligation, while the RPT for receivable account is counted by dividing the total receivable account of related party with the total asset. The variable of managerial ownership is counted from the portion of the stock the management owns, and the variable of , institutional owns, while the company's standard is proxied by the log total asset. The datas obtained is tested using doubled regression analysis. The result of the research shows that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and company's standard collectively have a significant influence on the RPT of payable account. However, partially only the company's standard has a significant negative influence on the RPT of payable account. On the other hand, the result shows that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and company's standard do not have any significant influence on the RPT of receivable account in both collectively and partially

The role of institutional ownership in the financial markets became very important. However, until today there is no consensus among researchers about the influence of institutional ownership on the characteristic of stock market. Therefore, researchers are motivated to conduct further research the influence of institutional ownership on the characteristic of stock market. The research conducted at the Indonesian Stock Exchange with traded spread and adverse selection costs as dependent variable and institutional ownership as independent variable. In addition to institutional ownership, also used standard deviation of common stock price and trading volume as a control variable to clarify the relationship of institutional ownership on the characteristic of stock market. The study was conducted on 120 firms with observations in the period 2010-2011. All the required data obtained from the Indonesian Capital Market Directory. The results showed that: First, institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on traded spread. Second, the variability of traded spread is able to be explained by the variability of institutional ownership, standard deviation of the stock price, and trading volume 24.8 percent. Third, institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on adverse selection costs. Fourth, the variability of adverse selection costs is able to be explained by the variability of institutional ownership, standard deviation of the stock price, and trading volume 26.2 percent. Fifth, the relationship between institutional ownership to traded spread and adverse selection cost before and after entering the control variables remain negative and significant.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of real estate credit on liquidity risk. This study also looked at the role of government ownership and foreign ownership in moderating the effect of real estate credit on bank liquidity risk. There are 43 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2014-2018 period used as samples. This study used a multiple linear regression model with the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) estimation method and robustness tests using the Maximum Likelihood (MLE) estimation method. The results of this study concluded that real estate credit has a significant positive effect on liquidity risk. Government ownership strengthens the positive effect of real estate credit on liquidity risk, while foreign ownership weakens the positive effect of real estate credit on liquidity risk.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship of firms with family ownership and their performance in Indonesia and further examine on how political connections affect this relationship. This study used 933 samples from 413 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period between 2014 and 2016. Using ordinary least square (OLS) regression, the results shows that firms without family ownership (non-family firms) have better performance than firms with family ownership (family firms) in Indonesia. Furthermore, the findings also show that the performance of family firms significantly improve when the firms are affiliated with political connections. Our findings imply that establishing political connections in family firms will increase the performance of the firms

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship of firms with family ownership and their performance in Indonesia and further examine on how political connections affect this relationship. This study used 933 samples from 413 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period between 2014 and 2016. Using ordinary least square (OLS) regression, the results shows that firms without family ownership (non-family firms) have better performance than firms with family ownership (family firms) in Indonesia. Furthermore, the findings also show that the performance of family firms significantly improve when the firms are affiliated with political connections. Our findings imply that establishing political connections in family firms will increase the performance of the firms.

A lot of researches have studied good corporate governance implementation in manufacturing companies; this research, however, is more focusing in banking industry. Since bank holds important key role in the economics, bank needs a good governance to get a good reputation to play its role well. This research was conducted using secondary data obtained from annual reports of banking companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the year 2008 until 2012. The data was analyzed using multiple regression method.The result showed that foreign ownership, board size, and external auditor, as corporate governance variables, partially and significantly affect bank financial performance, while large shareholders, government ownership, commissioner size, independent commissioner proportion, and capital adequacy ratio are found to insignificantly affect bank financial performance. Furthermore, firm size as controlling variable, is insignificantly affect the relationship between corporate governance variables and bank financial performance.

This research is motivated by the people of the Selayar Islands Regency who experience limited information about birth certificate documents at this time, which is due to limited human and material resources both in quantity and quality, as well as the geographical location in the form of islands. The main problem of this research is that the issuance of birth certificates is still not optimal. The purpose of this study was to describe the issuance strategy by the Department of Population and Civil Registration of the Selayar Islands Regency in accelerating the ownership of birth certificates. This study uses qualitative research methods with the object of research being the issuance of birth certificates. Data collection techniques: observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis consists of three activities carried out together, namely data selection, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study reveal that the Strategy of the Department of Population and Civil Registration has been running but still has obstacles in its implementation. This is due to various factors that occur in the field so that the implementation of the strategy has not been maximized. The researcher recommends that to reach services in the archipelago, it is better to use online. This will certainly make it easier for the community and officers to provide services in an effort to accelerate birth certificate ownership in the archipelago.

This study aims to describe the process of collaborative governance in maintance of air pollution in Surabaya City. The result shows that the collaborative governance has three stages, there are identifying obstacles and opportunities, debating strategies for influence, and planning collaborative actions that haven't been effective yet. That shows in the criteria of collaborative governance which hasn't been fulfilled yet especially in distributive accountability and access to resources criteria in the debating strategies for influence stage. Those criterias indicate the lack of involvement of other stakeholders in the collaboration forum and the insufficient financial resources.