The Dayton Peace Agreement and the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Sarajevo, 19 November 2015 : proceedings
In: Special editions Volume 166
In: Department of social sciences Volume 7
In: Department of Humanities Volume 44
In: Special editions Volume 166
In: Department of social sciences Volume 7
In: Department of Humanities Volume 44
In this paper, the author analyzes the key stages in the development of the Republic of Srpska, since its formation in 9 January 1992. In this context, it elaborates the process of genesis of the Republic of Srpska, its international verification by the Dayton Peace Agreement, post-conflict consolidation as a process of trial of the constitutional reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina that would redistribute responsibilities between the entity and state authorities. However, the paper points out that the Republic of Serbian unquestionable categories and that the current attempt by the U.S. and the EU for the amendment of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina did not imply denial of two-entity structure of the state. In the future, how would you rate the author will attempt leading actors in world politics to redesign the institutional framework at the level of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as to strengthening its negotiating capacity to assume the obligations related to membership of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
BASE
Nowadays, there are divided opinions in Bosnia and Herzegovina when it comes to further mandate of the OHR and the institution of the High Representative. However, the e nd of the mandate of the High Representative is realistically expected in the near future. The need to abolish the office of the OHR and the institution of the High Representative has been mentioned increasingly in Bosnia and Herzegovina, especially in the Republic of Srpska. The reasons for the abolition of the function of the High Representative are different between the entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as among its constitutive peoples. The authority of the High Representative has been increasingly questioned.It is on that basis that questions arise more frequently whether his (High Representative) legal acts will be valid, in particular individual decisions, such as deprivation of certain rights to citizens, the right to work, political action and passive right to vote. Representatives of the international community are worried that the interested domestic political circles could set a thesis (and be successful at it) that all acts of the High Representative will cease to apply at the moment when Annex X of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina is ended.A number of imposed laws not yet adopted by the local legislator himself, in the event of cancellation, would actually return BiH to the original competences under the Constitution BiH, as the legal consequence. The institution of the High Representative was set up by Annex X (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of the Peaceful Solution) of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Simultaneously, bearing in mind these facts, legally speaking, Bosnia and Herzegovina can not be classified into any known form of international dependence, however, the objective situation is such that Bosnia and Herzegovina with the powers vested in the High Representative and the actions that he is taking, can be considered a state with a specific form of international dependence and a special form of guardianship.
BASE
United States participation in international politics during the period between the two world wars, come not only from the general and often declarative interest in peace, but was also a consequence of extremely rapid expansion of their foreign trade and overseas capital investments. It was a period of intense financial diplomacy, when efforts to maintain the gold standard, to determine the amount of reparations and the manner of payment of war debts, brought confusion not only in relations between victors and vanquished, but also in relations between the United States and its former European allies. Abandonment of the gold standard and the creation of the tripartite agreement between the United States, Britain and France, in the 1936, was a milestone in the development of international monetary cooperation and the role of United States in international economic relations. .
BASE
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 85-96
ISSN: 1332-4756
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 73-89
ISSN: 1332-4756
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 176-178
World Affairs Online
In: Časopis za suvremenu povijest: Journal of contemporary history, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 7-37
ISSN: 0590-9597
World Affairs Online
In: Časopis za suvremenu povijest: Journal of contemporary history, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 7-39
ISSN: 0590-9597
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 56, Heft 2-3, S. 305-321
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 48, Heft 1-2, S. 9-150
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 20-42
ISSN: 1332-4756
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 2, Heft 1-2, S. 152-174
ISSN: 1332-4756
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 7-19
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Izdanja Ranjeni labud / Biblioteka Suvremena pitanja, Knj. 126,8
World Affairs Online