Public Policies of Social Economy and Dialogue with Civil Society in Spain
At the international level, Spain is considered a success story in collaboration between public authorities and the social economy. The nature of these existing relationships and of future association between public authorities and civil society organizations, reflects several factors: the nature of political culture (neo-corporatism), path dependency, social and economic importance as well as the type of social economy, ways of structuring representation, notoriety, the perception of the utility of these types of enterprises by public and private actors (unions, research and training organisations, etc.), the organisation of public space (and the quality of public debate), the party system (its internal organisation and its legitimacy crisis) and the prioritisation they grant to the social economy in their political agenda, and, finally, the importance of the four levels of government- European supra-state, national, regional and municipal. There are other factors to be added, but it is understood that the aforementioned aspects are necessary and sufficient to have an accurate picture of the collaboration of public authorities and the social economy in Spain. Our hypothesis affirms that the impact of the social economy on the design of policies and in their implementation has reached a very high level in our country, especially in some of its regions, such as Andalousia and part of the Basque region, due to a synchronization of favorable elements in each of the categories below. We understand that the methodological tool with more significant explanatory power to understand the origin and of the implementation of these policies, is that of community and political networks. We also believe that in the analysis of a case such as that of public/private collaboration in this specific domain, the description of policies in place as well as an analysis of the actors and of their discourse, have great explanatory power for drawing conclusions which can serve to better understand not only the origins of a particular policy, but also its nature. In the Spanish case, we find ourselves in a political sub-system, that of political policies supporting the social economy, which present a vast range and diversity of measures including cases with a high degree of sophistication and of innovation. According to the classification of the politics of SUPPLY and DEMAND by Chaves (2002), in the first case, we present all of the types of public policies available. For example, in the case of institutional policies, we see that there exists a large number of important sites in the different divisions of public administrations (usually at the administrative level); the representative organizations of the social economy have developed with a significant level of technical abilities and relational capital and the judicial framework is rich and varied. The decentralized political and administrative structure of the Spanish State, favors, in a certain way, benchmarking and territorial innovation. Among other types of measures, it is important to underline those of a cognitive nature. Therefore, outside the more traditional measures of training, there exists very ambitious and innovative experiences of training targeting political representatives of organizations, prescribers, etc. There are also measures to raise awareness, to promote study and to reinforce the structure of the social economy, considered fundamental among most of the respondents who participated in our research. In conclusion, it is important to note that we have extracted, a series of elements from discussions and surveys, which could explain the process and, in part, the reasons for the success of this good practice. We note, in particular: the importance of the process; the adaptation of the culture of the sub-system; the process of co-construction of the social economy's identity; its structuring; the organization of public space (the decentralised State) and the historical inertia (path dependency). We must equally emphasize the importance of the cognitive element in the policies, the role of the Outline Law of the Social Economy, in the sense that it enshrines philosophical concepts in legal forms and the importance of participation of representatives of the social economy in formal and informal forums.