Suchergebnisse

pt. 1. Principles of government. Monarchial government.--pt. 2. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. 3. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Includes index (v. 2). ; At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. ; Mode of access: Internet.

The purpose of this study is to identify the similarities and differences between the political philosophy ofPlato and political philosophy of Aristotle. Such comparative study is very important for politicalthought in general. The main significance of this paper is the precise meaning of the political philosophyof Plato and political philosophy of Aristotle, as well as the meaning of differences and similarities.Often, Plato's political ideas appear as Aristotle political ideas, and Aristotle's political ideas appear asPlato's political ideas. The main method of study in this paper is the comparison method. The ancientpolitical debate between Plato and Aristotle is important to modern political philosophy as it is the basisof modern political theories. The data for paper are taken from the books of these two authors. Thepolitical philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, although they have similarities in some points, but differ inmany other issues, such as: different categories of political analysis, different methodologies of policystudy, and different reasons for state creation, different opinions why democracy is a bad form ofgovernment and why aristocracy is the right form.

At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the diffusion of useful knowledge. ; pt. 1. Principles of government. Monarchical government.--pt. 2. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. 3. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the diffusion of useful knowledge. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the diffusion of useful knowledge. ; pt. 1. Principles of government. Monarchical government.--pt. 2. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. 3. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Pt. 3 is called 2d ed. ; At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the diffusion of useful knowledge. ; pt. 1. Principles of government. Monarchical government.--pt. 2. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. 3. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. ; pt. I. Principles of government. Monarchiacal government.--pt. II. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. III. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Recon6.

Includes indexes. ; At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Under the superintendence of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. ; pt. I. Principles of government. Monarchical government.--pt. II. Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments.--pt. III. Of democracy. Mixed monarchy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

[Vol.3] called pt.2 on title page. ; v.1. Principles of government. Monarchical government. Eastern monarchies. - v.2. European monarchies. - [v.3] Of aristocracy. Aristocratic governments. ; Mode of access: Internet.

The emergence of the first literature concerning the methodology of political philosophy, which we have witnessed over the last decade, indicates a general methodological shift within the discipline. This shift can be interpreted as a sign of the ongoing adjustment of political philosophy to the domain of science that had already begun when analytical political philosophy incorporated from logical positivism the premise of the unity of method of science and philosophy. The urge to have an epistemic source of justification for normative political theories lead analytical political philosophy to the development of various methodological frameworks from among which reflective equilibrium became the most influential one and nowadays it is being considered as the most widely used method in the contemporary political philosophy overall. Reflective equilibrium aims to provide knowledge that falls into the same category as scientific knowledge; however, it can also lead to various normative distortions resulting in the elimination of metaphysics, meta-ethics and religious claims from the normative part of political philosophical theorising. These normative distortions not only can result in epistemically wrong conclusions; above all, they implicitly affirm the normative propositions of political conceptions of liberalism. Hence, the prevalence and uncritical use of reflective equilibrium might narrow the topical scope and undermine the reflective and critical role of the discipline of political philosophy itself.

Discussion of Spengler's political philosophy translated into Georgian in 20th century by - Mose Gogiberidze (1897-1949)

The language of hope is a ubiquitous part of political life, but its value is increasingly contested. While there is an emerging debate about hope in political philosophy, an assessment of the prevalent scepticism about its role in political practice is still outstanding. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of historical and recent treatments of hope in political philosophy and to indicate lines of further research. We argue that even though political philosophy can draw on recent analyses of hope in analytic philosophy, there are distinct challenges for an account of hope in political contexts. Examples such as racial injustice or climate change show the need for a systematic normative account that is sensitive to the unavoidability of hope in politics as much as its characteristic dangers.

Openly licensed anthology focused on the theme of Modern Political Philosophy. Contains Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes; The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli; The Communist Manifesto by Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx; The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte by Karl Marx ; On the Jewish Question by Karl Marx Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 by Karl Marx; The German Ideology by Karl Marx; Capital by Karl Marx ; Second Treatise of Government by John Locke; The Social Contract & Discourses by Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche