Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
This provocative new textbook takes up and develops the themes of rationality and irrationality in Jon Elster's earlier work. Its purposes are threefold. First, Elster shows how belief and preference formation in the realm of politics are shaped by social and political institutions. Second, he argues for an important distinction in the social sciences between mechanisms and theories. Third, he illustrates those general principles of political psychology through readings of three outstanding political psychologists: the French classical historian, Paul Veyne; the Soviet dissident writer, Alexander Zinoviev; the great French political theorist, Alexis de Tocqueville
In: International social science journal: ISSJ, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 221-236
ISSN: 0020-8701
An overview of the field of political psychology, defined as the scientific study of the interaction of political & psychological processes: a bidirectional interaction. Some of the difficulties in achieving & sustaining a scientific approach in this area are described. The content of political psychology is described in terms of eight substantive areas of research in the field: (1) the individual as political actor; (2) political movements; (3) the politician or political leader; (4) political alignments & structures; (5) political intergroup relations; (6) political processes; (7) case studies; & (8) human development & the political economy. Summaries of several illustrative studies in political psychology are provided. 2 Figures, 65 References. AA.
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 859-882
ISSN: 1541-0986
We contribute to a greater understanding of political psychology by 1) collecting data in a more systematic way for the intellectual community, 2) sensitizing students to the extent to which any intellectual discipline is socially constructed and is a work in progress, 3) heightening awareness of the political aspects of intellectual life, 4) exposing readers to the wide variety of diverse approaches and methodologies utilized by political psychologists, and 5) suggesting the range of topics that political psychology can address successfully and the range of techniques it can utilize.
In: The world of political science
In: The World of Political Science – The development of the discipline Book Series
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 513-516
ISSN: 1467-9221
In: Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology
In this 2002 volume, political psychologists take a hard look at political psychology. They pose and then address, the kinds of tough questions that those outside the field would be inclined to ask and those inside should be able to answer satisfactorily. Not everyone will agree with the answers the authors provide and in some cases, the best an author can do is offer well-grounded speculations. Nonetheless, the chapters raise questions that will lead to an improved political psychology and will generate further discussion and research in the field. The individual chapters are organised around four themes. Part I tries to define political psychology and provides an overview of the field. Part II raises questions about theory and empirical methods in political psychology. Part III contains arguments ranging from the position that the field is too heavily psychological to the view that it is not psychological enough. Part IV considers how political psychologists might best connect individual-level mental processes to aggregate outcomes
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 779-782
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 68, S. 42-45
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 11-25
ISSN: 1467-9221
One hundred years ago, if we proposed that we could make you happy with a pill, we would have been ridiculed and would have entered the realm of science fiction and not science itself. Yet that is precisely where we are today. The genetics and neurobiological revolution is upon us, and we advocate that political psychology not simply join this revolution but take a lead role in it. Here in this review, we explore the various ways in which political psychology can embrace this revolution and incorporate work in neuropsychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry, endocrinology, and recent advances in genetics. In doing so, we advocate the adoption of an epidemiological approach and discuss the ways in which various methods including physiological experimentation, genetic analysis, and neurological explorations including MRIs and other technical advances provide critical insight into human behavior and present intriguing possibilities for exploring the nature of political attitudes, attachments, and behaviors. In advocating for broadening the approaches used in the field, we reflect critically on how we might improve and strengthen the accuracy of our understanding of the psychological bases of political preferences and behavior in the future.