Men in Political Theory
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1476-9336
132136 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 92-115
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 92-115
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 398-413
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Philosophy & public affairs, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 115
ISSN: 0048-3915
In: British journal of political science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 379
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 396-408
ISSN: 0090-5917
SSRN
Working paper
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 480-487
ISSN: 1741-2730
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 480-487
ISSN: 1474-8851
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 465-486
ISSN: 1541-0986
Penn State's decision to eliminate political theory set off existential angst about the status of political theory in the discipline. The organized, defensive responses to that decision failed to answer the central question it posed: Is "political theory" social science, and if not, why does it belong? I argue that social scientific political theory is political science and its many strains—conceptual, normative, and explanatory—belong in the discipline on their own terms. Humanistic research, like dermatology or music theory, is not political science and as such it should find another home. By explaining why (and what kinds of) political theory is political science this article may wind up being offensive in both senses of the word. But it is meant to be in service to a more secure, stable, and productive interdisciplinary future for all kinds of political theory going forward.
Theorists interested in learning more about any given interpretive approach are often required to navigate a dizzying array of sources, with no clear sense of where to begin. The prose of many primary sources is often steeped in dense and technical argot that novices find intimidating or even impenetrable. Interpretation in Political Theory provide students of political theory a single introductory reference guide to major approaches to interpretation available in the field today. --
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 63, Heft 3, S. 674-679
ISSN: 1938-274X
Political theorists cannot reasonably maintain an institutional attachment to the discipline of political science and claim a place in the curriculum of the field while professing intellectual autonomy. Political theory is the progeny of American political science, as well as a subfield of the discipline, and it is important to dispel mythologies of political theory as a separate world-historical endeavor. Political theorists, like all social scientists, must realistically come to grips with their cognitive and practical relationship to their subject matter and resist the forms of dislocated rhetoric that sustain their often anomalous condition.
In a world no longer centered on the West, what should political theory become? Although Western intellectual traditions continue to dominate academic journals and course syllabi in political theory, up-and-coming contributions of 'comparative political theory' are rapidly transforming the field. Deparochializing Political Theory creates a space for conversation amongst leading scholars who differ widely in their approaches to political theory. These scholars converge on the belief that we bear a collective responsibility to engage and support the transformation of political theory. In these exchanges, 'deparochializing' political theory emerges as an intellectual, educational and political practice that cuts across methodological approaches. Because it is also an intergenerational project, this book presses us to re-imagine our teaching and curriculum design. Bearing the marks of its beginnings in East Asia, Deparochializing Political Theory seeks to de-center Western thought and explore the evolving tasks of political theory in an age of global modernity.