The paper deals with the transformation of power at the local level, by making reference to Lecce, a middle city in the South of Italy (Salento), as a case study. The authors draw their empirical material from a wider sociological research on the same topic they have edited in 2014 (Cremonesini, Cristante, Longo 2014) and try to sketch how the crisis of traditional political parties has produced a renewed vitality of relational networks, yet by now unable to define a common strategy and to share common values and a common strategic project for city policies.Keywords: power, elites, salons, relational networks, local government, South Italy
Preliminary Materials /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther -- Chapter One. Introduction /H.-C. Günther -- Chapter Two. Josef Liegle (1893-1945) /A. Kerkhecker -- Chapter Three. Heidegger And Politics /F. Fédier -- Chapter Four. Sartre Und Die Macht /W. Biemel -- Chapter Five. "Lektüre" Als Machtrelevante Wahrnehmungsanalyse Bei Simone Weil /R. Kühn -- Chapter Six. Philosophers In Japan In The Period Of World War II—Reflecting The Philosophy Of Nishida Against The Background Of Social Phenomena /Hisaki Hashi -- Chapter Seven. Mao Und Die Intellektuellen /Harro Von Senger -- Chapter Eight. Hans Pfitzner – Ein Genie Und Sein Verhältnis Zur Gesellschaft /J. P. Vogel -- Chapter Nine. Abstract Musical Works As Objects Of Political Interest? The Example Of Schönberg's Op. 11,1 /H. Eiholzer -- Chapter Ten. La Poesia Politica Degli Augustei /P. Fedeli -- Chapter Eleven. Political Analysis In Horace'S Roman Odes /T. Reinhardt -- Chapter Twelve. Stalin, Putin And The Poets /D. Rayfield -- Chapter Thirteen. Nationale Dichtung Im 20. Jh.: Der Griechische Dichter Und Politiker Giorgos Seferis /H.-C. Günther -- Notes On Contributors /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther -- Index /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther.
La recente riedizione di Trust and Power - l'opera di Luhmann che propone, in lingua inglese, due lavori del sociologo tedesco sulla fiducia e sul potere nella società complessa – testimonia il vivo interesse, nella conoscenza sociologica, per temi come quelli della comunicazione, della complessità sociale e delle sue semplificazioni sistemiche. Luhmann definisce la fiducia come un investimento a rischio, funzionale a connettere la limitata conoscenza e la parziale ignoranza delle riduzioni di complessità ambientale effettuate dai contesti comunicativi di cui è formata la società complessa, estrapolando elementi informativi dall'evidenza disponibile. Il nesso che lega la fiducia al rischio consente di distinguere la prima dalle situazioni di interazione sociale elementare nelle quali entra in gioco la familiarità. Al progredire delle forme di differenziazione funzionale, la fiducia acquisisce la tipica connotazione riflessiva dei sistemi funzionalmente differenziati per svilupparsi nella fiducia nei sistemi esperti. Il potere costituisce un medium di comunicazione simbolicamente generalizzato, strumento ausiliario al linguaggio e motivazionale nel facilitare l'accettazione di riduzioni della complessità ambientale effettuate da altri. La stabilizzazione del potere attraverso le forme giuridiche è una delle condizioni di possibilità della specificazione del codice binario in termini universalistici e dell'instaurarsi dei meccanismi riflessivi, per mezzo dei quali viene aumentata la tecnicizzazione del potere, ottenendone ripercussioni nella configurazione del sistema politico. Mediante il potere si delinea, allora, la relazione tra diritto e politica nella società complessa. È da rilevare come in Luhmann non venga sollevata alcuna domanda né sulla legittimità dei contesti comunicativi qui esaminati né su una loro eventuale predominanza, argomenti che renderebbero i sistemi sociali condizionati ed esposti ad influenze ambientali, sottoponendoli a livelli di complessità esterna di ardua gestione. ; The recent re-edition of Trust and Power - the work of Luhmann that offers, in English, two works by the German sociologist on trust and power in the complex society - testifies the lively interest, in sociological knowledge, for topics such as communication, of social complexity and its systemic simplifications. Luhmann defines trust as an investment at risk, functional to connect the limited knowledge and partial ignorance of the reduction of environmental complexity carried out by the communicative contexts of which, according to systemic theory, the complex society is formed, extrapolating information elements from the available evidence. The link that binds trust to risk makes it possible to distinguish the former from situations of elementary social interaction in which, mainly, familiarity comes into play. As functional forms of differentiation progress, trust acquires the typical reflexive connotation of functionally differentiated systems to develop in trust in expert systems. Power constitutes a symbolically generalized medium of communication, an instrument that is auxiliary to language and motivational in facilitating the acceptance of reductions in environmental complexity carried out by others. The stabilization of power through juridical forms is one of the conditions of possibility of the specification of the binary code in universalistic terms and of the establishment of the reflexive mechanisms of functionally differentiated social systems, through which the technicalization of power is increased, obtaining reflections in the configuration of the political system. By means of power, then, that relationship between law and politics, in complex society, is outlined. It should be noted that in Luhmann no question is raised on the legitimacy of the communicative contexts examined here or on their possible dominance, topics that would make the social systems conditioned and exposed to environmental influences, subjecting them to levels of external complexity of difficult management.
Si discutono strategie e politiche di esecuzione di applicazioni multithread su architetture multicore eterogenee con l'obiettivo di ottimizzare prestazioni e consumi. La parte sperimentale è condotta su architettura ARM big.LITTLE.
This text offers food for thought about the psychosocial dimensions of power and their implications in the genesis and maintenance of a social order such as the current one, characterized by a profound crisis of civilization, in order to help identify adequate strategies to achieve a better understanding of the intertwining of unconscious and social dynamics that determine its current configuration and identify possible lines of development that allow it to lead to forms of configuration more consistent with the possibility of a cultural and spiritual development, peaceful and harmonious, of all kinds human. This reflection develops starting from the comparison between the two declinations of power over and power of, in relation to the relational dynamics of power (of the elite) with the other from oneself, according to the configurations of the latter as enemy or known friend, or - in a more productive way and according to a logic of reciprocity - according to that of the unknown friend, to be known, precisely - in a non-definable way - through a productively common doing, on the basis of the model of social coexistence proposed by Renzo Carli.