Suchergebnisse

The paper examines the evolution of the Mexican presidential system from a diachronic point of view. In the first part, the paper explores the historical evolution of the Mexican presidential system (paragraphs no. 1, 2, 3 and 4). In the second part of the paper, it is analyzed the traditional form of government of the Mexican legal system (paragraphs no. 5, 6, 7 and 8). Finally, in the third and last part, the paper retraces the current and innovative evolutions of the Mexican system (paragraphs no. 9 and 10).

In this paper the author examines the theme of research of the stability of government in the Italian Constituent Assembly with reference at Switzerland government model between parliamentarism and presidentialism system. The stability of Italian government is very problem in the news constitutionals rules: in the different parties there are fluctuation between parliamentarism and presidentialism but in the cultural background of Italians deputies there are also proposals of directorial Swiss model. Nevertheless the different political and social italian habitat with strong radicalisation is opposite at research of the stability of government: result is parliamentarism without rationalisation with frequents crisis. Adapted from the source document.

The essay offers a general overview of the Law on the Amendment of the Russian Constitution, which was signed by the President on 14 March 2020 and will be submitted to popular ratification on the 1st of July. The article aims to highlight the shortcomings both in terms of the procedure followed, which was unusual, and of the Law's contents, which reinforce Presidential competences and role. This is particularly significant as, as a general rule, the power distribution does not change when specific elements − already present in the legislation and in the institutional practice − are introduced at a constitutional level

This article analyzes (in terms of "normal science") the two typologies of democratic forms of government elaborated by Arend Lijphart in the last two decades. According to Lijphart, the different forms of government are fundamental variables to define different types of democratic regime. Lijphart marks the difference between presidentialism & parliamentarism without including semipresidentialism in his typologies. On the contrary, as pointed out by Giovanni Sartori, the semipresidential form of government keeps a specific position, both in theoretical & empirical terms. Starting from Sartori's point of view, in the second part of the article, the author elaborates a new typology of democratic forms of government. Based on Lijphart's methodological criteria, the new typology includes, together with presidential & parliamentary, also semipresidential forms of government. 5 Tables, 152 References. Adapted from the source document.