Suchergebnisse
Filter
Advanced public design, 1, Public infrastructure: street furniture, transportation, community space
In: Advanced public design 1
�젙遺� 吏��썝 �솚�옄�븞�쟾 �뿰援ъ쓽 ���떦�꽦 寃��넗 ; Feasibility Study of Government-Sponsored Patient Safety Research
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to figure out the current state of patient safety research in Korea and to evaluate whether the research fund support project for patient safety research is proceeding in priority order. Methods: Through the literature search, a list of research projects in the field of patient safety in Korea were collected as of January 6, 2017. Four researchers independently evaluated the subject using the priority list of patient safety research derived from the previous study. Results: As of January 2017, a total of 21 research projects were conducted in the Korea Health Industry Development Institute and 42 research studies were conducted in the National Science & Technology Information. The results of the priority evaluation showed that there were no researches that ranked first and second priority. Many of the research topics were �쁀dverse drug events/drug errors,�� �쁇ealth information technology/information systems,�� and �쁋ess relevance.�� Conclusion: Patient safety research projects are not only diverse but also quantitative in Korea. Support for research topics that need to be prioritized is needed, such as developing safety indicators and measuring patient safelty levels, improving communication, and improving patient safety incident reporting systems. ; open
BASE
사회 문제 를 보는 새로운 눈: 한국 사회 의 33가지 쟁점 = 33 issues in Korea
World Affairs Online
Advanced public design, 3, Urban planning: regeneration, urbanism, housing & urban
In: Advanced public design 3
蹂닿굔�냼 援ш컯蹂닿굔�떎 �떎�깭 諛� �뾽臾댁뿉 �쁺�뼢�쓣 誘몄튂�뒗 �슂�씤 ; The evaluation of the community based public oral health program in public health centers
The community-based public oral health program in public health centers was launched in 1993 to promote oral health of the community. This program is considered to be more important after local autonomous government and the passage of national health promotion law. The aims of this study were to evaluate this program and propose adequate guidelines for future public oral health program in public health center. For this study, the mail questionnaire survey was carried out from the 18 public health center. The sample is consist of the 23 dentists and 57 hygienests who work in oral health center of public health center now. Facilities, equipments, manpower and finance of public oral health center, task recognition of dentists and hygienests were investigated. Multiple regression analysis were performed to identify the factors which influence on the outcome of the program. Dependent variable is outcome of program and the independent variables are population size, financing, equipments, motivation of dentist., an extent of work. And also chi-square test were performed to compare the task recognition between dentists and hygienests. The major findings are summarized as follows. 1. Average space of oral health centers are 26.4 �렊 and only 33.3% of the centers have space in the facilities for tooth brushing and mouth rinsing and 45% have no dental unit chair. Oral examination instruments and education equipments are very poor. 2. Program population size (p<0.01), motivation of dentists (p<0.01), finance (p<0.05), an extent of work(P<0.05) and equipment (p<0.05) variables showed statistical significance at the multiple regression analysis, so these variables have an influence on the outcome of the program. 3. The dentists recognized that the priorities of mojor task have to be given to oral examination (57.9%), organizing the health promotion event (57.9% and planning and evaluation of program (57.9%), but hygienests recognized this task are performed in cooperation with the dentists. Recognition of planning and evaluation of program (p<0.01), budget planning (p<0.05), organizing of oral health promotion event (p<0.01) and propagation of program (p<0.05) variables showed statistically significant difference between dentists and hygienests. From the above results, adequate facility, space, basic instruments and education equipments, motivation of dentist, an extent of work and financial supporting are the essential factors to implement the successful public oral health center program. And also required are the job analysis of hyginests and dentists for the reallocation of tasks. ; open
BASE
Local autonomy and local personnel system: Presentations at the 8th joint international seminar, Sept. 20-22, 1995, Pusan, Korea
In: Seminar Series, 95-01
Cho C. H.: The evolution of Korean local self-government. - S.223-250. Becker-Blonigen, W.: Local administration and local sovereignty in staff matters in the Federal Republic of Germany. - S.251-266. Sewell, J. M.: Personnel issues in British local government. - S.267-285. Muto, H.: Local autonomy and local personnel system in Japan. - S.303-321. Cha, M. J.: An overview of American public personnel policy and management. - S.322-350. Hoffmann-Martinot, V.: Local autonomy and local personnel system in France. - S.351-401. Cho I. H.: Local autonomy and local personnel system in Korea. - S.424-438
World Affairs Online