Who ConsultsSangomasin Khayelitsha? An Exploratory Quantitative Analysis
In: Social dynamics: SD ; a journal of the Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 161-182
ISSN: 1940-7874
34625 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social dynamics: SD ; a journal of the Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 161-182
ISSN: 1940-7874
In: Journal of leisure research: JLR, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 165-178
ISSN: 2159-6417
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 188-201
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Addison-Wesley series in behavioral science
In: Canadian studies in economics 19
In: The Effects of Political Institutions on Varieties of Capitalism, S. 79-102
In: Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2015-14
SSRN
Working paper
In: Teaching Political Science, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 123-128
In: Canadian public policy: Analyse de politiques, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 89
ISSN: 1911-9917
In: Sociology: the journal of the British Sociological Association, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 497-498
ISSN: 1469-8684
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 55, Heft 6, S. 544-549
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 554
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 6, S. 411-428
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 411
ISSN: 1537-5331
Campaign financing and party identification are generally considered to be the most important explanatory variables in determining judicial election outcomes, judicial primary elections make it possible to test the importance of other explanatory variables by controlling for party identification. The existence of both the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals also makes it possible to test the role of campaign financing. This article compares primary elections for these two courts of last resort by using logit analysis in an effort to explain election outcomes from 1988 until 2004. The hypothesis that differences in jurisdiction would also create systematic differences in the selection politics for these two courts was supported by the results of this study.
BASE