Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
In: Ossietzky: Zweiwochenschrift für Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft, Band 15, Heft 15/16, S. 595-596
ISSN: 1434-7474
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 307-313
ISSN: 0031-2290
World Affairs Online
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 307-313
ISSN: 1460-2482
In: The political quarterly, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 446-449
ISSN: 1467-923X
In: EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe, S. 138-162
In: Routledge research in political communication
This is the first study to investigate the dynamics and effects of a referendum campaign on politicians, media, and citizens, this innovative volume will be of interest to students and researchers of political communication.
In: Maria Cahill, Seán Ó Conaill, Colm O'Cinneide, Conor O'Mahony (eds) Constitutional Change and Popular Sovereignty: Populism, Politics and the Law in Ireland, Routledge, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 122
ISSN: 1045-7097
The article deals with the current wave of secession referendums. It argues that it seems to be part of the movement against the internationalization of domestic politics, epitomized by the process of fiscal and political integration in the EU. Analyzing the situation of Ukraine, Scotland, Catalonia and the Italian Region of Veneto, the article reaches the following conclusions: independence referendums have some distinctive features that set them apart from other forms of referendum; they are a great challenge to kelsenian sovereignty and representative democracy, but nonetheless they have to come to terms with it in order to be held; some countries seem better prepared than others to accommodate their challenge, and this must have something to do with their respective legal systems and possibly electoral systems as well.
BASE
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 57, Heft 5, S. 1170
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Politics and governance, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 227-241
ISSN: 2183-2463
We examine the gap between perceptions of seeing referendums as an important democratic principle, versus perceiving how referendums are used in practice. We term this the "referendum disappointment" gap. We find support for referendums as a democratic principle is strongest among those most disaffected from the political system, and that the disaffected are more likely to perceive they are not given a say via referendums. We also find context-specific effects. Disappointment was greater in countries with higher corruption and income inequality. We also find higher disappointment among right-populist voters, those who distrusted politicians, and among people who viewed themselves at the bottom of society. Overall, these patterns reflect disappointment with democracy among sections of society who have a sense of not being heard that conflicts with how they expect democracy should work in principle.
As the referendum becomes a more regular component of decision making, it leaves few, if any, institutions, processes and values of democracy untouched. Political actors of all kinds - including political parties and interest groups - seek to use the referendum device to further their own objectives. The end result is a different kind of democracy than existed before. This book lays out the comparative research agenda on the impact of referendums on the practice of liberal democracy.