Suchergebnisse

先秦時期,隨著列國戰事的劇烈,各國君主對國內山林藪澤資源需求亦愈加增強。為加強對這些自然資源的掌控,便導致了本文的研究對象--「地方都官」的出現。所謂「都官」,即中央機構的總稱,同時包括了真正處於中央的機構,及它們設於地方的分支單位。這些位於地方的都官,與它們的中央主幹機構一樣,屬於非治民官,與郡、縣等直接面對人民的治民官有所不同。 ; 本文首先嘗試對秦漢「地方都官」實際包括的各種機構作出考釋,並嘗試歸納地方都官的命名方式,以及對地方的縣級都官在漢代官僚系統中的地位進行探討。其次,本文又嘗試以鹽、鐵、田、工四種地方都官為例子,復原地方都官的行政架構,結果顯示,雖然這四種地方都官各自經歷了行政組織上的變革,但整體來說,四種地方都官組織的基本結構大致相同,擁有一套共用的五層組織結構。而在地方都官的裁判權方面,地方都官雖然擁有治獄、訊獄、覆獄的權力,但這種權力無疑只在處理屬吏瀆職罪行的行政程序時方可體現。事實上,地方都官在制度上雖屬中央官,但本身在行政上的各方面皆從屬於所在的郡、縣;這種二重的特質,在田官的個案身上便得到徹底的展現。 ; 最後,這些掌控帝國山林藪澤資源、為皇家服務的地方都官,因維持其生產的成本極其巨大,故在西漢末時便漸漸被廢置。至東漢時,那些還未廢置的地方都官,亦正式劃歸地方,成為隸屬於郡的機構,不復以往中央官的性格。 ; During the Warring States period, there was an increasing demand over natural resources. To have better control over these strategic resources, the central government departments established certain regional branch-offices. Unlike commanderies 郡 and counties 縣, these branch-offices, which similar to their central counterparts, were not responsible for civil affairs and were regarded as Dū-guān 都官. For the sake of convenience, these branch-offices are entitled in a somewhat contradictory way through the article --"regional Dū-guān 地方都官. ; Chapter 3 details the macro-organization of regional Dū-guān established during Qin and Han, summarizing a total of 23 different types of regional Dū-guān. It further places the regional Dū-guān under the bureaucratic system as a whole, examining their responsibilities and roles in Han bureaucracy. ; Chapter 4 narrows the scope of investigation by selecting four regional Dū-guān, namely, Offices of Salt and Iron 鹽、鐵官, Offices of Farming 田官, and Offices of Workmen 工官, using them as examples to reconstruct the administrative framework of regional Dū-guān. Astonishingly, although these regional Dū-guān had their own specialties, they did maintain a parallel administrative framework, reflecting their nature of not committing to civilian administrations. ; Chapter 5 follows a study on the jurisdiction of regional Dū-guān, elaborates that given a complete right in investigation, adjudication, and lawsuits reviews, ...

Chen, Yanyan. ; "Septembet 2011." ; Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011. ; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 135-148). ; Abstracts in English and Chinese. ; Chapter Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 ; Chapter 1.1 --- Background --- p.1 ; Chapter 1.2 --- Research Problem and Objective --- p.2 ; Chapter 1.3 --- Research Significance --- p.3 ; Chapter 1.4 --- Methodology --- p.5 ; Chapter 1.5 --- Organization of Thesis --- p.14 ; Chapter Chapter 2 --- State Rescaling and Regional Planning: Concepts and Issues in the Western Countries and China --- p.16 ; Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.16 ; Chapter 2.2 --- The Reworking of State Power --- p.16 ; Chapter 2.3 --- The Rescaling Concept --- p.19 ; Chapter 2.4 --- "The State Rescaling Concept, Regional Development and Rescaling Process in Regions" --- p.24 ; Chapter 2.5 --- The Regional Scale of Politics: Expressions of State Rescaling --- p.29 ; Chapter 2.6 --- The State Restructuring and the Rise of Regions in China: A Review --- p.32 ; Chapter 2.7 --- Summary --- p.36 ; Chapter Chapter 3 --- Conceptualizing Spatial Planning as a Process of State rescaling: towards an Analytical Framework --- p.38 ; Chapter 3.1 --- Conceptualizing the Spatial Planning as a Process of State Rescaling --- p.38 ; Chapter 3.2 --- Regional Planning in China --- p.44 ; Chapter 3.3 --- Towards a Theoretical Framework --- p.53 ; Chapter 3.4 --- Summary --- p.58 ; Chapter Chapter 4 --- The State in Transition: A Need for Planning Coordination in Cross-boundary Railways --- p.61 ; Chapter 4.1 --- Changing Political Economy --- p.61 ; Chapter 4.2 --- Institutional Structure in Planning Regional Railways --- p.71 ; Chapter 4.3 --- Pearl River Delta: the Railway Planning Context --- p.82 ; Chapter 4.4 --- General Propositions on Planning Coordination of Regional Railways in China --- p.86 ; Chapter Chapter 5 --- Planning the Pearl River Delta Intercity Railway: Institutional Form and the Planning Mechanisms --- p.90 ; Chapter 5.1 --- Introduction --- p.90 ...

India's Indo-Pacific diplomacy is born out of its 'Look East' policy, initially aimed at extending its influence into the Asia-Pacific region. Modi's June 2018 address at the Shangri La Dialogue marked New Delhi's full embracing of the Indo-Pacific concept. Thereafter, Indo-Pacific diplomacy, or such a vision, has become a new pillar of Indian foreign policy, and a new angle through which it is observed. India's Indo- Pacific diplomacy will continue to put emphasis on its relationship with ASEAN and respect for ASEAN's centrality in regional security cooperation. Meanwhile, India is expected to strengthen multilevel exchanges and cooperation in different areas with like-minded countries such as the US, Japan, and Australia, and continue to engage in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) – but probably keep a relatively low profile. Though it may share common interests with the US in dealing with a rising China, India so far seems to prefer hedging its bets on both China and the US, and is reluctant tochoose a side too early. Consequently, India's Indo-Pacific diplomacy will maintain a relatively clear-cut strategic independence. Limitations of India's Indo-Pacific diplomacy include: the kind of competition and confusion that seems to exist between its two ambitions, i.e. the Indian Ocean region as India's paramount strategic focus, and the Asia-Pacific as the hub of its Indo-Pacific diplomacy; ASEAN's centrality may be diminished by the Indo-Pacific; and India's simultaneous engagement with Quad and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization may leave the awkward impression of straddling two boats. ; 印度的印太外交脱胎于其东向政策,初心是为融入亚太。以莫迪2018 年6 月香格里拉论坛讲话为标志,印度已全面接受"印太"概念,印太外交或印太构想将成为印度对外政策的新视角和新支柱。印度的印太外交将继续重视东盟外交,尊重东盟在地区安全合作中的中心地位。同时,印度将与美、日、澳这些"志同道合"的国家在多个层面、多个领域强化互动与合作,会继续参与四国集团但会适度保持低调。尽管在应对中国崛起上印度与美国有共同利益,但印度目前仍希望在中美间采取对冲战略,不想过早选边站队,因此其印太外交将保持较强的战略自主性。印度印太外交的局限在于:印度的主要战略方向印度洋与其印太外交的主要方向——亚太之间似乎存在某种矛盾;印太本身冲击东盟的地区中心地位;以及印度同时参与四国集团和上合组织也让人感觉印度"脚踩两只船"。