Renegotiation in Transatlantic Trade Disputes
In: Transatlantic Economic DisputesThe EU, the US, and the WTO, S. 487-506
In: Transatlantic Economic DisputesThe EU, the US, and the WTO, S. 487-506
In: Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law, S. 227-265
In: Britain and European Unity, 1945–1992, S. 107-135
In: Justice and Fairness in the City, S. 125-148
In: Superpower Struggles, S. 159-179
In: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science; Game Theory and Business Applications, S. 213-246
In: Beyond Political Correctness, S. 235-265
In: Pushing the Boundaries: New Frontiersin Conflict Resolution and Collaboration; Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, S. 1-19
In: Rational Foundations of Democratic Politics, S. 198-221
In: European Missions in Contact Zones, S. 251-266
In: Barbarism Revisited, S. 165-182
In: European regionalism and the left, S. 62-81
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"The United Kingdom and the European Union" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: WTO Reform: Reshaping Global Trade Governance for 21st Century Challenges, S. 21-31
As the old adage goes: never let a good crisis go to waste. Many policy-makers across the world - representing individual countries and international organisations - deserve credit for having launched a serious debate about reforming the WTO, in light of the many serious challenges the system faces today. This reform debate has been a long time coming. But in its current state, the conversation remains largely inward-looking, and thus fundamentally inadequate. The problems confronting trade multilateralism have deep roots; technocratic fixes within the WTO, while important, can play only a small part in resolving them. A fundamental rethinking and renegotiation on the narratives that underpin globalisation is necessary if we are to address the crisis trade multilateralism faces today. This article offers some concrete recommendations to facilitate this.
Researcher ethnographic power & authority are examined through discussion of fieldwork experiences in two San Francisco, CA, law firms. The classic conception of ethnographic authority suggests that ethnographers have textual & social authority over their Ss. Such a conceptualization does not allow for the situational & relational factors that impact ethnographic authority. In one case, the female researcher's status in a male-dominated law firm represented a challenge to authority & required renegotiation of interactions with male elites. In another case, the researcher's covert status as a fieldworker prompted ethnical concerns & created tension between deceiving & exploiting people in the organization under study & achieving the goals of the ethnographic inquiry. Formation of researcher identity was vital to the ethnographic process & to unearthing the relationship between gender & power manifested in the organizations under study. 26 References. D. Generoli