Secularisms
In: Contemporary South Asia, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 337-338
ISSN: 1469-364X
1962 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Contemporary South Asia, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 337-338
ISSN: 1469-364X
In: The Salisbury review: a quarterly magazine of conservative thought, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 42-43
ISSN: 0265-4881
In: FZG - Freiburger Zeitschrift für GeschlechterStudien, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 93-110
Angesichts der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklungen wird inzwischen auch aus feministischer Perspektive ein wachsender Bedarf artikuliert, das Verhältnis zwischen Religion, Staat und Politik neu zu überdenken. Dabei wird eine Reihe von Kritiken am Säkularismus formuliert, unter anderem, dass er nie in 'reiner Form' existiert habe, ein konstitutiver Zusammenhang zwischen Säkularismus, Kolonialismus und Rassismus bestehe und er zur Zementierung der traditionellen bürgerlichen Geschlechterordnung beigetragen habe. Diese Kritiken am Säkularismus sind zweifellos berechtigt. Problematisch erscheint mir jedoch, wenn daraus die Konsequenz einer Verabschiedung des Säkularismus gezogen und von einer postsäkularen Zeit gesprochen wird. Demgegenüber votiere ich vor dem Hintergrund der zu beobachtenden Revitalisierung von Religionen für ein Festhalten am Säkularismus. Allerdings ist dafür eine hegemonie(selbst)kritische Reformulierung des Säkularismus im Rahmen eines pluralen Universalismus nötig.
In: The Indian journal of political science, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 607-614
ISSN: 0019-5510
In: Contemporary South Asia, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 348-349
ISSN: 1469-364X
In: Contemporary South Asia, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 348-349
ISSN: 0958-4935
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 295-296
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Comparative studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 46-52
ISSN: 1548-226X
The Islamic revolution in Iran at the closing decades of the twentieth century was a shocking, unexpected phenomenon in the context of modern history. Its religious emblem, the presence of the Shiite clerics as it's mobilizing motor for mass demonstrations and, eventually, the bizarre composition of Islam and revolution—an amalgam of two conceptually alien elements, with unprecedented ideological claims— created a new peculiar model of state and statecraft. The substitution of a fundamentalist regime for a semisecular monarchy replaced the crown with the turban as the paramount symbol of the Iranian national sovereignty, under the fundamentalist formulation of the "governance of the canonist" (velayat-e faqih). This new state manifesting itself through specific signs, symbols, slogans, discourses, and behaviors, as well as by appropriation of modern means of ideological propaganda, the use of revolutionary violence, and organized terror, embodied in the very structure of a state, addressed itself to the world as a new militant ideological and political power aiming, once again, to change the world. How could this extremely unexpected event happen? Explanations are various and they focus either on the dictatorial manners and erroneous actions of the shah, alongside the role played by the Western powers, specifically the United States, or on the presence and the political role of Shiism and its clergy in Iranian history. However, a few fundamental questions remain unanswered. How could a radically traditionalist religious establishment, which was normally marked by modern revolutionaries as reactionary, merge with the most radical revolutionary groups and views? What are the universal results of such a "chemical" composition for both the otherworldly religionism and secular revolutionism? How do they essentially differ in action and discourse from what they had been previously? What were the innermost historical forces that made possible this seemingly impossible phenomenon?
In: New perspectives quarterly: NPQ, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 67-70
ISSN: 1540-5842
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 61, Heft 1, S. 253-256
ISSN: 0022-197X
In: Australian quarterly: AQ, Band 82, Heft 1, S. 12-17
ISSN: 0005-0091, 1443-3605
Explores the notion that there is a perceived imbalance in governmental support for religious vs secularist worldviews in Australia. Discussion opens with an explanation of political secularism that focuses on policy options rather than the concept itself; a political secularist preoccupation with church-state separation is noted. In looking at separation in the realms of education & charities, various political secularist ideological assumptions are identified. Attention is given to the Special Religious Education debate; structural pluralism as the theoretical policy framework in play in Victoria; & a typology for the democratic governance of religious diversity. It is asserted that Australian political secularists are now seeing the value in lobbying for rather than simply articulating their agenda. D. Edelman
In: Politics, religion & ideology, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 630-631
ISSN: 2156-7697
In: Bodhi: an interdisciplinary journal, Band 7, S. 187-200
ISSN: 2091-0479
The article explores the various meanings and concepts of secularism presented by famous ideologues and sociologists of their time. Two contrary concepts of the secularism - one that defines secularism as denial of existence of religions or supernatural forces and another that defines secularism as concept of peaceful co-existence and mutual harmony has been discussed here. The difference of application of secularism on the individual human being and a state is also explained here. The article concludes that no state of human being can remain isolated or indifferent from the influence of religion even if they want. None of the concepts of secularism apply in real life performances; neither on individual nor state.
In: New perspectives quarterly: NPQ, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 22-24
ISSN: 1540-5842
In this age of confrontation, the secular Turkish model has been seen as a bridge between Islam and the West as well as the link between Europe and Asia. Now that model faces the most severe test in its history. How the current crisis is settled will frame future relations between Islam and the West no less than the events of 9/11.
SSRN
Working paper