Suchergebnisse

The Danish slaughterhouse industry is known for its Tayloristic organization of work, poor industrial relations with frequent wild cat strikes, and a hazardous work environment. However, a few slaughterhouses show big differences in sickness absenteeism, labour turnover and frequency of strikes. These slaughterhouses were studied in order to understand the latitude for cooperation and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. The results revealed that three out of four slaughterhouses studied have moved from a culture based on conflicts and opposing interests to a culture based on mutual trust and respect, thus developing social capital. Developing trust between production managers and shop stewards was the key to the new situation. This happened without jeopardizing the traditional roles of management representatives and shop stewards. The study indicates that there are possibilities of improvement of working conditions under a Taylorized regime based on collaboration between local management and workers. An important factor explaining the results is the strong position of the workers and their unions in the slaughterhouse sector and the general acceptance of unions in the Danish society.

Humanity as never before shares a common destiny, whether it be in terms of the resources of the planet, the global environment, economic integration, or the movement of peoples, ideas, cultures. For better or worse humankind is a Community of Shared Destiny 命运共同体. The People's Republic of China under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and its 'Chairman of Everything', Xi Jinping, has declared that it shares in the destiny of the countries of the Asia and Pacific region, as well as of nations that are part of an intertwined national self-interest. The Party, according to Marxist-Leninist-Maoist theory, is the vanguard of progressive social forces; it cleaves to the concept of shared destiny and its historical role in shaping that destiny. Since its early days nearly a century ago it has emphasised the collective over the individual, the end rather than the means. It addresses majority opinion while guiding and moulding the agenda both for today, and for the future.

Introduction: Shared reading has shown the ability to enrich language development in children (Dowdall et al., 2020) and academic skills into adulthood (Mol & Bus, 2011). However, due to the complexities of deafblindness and its effect on communication, some individuals may not be able to participate in traditional shared reading. Although there is very limited research on literacy for learners who are deafblind (Bruce et al., 2016), with appropriate materials and supports within the immediate environment, shared reading has the potential to be a vehicle to support literacy and communication development for learners who are deafblind. Methods: A mixed methods online survey ( n = 60) and follow-up interviews ( n = 10) helped to explore how parents, teachers, and interveners curated materials and structured the learning environment for shared reading. Descriptive statistics and inductive analysis were applied to analyze quantitative and qualitative information. Results: Information on how materials (e.g., type, selection, and adaptations) and the learning environment (e.g., location of the activity, learner positioning, and instructional supports) were utilized to support learners who are deafblind during shared reading is presented. Considerations for materials selection and development included access needs (vision, hearing, tactile), communication abilities, interests, and previous experiences. The learning environment was often intentionally selected or designed with considerations for lighting, noise, and distractions. Discussion: Materials were individualized and personalized, with supplementary items added to support communication and comprehension of the text. Learning environments were literacy-rich and accessible to the learner. Future intervention research is needed on shared reading for learners who are deafblind. Conclusion: Because of the nature of deafblindness, careful planning and implementation are needed when designing materials and learning environments for engaging learners in literacy. Future intervention research is needed to demonstrate the effective implementation of individualized and personalized literacy materials and identify environmental considerations for learners who are deafblind.

AbstractWith 2.6 billion people without access to improved sanitation facilities and with a growing urban population globally, shared sanitation in the form of public or community latrines is a pragmatic way of increasing coverage, but it is currently not deemed 'improved'. This paper explores the variety of facilities that currently exist in order to identify what would enable some of these latrines to be classed as acceptable and to ensure that future shared sanitation facilities meet minimum standards. The categories mostly relate to issues of ownership, management, location and finance rather than technological considerations. An extensive literature review reveals that the users' perspective of acceptability is largely absent from current discussions.

Intercultural, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research interfaces confront researchers with considerable challenges. Towards Shared Research portrays how scholars from different disciplinary and geographical origins and at various academic career stages strive for a more inclusive and better understanding of knowledge about African environments.The book is addressed to researchers, facilitators, and policy-makers to make a case for participatory and integrative approaches resulting in systemic and co-created analyses.