Suchergebnisse

In an era of expanding interest in international environmental problems,1 it is essential to examine the rapidly developing state practice concerning man's startling capability, through the use of technology without any hostile intent, adversely to alter not just the immediate environment of his neighbor but common resources shared by all. The present discussion does not attempt to deal with the practice of all states, but rather considers the extent to which legally relevant expectations of restraint, are being shaped by United States practice concerning the use of novel technology in the res communis? The focus on United States practice reflects the belief that, within the confines of a law journal article, considerable light may be shed on world community expectations by an examination of the practice of a state which has a major interest in the field and which
is a significant participant in the international law-creating process.

AbstractWhile heritability studies show that most of the variance in adult personality can be attributed to genetic or so-called nonshared environmental influence, this does not mean that shared events lack importance for the development of later personality differences. We studied the relationship between Big Five personality differences in monozygotic (MZ) twins at age 29, and life stressors at age 6 to 15, using prospective data from 26 MZ pairs studied from birth onwards. A positive significant correlation was found between stressors in childhood and early adolescence, and intrapair personality differences in Agreeableness, Openness, Conscientiousness, and five-factor profiles. We note that the effects of shared events are labeled "nonshared" environment when the effect is to make siblings more different. Case examples illustrate the relationship between stress and personality differences, and provide hypotheses for further studies in larger samples.

The division of Germany into two militarized blocs during the Cold War fundamentally shaped the lives of people living in both East and West. Yet, as recent scholarship has increasingly highlighted, there were also numerous areas of contact and interaction, whether in the cultural, political or social sphere. One largely overlooked aspect of these Cold War relations, which this article explores, is the environment. Focusing on the history of the shared German environment from the end of the Second World War through to the early 1970s, the article argues that on a local level, environmental problems helped to ensure the survival of cross-border relations. Despite their repeated efforts, the two states failed to divide the German landscape in half. Rivers, lakes and forests continually crossed the fortified border, while animals and plant life traversed from one side to the other too. In attempting to maintain this shared border landscape, East and West Germans were repeatedly forced into dialogue. Although relations gradually faded as the border regime was strengthened, it proved impossible for either side to escape fully the entangled German environment.

AbstractMetabolites are small molecules involved in cellular metabolism where they act as reaction substrates or products. The term 'metabolomics' refers to the comprehensive study of these molecules. The concentrations of metabolites in biological tissues are under genetic control, but this is limited by environmental factors such as diet. In adult mono- and dizygotic twin pairs, we estimated the contribution of genetic and shared environmental influences on metabolite levels by structural equation modeling and tested whether the familial resemblance for metabolite levels is mainly explained by genetic or by environmental factors that are shared by family members. Metabolites were measured across three platforms: two based on proton nuclear magnetic resonance techniques and one employing mass spectrometry. These three platforms comprised 237 single metabolic traits of several chemical classes. For the three platforms, metabolites were assessed in 1407, 1037 and 1116 twin pairs, respectively. We carried out power calculations to establish what percentage of shared environmental variance could be detected given these sample sizes. Our study did not find evidence for a systematic contribution of shared environment, defined as the influence of growing up together in the same household, on metabolites assessed in adulthood. Significant heritability was observed for nearly all 237 metabolites; significant contribution of the shared environment was limited to 6 metabolites. The top quartile of the heritability distribution was populated by 5 of the 11 investigated chemical classes. In this quartile, metabolites of the class lipoprotein were significantly overrepresented, whereas metabolites of classes glycerophospholipids and glycerolipids were significantly underrepresented.

Il lavoro si propone di affrontare un problema urgente e non rimandabile: la condizione di emergenza ambientale del pianeta terra. Il fenomeno viene ricostruito storicamente, focalizzando l'attenzione sugli aspetti filosoficamente rilevanti – come, per esempio, il rapporto tra scienza e tecnica – e dimostrando la necessità di un cambiamento di rotta, soprattutto in riferimento al fenomeno del surriscaldamento climatico. A questo riguardo viene passata in rassegna una tassonomia delle etiche ambientali, dividendole tra antropocentriche e anti-antropocentriche e considerando la rilevante eccezione a questo schema rappresentata da Hans Jonas. Vengono sottolineati i problemi che incontra l'etica nell'affrontare un compito complesso, globale, a responsabilità diffusa e per il quale è difficile individuare basi motivazionali come quello della difesa dell'ambiente. Per compensare queste mancanze viene preso in analisi il concetto di beni comuni, sulla scia della sua diffusione avvenuta negli ultimi anni. Questo è analizzato nel suo sviluppo a livello di storia delle idee. Sono presi in considerazione in modo critico i contributi di Garret Hardin, di Elinor Ostrom e dei diversi rappresentati dei fronti italiani, divisi in tre approcci: quello dei benecomunisti, quello giuridico e quello dell'etica della cura. Inoltre tale concetto viene posto in relazione dialogica con quelli di bene comune, democrazia e diritti e viene proposta una tassonomia dei suoi usi che si divide in quattro modalità: economica, giuridica, etica e sociale. Infine, viene valutato in modo critico l'effettivo contributo dei diversi fronti dei beni comuni e di un loro possibile approccio integrato possono fornire a livello etico e normativo per contribuire ala difesa dell'ambiente. L'attenzione viene posta anche sul rapporto tra crisi e opportunità e sull'etica animale. In conclusione, l'approccio dei beni comuni sembra essere insufficiente perché manca di una prospettiva globale per affrontare un problema che invece la richiede come quello ambientale. Vengono, quindi, proposte alcune possibili integrazioni. ; This work wants to face an urgent and not postponable issue: the environmental emergency on Planet Earth. The topic is explored from an historical point of view, focusing on some philosophically considerable issues – as, for example, the connection between science and technology – and showing how a change of human behaviour is needed, especially regarding global warming. A taxonomy of the environmental ethics is described, dividing them in anthropocentric and anti-anthropocentric and considering the exception of Hans Jonas. Ethic has problems to face such a complex, global, and with widespread responsibility task which does not offer a sound ground for motivation as environmental protection. In order to exceed these limits, the attention is focused on the notion of common goods, which has encountered a large use over the last few years. This topic is firstly described under the perspective of the history of ideas. Then some proposals are critically examined as the one of Garret Hardin, Elinor Ostrom and some among the different line-ups of the Italian debate as the "benecomunisti", the juridical and the ethic of care approach. Moreover the notion of commons is related in a dialogic way to other concepts such as common good, democracy and rights and a taxonomy of its uses is proposed diving them into: economical, juridical, ethical and social uses. Finally the different proposals of the commons and the one of their integrated approach are critically analysed regarding the help they can offer from an ethical and normative point of view to the task of environmental protection. Also the crisis/opportunity dialectic and topics from animal ethics are described. In conclusion, the common goods approach is considered not sufficient to face a global issue as environmental emergency because of its lack of a global perspective. Therefore some possible integrations are offered.

Twite, Robin: "Our shared environment". - S. 1-6. Issac, Jad: Environmental protection and sustainable development in Palestine. - S. 7-21. Fletcher, Elaine: Israel's environment: government, media and the public. - S. 22-57. Qleibo, Ali: Design for life. - S. 58-62. Mustafa, Ihsan: The general public and the environment: the role of environmental education and the media in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. - S. 63-76. Sagi, Yoav: Peace and open landscape. - S. 77-88. Abu-Asab, Mones S.: Sustaining the wonders: natural habits in the age of tranquility. - S. 89-96. Kuttab, Jonathan: Legal aspects of environmental control in Palestine. - S. 97-106. Laster, Richard: Environmental law in Israel today. - S. 107-146. Inbar, Yossi; Nissim, Ilan; Shapira, Dekel Amir: The state of solid waste in Israel. - S. 147-168. Hmaidi, Mohammad Said al-: The solid waste problem in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. - S. 169-181. Richter, Elihu: Sustainable agriculture and pesticides. - S. 182-196. Abu-el-Haj, Sameer: The pesticide dilemma. - S. 197-213. Fletcher, Elaine: Israelis transportation and the environment. - S. 214-245. Tal, Alon: Enmity in the wind: regulation of transboundary air pollution in an Israeli-Palestinian Environmental Agreement. S. 246-278. Assaf, Karen: Palestinian water resources - water quality. - S. 279-313. Eisenberg, Aharon: Drinking water quality in Israel. - S. 314-339. Brachya, Valerie: Environmental management through land use planning in Israel. - S. 339-354. Safi, Jamal M.: The state of the environment in Gaza Strip. - S. 355-373

AbstractBehavioral and molecular genetic research has established that child cognitive ability and academic performance are substantially heritable, but genetic variation does not account for all of the stratification of cognitive and academic outcomes across families. Which specific contexts and experiences contribute to these shared environmental influences on cognitive ability and academic achievement? Using an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of N = 1728 twins ages 7–20 from the Texas Twin Project, we identified specific measured family, school, and neighborhood socioecological contexts that statistically accounted for latent shared environmental variance in cognitive abilities and academic skills. Composite measures of parent socioeconomic status (SES), school demographic composition, and neighborhood SES accounted for moderate proportions of variation in IQ and achievement. Total variance explained by the multilevel contexts ranged from 15% to 22%. The influence of family SES on IQ and achievement overlapped substantially with the influence of school and neighborhood predictors. Together with race, the measured socioecological contexts explained 100% of shared environmental influences on IQ and approximately 79% of shared environmental influences on both verbal comprehension and reading ability. In contrast, nontrivial proportions of shared environmental variation in math performance were left unexplained. We highlight the potential utility of constructing "polyenvironmental risk scores" in an effort to better predict developmental outcomes and to quantify children's and adolescents' interrelated networks of experiences. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at: https://youtu.be/77E_DctFsr0

Perceived‐control 'describes individuals'generalized beliefs about their abilities to influence their life courses and circumstances. Most research concerning this construct has viewed perceived control as a developmentally acquired, stable personality characteristic. Others argue that perceived control is determined by current social status, with more privileged social positions contributing to increased control over life circumstances.This study analyzes data from the Virginia Twin Registry to determine the independent contributions of genetics, shared environment, and nonshared environment, including adult roles and statuses, on women's perceived control. Findings from latent variable twin models suggest that there are modest but significant effects of shared environment and genetics on perceived control but that the majority of individual variation in perceived control is due to nonshared environmental factors on perceived control among adult women. Analyses of measured individual‐level variables indicate significant effects from education, income, earnings, marital quality, age, and single‐parent status.

Wiedergabe der Statements der Konferenzteilnehmer in den einzelnen Sektionen (Rolle von Umweltfaktoren bei der Förderung von Kooperation im Nahen Osten; Entwicklung und Umwelt; Transport-, Gesundheitswesen und Lebensqualität; Energie und Wasser; Wasserqualität in der Westbank und im Central District von Israel; Rolle des Rechts im Umweltschutz; Ressourcenprotektion für Gaza und Westbank; das Tote Meer; Naturschutz; ländliches Leben im 21. Jahrhundert; regionale Zusammenarbeit bei Pestiziden; Mechanismen für bessere Zusammenarbeit). (DÜI-Sdt)

Schwartz, Eilon: Are we as trees in the field? Jewish perspectives on environment ethics. - S. 4-11. Assaf, Said: Overview of some traditional agricultural practices used by Palestinians in the protection of the environment. - S. 11-18. Kumar, Satish: Spiritual ecology. - S. 19-25. Avnimelech, Yoram: Some considerations about sustainable water and land use. - S. 26-33. Isaac, Jan: Sustainable development and the Palestinians. - S.33-48. Khoshman, Mahmoud: The concept and prospect of sustainability in the Middle East. - S. 49-54. Assaf, Karen: Water - a national resource for Palestinians - and the significance of its quality. - S. 56-62. Abd-el-Jabbar, Faid: Preserving water quality; a case study Zarka River basin. - S. 62-70. Muszkat, Lea: Groundwater quality, problems and solutions. - S. 70-86. Tal, Alon: Environmental law in Israel and its enforcement. - S. 87-100. Kuttab, Jonathan: Palestinian environmental planning and legislation. - S. 100-120. Ajjour, Mohamed: Introduction to the Gaza environmental profile. - S. 121-126. Koopmans, Reitse: Environmental problems in the Gaza Strip. - S. 126-132. Gischler, Maarten: Water resources of the Gaza Strip. - S. 132-145. Marinov, Uri: Environmental management in a developing country. - S. 146-153. Qaq, Anis al-: The PNA and environmental management. - S. 154-168. Zohar, Aharon: To live with the environment in peace. - S. 168-189. Peri, Don: The protection of open spaces: guidelines for nature conservation in Israel. - S. 190-210. Gerlin, Dan: Pest controll-associated pollution, problems and possible solutions. - S. 211-228. Hmaidi, Mohammad Said al-: Solid waste management in the West Bank and Gaza. - S. 229-234. Inbar, Yossi: Solid waste management in Israel. - S. 234-254. Taylor, Chris: Environmental education: a project approach. - S. 255-263. Mustafa, Ihsan: Environmental education in the Palestinian Territories. - S. 263-267. Delson, Beth: Environmental learning in an environmental context. - S. 267-271. Shalit, Avner de: Where do environmentalists hide? - S. 271-279. Walker, Dwight: USAID and the environment. - S. 280-286. Hoadley, Bill: UNRWA and the environment. - S. 287-295. Safi, Jamal: The Gaza Strip and regional environmental cooperation programs. - S. 296-299. Burhenne, Wolfgang: The challenge of environmental protection. - S. 299-302. Goldsmith, John R.: Concluding remarks. - S. 303-310